Domestic hard core off road vehicle, non load bearing, which transmission engine has fewer problems?

Purely from the perspective of transmission and engine engine, it is still the black King Kong of Changfeng Cheetah. After all, it is a Mitsubishi bloodline, an old brand, and its performance is also good in all aspects.

Depending on your use, if you are only driving in the city, it is better to use a model with a load-bearing body, such a model has the comfort of a sedan, the interior is beautiful, and the displacement is usually relatively low, so the fuel consumption is not high.

If you are an off-road enthusiast, then you must want a model with a non-load-bearing body. Because the body and chassis girders are separate, it is easier to adapt to rough roads. The engine horsepower of this model is larger, but the high-speed performance is not good, and the fuel consumption on the highway is high.

In addition, let me tell you: Hummer H1, Toyota Land Cruiser, Mitsubishi Pajero, Jeep Wrangler, Mercedes G55, etc. are all thoroughbred off-road vehicles, all of which use non-load-bearing chassis with girders (if you have a chance, you can lie under the real car to see if there are girders). Among thoroughbred off-road vehicles, only the Grand Cherokee has a load-bearing body, but it is a special case due to its unique suspension design, which can fully compensate for the shortcomings of the load-bearing body for poor road adaptability.

Load-bearing body and non-load-bearing body SUVs and off-road vehicles.

The non-load-bearing body suspension is mounted on the chassis and not on the body like the load-bearing type. Moreover, the rigidity of the non-load-bearing frame is much higher than the stiffness of the load-bearing body, as shown in the following figure

The load-bearing body is a rectangular frame structure, and according to junior high school physics, the spatial stability of the rectangle is the worst, and it is most likely to cause deformation and frame suspension failure. Moreover, the difficulty and cost of maintenance after deformation are very high, which is a taboo for off-road vehicles. Therefore, the non-load-bearing body with durable leather and low maintenance cost has naturally become the first choice for hard-core off-road vehicles.

Finally, there is another unknown reason, which is the versatility of the chassis. The non-load-bearing frame only needs to replace the upper structure of the different body bodies, and can easily get different deformation products, without wasting time and effort to do the repeated design of the chassis, especially suitable for the needs of the army, which requires rapid research and development of rapid equipment, and can be disassembled for maintenance and replacement from other vehicles based on the same chassis platform at any time on the battlefield, without considering whether the parts are from the armored personnel carrier or the bridge vehicle, so as to ensure the combat capability of the army to the greatest extent.