Lao Yang talked about the public examination, is it better to talk about the argument or the test?

Personally, I think that Shen Lun is good, Mr. Yang is good at teaching liberal arts, and he is quite good at verbal comprehension, analogical reasoning and definition judgment.

He has a unique view of the argument, which is definitely good compared to other institutions, at least it is all about work, and it can be used directly in the exam. The language and logic of the test are also good, at least it won't make you confused and rely on the sense of language to answer the questions! Personally, I feel good.

Lao Yang is best at argumentation, there is a lot of knowledge that can not only be used in exams, but also helpful in dealing with work in reality, which is very practical and practical. Of course, the line test is also very good, the knowledge points are explained very clearly, there are unique problem-solving skills, and now there are more and more free classes, Toutiao, Station B can be found.

Lao Yang talked about the public examination and the test very well, he will teach you how to easily control various body types and will tell you the pits you need to avoid when answering questions; Xingthe test has created a lot of answering skills to help you how to do the questions faster and more correctly in a limited time.

When I saw this question, my first reaction was that it was all good, haha. I just like Lao Yang's attitude of being scared, and the course is really level. Lao Yang also often opens free live broadcasts, rubbing every day. I also bought a course on the line test, and I've listened to it twice, and then I continue to study.

I feel that it doesn't matter whether the lecture is good or not, the main problem is that the knowledge points can be put in place, and the real questions and knowledge points (with their own unique solution methods) can be corresponded. This is something that is difficult for teachers at the institution to do. Compared with the line test, I personally prefer Lao Yang's essay class and interview class, which is very innovative!

I'm an old fan of this. How many years have the headlines been. Now it's all going to Bilibili.

It can be seen that I am also older haha. Personally, I think Shen is good, I have been learning from him, and my score has not been bad, but the test has been unstable. I didn't listen to much of the test, and the analogy was a free class, and I listened to it all.

Because it's also simple, analogies are the best to learn. Later, I plan to see his line test. It's been three years since I took the exam, and I'm looking forward to going ashore next year.

I have also studied the courses of other institutions before, saying that it is like listening to the book of heaven, the same as learning and not learning, and then I tried to learn Lao Yang's class, and I felt that the mouth was suddenly opened, and the second problem technique of the line test felt too easy to use.

I learned about Lao Yang through the introduction of my classmates, I listened to two line test courses and entered the pit, there are free open classes to learn every day, the course is straight, the more you listen, the more addicted you are, after listening to Lao Yang's words 2000 words, now the correct rate is basically maintained at 90%.Keep working hard to click.

Check out the emotes.

Personally, I like to apply for arguments, especially practical, and I am the guide on the road to the public examination, thanks to Mr. Yang.

The argument is better than the test, and the argument can hit every year.

You can prepare for both at the same time, and review it intersecting to avoid boring.

It is recommended to read the essay in the morning, because the morning is the most sober, and the essay exam needs to master some political language, and you can learn a lot by repeatedly reading the example texts. It is also necessary to grasp the news, so it is recommended that it is better to read the news network or newspapers.

In the afternoon, the line test actually does not change much, the main thing is to grasp the law. Consume a certain amount of knowledge every day, but don't overdo it, as it can lead to forgetfulness. Don't interrupt reading the book for a few days, and repeat it after reading each round to make it easy to master.

The main test is a large number of exercises, and after reading 1-2 times, you can do a large number of past questions from the Internet.

While reading books, you should read more newspapers and magazines, care about national affairs, analyze more national affairs, and apply for the essay exam to be official in your language. Maintaining a good attitude to prepare for the exam is also the basis for the success of the essay, and the process of preparing for the essay exam is relatively boring, so candidates should pay attention to regulating their emotions and prepare for the exam carefully.

Finally, it is recommended that you still enroll in a class that is suitable for your own review stage, and the one-year passing class of Zhonggong Education is good, which can allow you to avoid detours in the preparation process.

It mainly examines the analysis, generalization, refinement and processing of the given materials, and tests the candidates' reading comprehension ability, comprehensive analysis ability, ability to raise and solve problems, implementation ability, writing ability, etc.

Definition of Deuteronomy:

Argumentation refers to the analysis of the prescribed materials, the opinions of the candidates, and the argumentation in the recruitment examination for state organs and civil servants. The essay test is a competency test that simulates the daily work of civil servants.

Civil Service Examination Contents:

The written test of the public examination is divided into a line test and an argument, and the test and the argument each contain five types of questions, each of which is different in difficulty and has a different score, so when preparing for the exam, you should not flood the test and treat each question type equally, but should distinguish the priority and make a good choice.

1. Line test:

1) Common sense judgment: involving history, astronomy, geography and other aspects of knowledge, the test is the candidate's knowledge, relying on the usual knowledge accumulation, students who like to watch the news will have a little advantage.

2) Verbal comprehension and expression: It includes three parts: logical fill-in-the-blank, fragment reading, and comprehensive analysis, that is, the word choice and fill-in-the-blank in the language test, the summary of the topic of the fragment and the ordering of sentences, and the reading comprehension of the article, which tests the candidates' language comprehension and application ability.

3) Quantitative relationship: the operation of various mathematical problems, mainly the problems that will be used in practical work.

4) Judgment and reasoning: including four types of questions: graphical reasoning, definition judgment, logical judgment, and analogical reasoning, which test candidates' logical judgment ability.

5) Data analysis: including graphic questions, ** questions and text material questions, which examines the candidates' ability to analyze the information contained in various forms of materials, and the ability to calculate and process such information.

2. Arguments:

2) Comprehensive analysis questions: The questions require a comprehensive analysis, understanding and evaluation of a certain point of view or problem in the material, and the questions are flexible and diverse, and they need to be considered and analyzed from multiple perspectives.

3) Propose countermeasures: Mainly examine the ability to propose and solve problems.

4) Practical writing: Write a corresponding type of official document according to the requirements of the question thousand.

The difficulty of the practical test and the argument is relative, and the difficulty of the practical test lies in the large number of questions and is not easy to complete. The difficulty of argumentation is that it is difficult to quantify one's level of learning (i.e., scores). The test is a tight time and heavy task, so you can't do the questions according to your own inertial thinking, and there will be some skills in the textbook or online class, which need to be mastered by the candidates.

In addition, it takes a lot of practice to improve the speed of doing the questions.

Most of the partners feel that it is easier to improve the score of the test, so they spend a lot of time on the brushing questions of the test, and ignore the preparation for the exam, after all, the essay needs to be written, and the final result is often:

The score of the practical test is not high, the score of the argument is also very poor, the effect of the review is not great, and the frustration is full.

Therefore, whether it is a line test or a review of arguments, you have to use skill, brushing questions is important, but using the right method and strategy is equally important. If you want me to say, the line test and the argument are actually difficult, but everyone's learning foundation is different, and it varies from person to person, so the standard of the test is to brush the real questions to see your basic level.

For example, you can brush two sets of exam questions from previous years on the public examination app, and finally look at your actual level according to the score. What are the shortcomings of the argument?

In fact, review and preparation is the process of making up for your own shortcomings, according to your own weak links, to decide whether you want to register for classes or self-study, according to your own time to make a review plan, in terms of review and preparation time, 3 months is the most appropriate.

Beginner Stage: Lay the foundation. Intermediate stage: special breakthrough. Advanced stage: summary and induction.

In terms of the time allocation of the test and the argument, it is best to prepare together, no one can be left behind, and it is necessary to form a habit, especially in the advanced stage, it is best to learn the test in the morning and the argument in the afternoon, so that this mode of thinking can continue until the examination room!

If your own foundation in the bai language is relatively good, it will be easier to review the arguments.

If you are a science student, you have a particularly good sense of the questions on the number of class rights, and it will be easier to review the line test.

The difficulty of these two is relative to each person, and the main test is numerical reasoning, number operation, graphical reasoning, logical reasoning, verbal comprehension, common sense judgment, data analysis and other parts.

The essay examination mainly tests the basic ability that the candidate should have to engage in the work of the institution. It mainly includes reading comprehension ability, comprehensive analysis ability, proposal and problem solving ability, work execution ability and writing ability. Everyone's expertise is different, and the difficulty is different.

I've encountered a question before: Which is more difficult, 75+ or 80+?

It's a match for the nature of this place. Inside.

But with a hundred people, the answer is not unanimous.

For example, I, Gongkova, mathematics, physics and chemistry are quite stable, and the line test is 60+ casually, but it is only 75+ after systematic practice and study.

Shen Zhu is really pitted, the first national examination was only 38 points, struggled many times, worked hard, and finally only 75+.

In a word, you are willing to learn, work hard to learn, and there is no such thing as saying no.

Whether it is difficult or not, it is all "thought" by oneself.

The eight universal points of the argument can only be used as a reference, and should not be rigidly copied.

The copy of the test is fundamental, and the argument rises to the level of thought! Relative to du, I personally feel that the argument is more difficult, but from the amount of questions, the amount of questions in the line test is larger, the coverage is relatively wide, in the short term, it is difficult to improve, and the accumulation of knowledge in the usual test is completely tested, and the argument is better grasped in the short term, which is larger than the line test to improve. However, this is also on a case-by-case basis.

Essay review skills.

Pay attention to accumulation. Usually look at the people**, half-moon talk and the like, especially the editorial section, which will help to cultivate the language habit of being suitable for the right to answer the argument.

Pay attention to answering skills.

There are also answering skills, it is recommended that you buy a copy of the textbook of "Arguments" and take a look, which is all introduced. There is also a real question to go to the 91up argument module to simulate the real questions, they also have a mobile phone client, and you can also look at the practice before going to bed. A good handwriting will leave a good impression on the examiner when answering the essay.

The argument is very subjective, and the score will naturally be slightly higher if you have a good impression. Moreover, the writing speed is fast, which can save time for answering, and virtually increase the time reference for thinking for yourself.

Hello, Zhonggong Education is at your service.

Administrative Vocational Aptitude Test.

The administrative vocational aptitude test mainly tests the ability and quality that must be possessed by the candidates to engage in the work of state organs. The test paper mainly includes: perceptual speed and accuracy, quantitative relationship, judgment and reasoning, verbal comprehension and expression, data analysis, etc.

The structure of the Category A test is as follows: Quantitative Relationship, Judgment and Reasoning, Verbal Comprehension and Expression, and Data Analysis.

The structure of the B-type test is as follows: perceptual speed and accuracy, quantitative relationship, judgment and reasoning, verbal comprehension and expression, and data analysis.

The structure of the question category C is as follows: quantitative relationship, judgment and reasoning, verbal comprehension and expression, and data analysis.

The "Essay" mainly tests the candidate's reading comprehension ability, implementation ability, problem-solving ability and written expression ability through the analysis, generalization, refinement, and processing of the given materials.

The points of the argument and the line test are different, and the difficulty varies from person to person.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask questions from Zhonggong Education Enterprises.

BAI Civil Service Exam Preparation Specialist DU

Answer your questions!

This varies from person to person.

For candidates with deep writing skills, DAO is better at controlling words, and may find it easier to learn to apply for arguments.

However, for candidates who have a solid basic knowledge and a wide range of knowledge, it is easier to learn than the line test.

In the early stage of the review, it is recommended to carry out the test and the essay at the same time, if after the review, you feel that there are some sections that you can't improve no matter how you review, then focus on the sections that you think have the most room for improvement, and carry out targeted intensive training.