Which is better, Core 2E8400 or Q6600 I see that the price is about the same

Compare their different parameters.

The E8400 manufacturing process is 45nm. Less power consumption. Whereas, Q6 is 65nm.

The e84 frequency is 3000 1333 333....And Q62400 1066 266....

E84 L2 is L24MB*2

Personally, I recommend using Q6Better performance...And after that, 4 cores are absolutely mainstream. The word of mouth is also good. Although the Q6's overclocking ability is not as noticeable as that of the E84. But multitasking is highly recommended.

The frequency of dual-core is high, and there are many processing cores for 4-core, depending on what you need.

If you are an enthusiast and often change hardware, you can buy a dual-core E8400 first to deal with ordinary data speed points.

If you are a game lover, or you are not ready to change it immediately after buying this computer, then buy 4 cores, multi-core is more useful for playing games, and there will be more software that supports multi-core processing in the future.

For now, the E8400 is more powerful in playing games But don't forget, quad-core is the development trend.

Force. For games like GTA4, the advantage of multi-core is obvious

The overall performance is in order: Q6600> Q8200> E8500.

Q8200 parameters:

The main frequency, the external frequency is 333MHz, the frequency doubling is 7 times, the production process is 45nm, and the L2 cache is 4MB.

Advantages: low power consumption, low heat generation, more power saving, support instruction set.

Q6600 parameters:

Main frequency, external frequency 266MHz, frequency doubling 9 times, production process 65 nm, secondary 8MB.

Pros: The Q6600 has a higher default clock frequency than the Q8200, and it is 9 times the frequency, so the Q6600's overclocking performance is also better than the Q8200. In addition, the L2 cache is twice as high as that of the Q8200, so the performance for gaming and rendering is much improved.

E8500 parameters:

Main frequency, external frequency 333MHz, frequency doubling, production process 45nm, L2 cache 6MB.

Pros: Because the E8500 has a high default clock speed and multiplier, it has better overclocking capabilities than the Q6600 and Q8200, and it is more advantageous to play single-threaded games.

Summary: Both Q8200 and Q6600 are designed with quad-core and four-thread, and multitasking is stronger than E8500, so in terms of multi-threaded applications, codec, and 3D rendering, quad-core is better.

Attached is a ladder diagram:

The overall performance is ranked from strongest to weakest Q6600》Q8200》E8500 Although Q8200 and Q6600 are both quad-core processors, but because the default frequency of Q6600 is slightly higher than that of Q8200 (Q6600 is, Q8200 is, and Q6600's L2 cache is twice that of Q8200, so Q66 is significantly better than Q82 in terms of overall performance, and Q8200's only advantage is that it uses 45nm technology and generates less heat. Both CPUs are much stronger for multitasking than the E8500.

It is based on the 454nm process, which is stronger than the Q6600 on the surface. In practice, the Q6600 is relatively strong. It has a higher clock speed and more dozen L2 caches.

Q66 is higher than Q82. The E8500 is the most frequent of the three. And it's 45nm, but it's dual-core.

If it is a cartographic suggestion, Q66 2The drawing mainly depends on the graphics card, in fact, the CPU is second to the graphics card, it is recommended to choose a professional graphics card, 7800GTX+ is the model that is about to be eliminated. If you feel that the homepage card is unaffordable, it is recommended to choose an AMD card, thinking that the A card has higher floating-point computing power and renders better results.

General card HD4850 or 4870 1000-2000 yuan Professional card FX4600 8000-20000 yuan.

Use Q6600, the advantages of multi-core CPU for multi-process task processing are obvious, playing large-scale 3D games mainly depends on the graphics card, CPU is secondary, Q6600's CPU with 9800GTX+ graphics card can almost play all the games, if you open more online games, the graphics card only needs to be above 9600GT level, so it is recommended to choose 4-core CPU, after all, the future development direction is still multi-core, Multi-core optimizations will be much more than dual-core processors in the future.

This is an evaluation of E8400, Q6600, and Q8200, which is more comprehensive, and the landlord can take a look if he is interested.

Large-scale stand-alone 3D games are indeed stronger than E8400 at low resolution, and dual-core and quad-core are basically the same at high resolution. However, when multi-threading is required, the advantages of a 4-core processor are obvious. For example:

Convert movie formats, open multiple online games, compress various files, play games while listening, and so on.

It's pure layman's talk to say that a dozen more mini-games are played together at the same time, and is the purpose of the computer just to play games? I usually have 3 QQ open for a long time, 4 3D online games hanging, and Xun Lei ** movies. Sometimes I have to watch movies or listen to songs, and sometimes I have to switch ** and look up things on the Internet.

I imagine that this is not a rare situation for me, in this case would you still say that the e8400 is stronger than the 4-core processor? Besides, can't you see the direction of development in the future? The focus of inter in the future must be on the quad-core processor, the dual-core is definitely going to withdraw from the market, and the development direction of the software will also give priority to optimizing the quad-core processor, like this high-tech product must look forward, and it is not possible to blindly pursue cost performance.

Personally, I think it's better to use an i7 quad-core processor than both.

Of course, it's a quad-core Q8 series. . .

They are all very old products, why use them?

Use e86 for gaming, Q8 for multitasking

Some say that the front-end bus of 4 cores will be distributed to each core less than that of dual cores. Who is it. Misleading you.

Play games with AMD

Everyone on the earth knows it.

There is no need to test it at all,E8 and E6 except for a slight increase in cache,Power consumption is a little smaller,There is no difference,The same frequency is absolutely not felt any difference。

Q and E are not fundamentally different except for the number of cores, and the coprocessor architecture will soon appear, and then you will know how rubbish the current undifferentiated multi-core architecture is for general-purpose processors.

By the way, Intel sells some money-scamming products with a large cache every time it converts processes, but the architecture has not changed at all.

What evaluation do you see?,I went to the Pacific Ocean to see the E8500 is 5% higher than the 3G E6850 frequency,The cache is also large,But the performance is only improved by less than 10%,This is also called comprehensive transcendence?

If you are playing games, then it is recommended that you go to the E8500. Why is it good?

1 If you just play the game, E8500

The main frequency is higher, L2 cache.

Larger (6m), these 2 points are important to improve gaming performance. And the main frequency of Q6600.

The L2 cache is smaller than that of the E8500. Another important point is the E8500

Supports the SSE4 instruction set, while the Q6600 is supported

This SSE4 instruction set is not supported. This SSE4 instruction set has a lot of optimizations for the game and is also a great help to improve the game.

2e8500

It is made by 45 nanometers. The Q6600 is made with a 65-meter manufacturing process. The E8500 is built with more advanced construction and enhanced performance.

3 Although E8500

It is dual-core and Q6600

It's quad-core, but the current mainstream games have better optimization for dual-core, and there are very few optimizations for quad-core. So the E8500 plays games better than the Q6600. (There are a lot of tests, you can check them yourself).

The 4Q6600 is a quad-core one, and the quad-core can only be advantaged by the performance in multi-tasking. For home use, the dual-core is completely competent, so it is better to choose E8500.

Hope it helps!