If the funds were sufficient, would the outcome of the First Sino Japanese War be reversed?

It can only be said that it is unlikely to be reversed, even if there are enough shells, but whether it can turn the tide of the war depends on the performance of both sides.

At that time, the Qing Dynasty's idea was to close off the country, which was too natural, and Japan mobilized the whole country to seek a breakthrough and liberate its country from lack of resources, so the war would not be reversed.

It can only be said that it is possible to win, there are enough shells, then Japan's combined fleet will definitely not be a ship without losses, but whether it can turn the tide of the war depends on the play of both sides.

It can only be said that it is possible to win, there are enough shells, especially flowering shells, then Japan's combined fleet will definitely not be a ship without losses, but whether it can turn the tide of the war depends on the performance of both sides.

It is unlikely to be reversed, after all, fighting a war is not only a matter of financial resources, but also the existence of various military and political problems. As far as China is concerned, there is no international status, there is no friendly countries to help, and everyone is thinking about how to get a piece of the pie. Therefore, a heads-up fight against a group is doomed to failure.

No, the First Sino-Japanese War was not limited to a lack of funds, but also because of the failure of the policy, backwardness will be beaten, and the feudal mentality is destined to be eliminated.

Whether a war can be won depends not only on the financial resources of both sides, but also on manpower. Even if the Qing had sufficient financial resources during the First Sino-Japanese War, corruption and weakness within the Qing Dynasty would have led to the defeat of the war.

The sufficiency of funds will not be reversed, because the defeat of the First Sino-Japanese War was not only a lack of funds, but also the inevitable result of backward technology and the isolation of the country.

The experience that needs to be learned is to improve the capability of the country in Paichun, to raise the military strength of the country that is buried in the round height, not to adopt a policy of closing the country to the outside world, and to strengthen exchanges with foreign countries and to communicate more with foreign countries.

If democracy wants to be strong, it must be united, the atmosphere of officialdom is very important, the development of science and technology is very important, and it needs to be brave and not afraid of sacrifice.

The country must not fall behind, and if it is backward, it will be beaten, and it must be rich and strong.

The root cause of the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War:

In 1868, through the Meiji Restoration, Japan began to embark on the road of capitalism, and its national strength became stronger day by day, and it was in urgent need of export of goods and capital to the outside world.

However, as an island country, Japan lacks domestic resources, has a narrow market, and the remnants of feudalism at home and the acuteness of various contradictions in the period of social transition, so the Japanese ruling circles headed by the emperor are eager to find a way out of foreign expansion. For this reason, in 1887, Japan formulated the so-called "Qing State Conquest Strategy", which gradually evolved into a "mainland policy" centered on invading China.

The direct cause of the outbreak of the First Sino-Japanese War:

In the spring of 1894, a peasant uprising of the "Donghak Party" broke out in Korea, and Korea asked the Qing to send troops to help suppress it. Japan seized the opportunity to set a trap, and the day after the Qing army entered Korea, Japan immediately sent a large number of troops into Korea to occupy important military areas, and on July 25, it undeclared war, brazenly provoking a war of aggression against China.