Interview with Sun Qingwei Have archaeologists found the legendary Xia Dynasty

At present, the excavated ancient tombs are only in the Shang Dynasty in the early days, and no cultural relics of the Xia Dynasty have been found. Although many historical classics are recorded, they are all vague and need to be sorted out, and it is also necessary to continue scientific research and excavation.

Erlitou culture is the culture of the Xia Dynasty.

I've found it, do I want to report it to you?

The Xia Dynasty existed. There are many reasons why archaeology has not found too much evidence: 1. Environment, the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River are warm and humid, which is not suitable for the preservation of ancient relics; 2. War, as we all know, northern China has experienced many wars, large and small turmoil in history, and none of the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River has escaped.

Therefore, the historical relics have also been completely destroyed; 3. The destruction of subsequent dynasties. The Shang dynasty will certainly have carried out physical or cultural destruction of the previous Xia dynasty; 4. The Xia Dynasty did not leave many relics or records, and a batch was destroyed in the Shang Dynasty, and another batch was destroyed in the wars of later generations. Therefore, Confucius once sighed that "there is no shortage of berries".

Later, the Qi Kingdom was destroyed, and there were no living fossils left in the Xia Dynasty. It can be said that before the Han Dynasty, there were no remnants of the Xia Dynasty in the world. 5. The Xia Dynasty actually left us one thing, which we still use today, that is, the Xia calendar, which we often call the lunar calendar or the lunar calendar.

Of course, the Xia calendar or lunar calendar is not a lunar calendar, but a luni-solar calendar, which is the legacy left to us by the Xia Dynasty, and of course it has been revised in all dynasties.

Archaeologists find the legendary Xia.

China has a rich cultural history and is an ancient civilization with a history of 5,000 years, so many archaeologists like to study these ancient histories. I have to admit that with the continuous deepening of archaeologists' research, we have become more and more aware of the history of our own country, and we have more and more reverence. However, the "Xia Dynasty", which was the first dynasty to appear in the public eye in historical records, has not been recognized by archaeologists, because no historical relics about the Xia Dynasty have been found until nowThe story of Dayu's water control is actually ** in the Xia Dynasty, but archaeologists have not found that there is a flood outbreak in the Xia Dynasty. And now the story of Dayu's water control is more of a mythological story, this part verifies the conjecture of archaeologists, that is, is Dayu a mythical character? This story is also a story that everyone made up?

We can't consider this explanation, because everyone is not in history and there is no way to verify it.

Until now, archaeologists are still studying, but there is no direct evidence about the remains of the Xia Dynasty. And every time something that may appear, the archaeologists have to go through a stimulating discussion within themselves, and neither side can convince the other, soArchaeologists have not publicly stated what the remains of the Xia Dynasty were, or what they deduced.

Ancient Chinese history is vast and profound, and it is precisely because of the controversy that it seems more mysterious. We are glad that this is our homeland, a country with a rich cultural history.

The Xia Dynasty is not recognized by archaeologists because no remains have been found.

Because many stories of the Xia Dynasty have not been confirmed by paleologists.

Because at that time there was no clear system and concept of the state.

This historical issue needs to be studied, and history is not well versed.

No historical relics of the Xia Dynasty have been discovered.

The story of Dayu's water control is actually ** in the Xia Dynasty,

It is not recognized because there is no clear evidence that the Xia Dynasty once existed.

The main reason is that there is no way to find evidence in the archaeological community, or some documents record the existence of the Xia Dynasty, and many times the Xia Dynasty is just a legend that exists in our upper and lower 5,000 years.

After all, archaeology does not tell the history of our country through human words, but tells historians our history based on the cultural relics unearthed on the land of our country and some documents left behind.

If there is no basis, no matter how sure we are that all this exists, we can't change the views of those historians, so the Xia Dynasty in history experienced such a thing.

Although everyone thinks that the Three Emperors and the Five Emperors and the Xia Dynasty all existed, there is really no historical and archaeological basis to confirm our view. This is also a very uncomfortable thing for us.

But since some people believe that getting off the bus exists, it must be because he still leaves some traces in history. For example, the "Book of Shang" of the Western Zhou Dynasty and the "Historical Records" of Sima Qian of the Western Han Dynasty both describe the Xia Dynasty, and the content is roughly the same, so I think the Xia Dynasty of the Xia Dynasty still has a partial basis.

Archaeologists are also actively excavating, and at the Erlitou site in Yanshi, Henan, archaeologists believe that this was the capital of the middle and late Xia Dynasty, but it is not certain whether it was the Shang Dynasty or the Xia Dynasty, and it is not known.

Because after all, it has been four or five thousand years since now, and too many historical relics have been covered by time, but since he existed, he will definitely leave clues, and we continue to look for some traces of the Xia Dynasty through time. In the end, we can confirm the existence of the Xia Dynasty for sure.

The Xia Dynasty was destroyed by Yin Shang, and the extermination policy was adopted, and the information of the beginning of the Xia Dynasty was completely destroyed, just like Xiang Yu destroyed Qin and burned down the Afang Palace, and Qin's literary and historical materials were preserved only when Liu Bang entered Xianyang first! And we now understand the Xia Dynasty from the side history, such as "Chu Ci", "Classic of Mountains and Seas" and other limited resources to understand. And about the official history of the Xia Dynasty, the capital, the sacrificial artifacts have been destroyed, and the capital of the Xia Dynasty is a ruin.

After a heavy period of time, from archaeology and interpretation of the Xia Dynasty, this is even more difficult, the key is that there is no direct evidence that is difficult to convince in the ruins!

It's not that it's not recognized, it's that the reasons and reasons for the recognition are not found.

The reason why there is such a statement is because the ruins of the Xia Dynasty have not yet been found.

The Xia Dynasty in history, the conclusion of history! What archaeological community would dare not admit it? Nothing!

Because they feel that the current archaeological evidence is not enough to prove that the excavation is the Xia Dynasty, they just guess that it is a certain tribe of the Xia Dynasty.

Because there are very few records about the Xia Dynasty in history, and the capital of the Xia Dynasty has never been found.

Because it's too early, there is nothing left in this period, there is no way to confirm without cultural relics, and literal things are meaningless, just like Atlantis, no matter how well it is said, what is the use, there is nothing left, it can only be regarded as a legend.

Because there are very few records of the Xia Dynasty in the history books, and the things excavated are not enough to prove that they are the Xia Dynasty.

How is it possible not to be recognized? It's just that I haven't found the ruins of the Xia Dynasty.

You say that if there is a Xia Dynasty, there will be a Xia Dynasty? What about the evidence? Legendary? Fairy tales? Archaeological things or circulating texts are the evidence.

Because there are very few records about the Xia Dynasty ruins in history, the archaeological community has been studying the Xia Dynasty ruins under the condition of speculation.

There is no evidence that the Xia Dynasty existed, there are no Xia Dynasty writings, no Xia Dynasty books, and even the ruins of the Xia Dynasty have not been found.

The Shang Dynasty had oracle bone inscriptions, the Xia Dynasty did not leave evidence that could prove its existence, and it would not be recognized in orthodox archaeology, and the history of ancient Egypt was much earlier than that of China, and the Mao Society recognized it by most archaeologists, that is, there were hieroglyphs left.

Because the ruins of the Xia Dynasty have not been found, they are not called by the archaeological community.

There is no evidence to prove that it is the remains of the Xia Dynasty, and a large number of bronzes have been unearthed, which is enough to show that Erlitou is not the Xia Dynasty. The production of bronze ware requires metallurgical technology, manufacturing technology, precision formulas, and art and craftsmanship as support, so the Erlitou civilization can only be a relic of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty. It's a bit far-fetched to pull it to the Xia Dynasty.

Because the Shang Dynasty was not a Han regime. How do you prove that the Xia Dynasty was a Han Chinese regime? Secondly, I insist that the Aryan branch of the Middle East has entered the country.

Secondly, it is unknown whether Sanxingdui was the holy place of the Xia Dynasty that year. History is too messy. Combined with the authentic logic of the Han people, it is difficult to find much to discover.

If it is proved that the Chinese Emperor was once ruled by nomads and even white people in the Middle East. History has to be rewritten? a

The controversy is too big, or wait for someone to pass the Xia Dynasty once to prove it!

How long has Chinese culture been formed, why does it have to be recognized by Western scientific fools?

What can Xia Chao explain, in addition to bragging about how long his history is, and then taking a few broken jars out of a glass cover to sell tickets, and a few brick families have to write articles out of nothing to cheat some funds and manuscript fees, which is not helpful to social progress at all, and studying modern science and technology is the right way.

In the history of ancient China, there is a slip of the tongue, and the beginning is like this: Tang Yao, Yu Shun, Xia, Shang and Zhou, the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period were chaotic, the Qin and Han Kingdoms were merged into two Jin, and the Southern and Northern Dynasties were the ......This slip of the tongue allowed the source of the Chinese nation to start with the Three Emperors and Five Emperors, and then the Xia Dynasty, the Shang Dynasty, and the Zhou Dynasty, all the way down to this day. We often say that we are a 5,000-year-old civilization, and the 5,000 years here are calculated from the Three Emperors and Five Emperors, from Tang Yao and Yu Shun.

Although our textbooks take great pains to refer to the Xia Dynasty as the first dynasty of Chinese civilization, there is no archaeological evidence. After a hundred years of archaeology and decades of large-scale land acquisition and development, the ground has been dug all over, and no clues of the existence of the "Xia Dynasty" can be found. The so-called "Erlitou" is actually the same period as the Shang Dynasty, and the Erlitou culture is just a very primitive tribal cultural site, which is not a "civilization".

Many people are denying the existence of the Xia Dynasty, but the large number of bronzes unearthed since then show that there really was a Zhou regime in Chinese history after the Shang Dynasty. Through the study of these excavated cultural relics, we find that the Shang and Zhou regimes are of the nature of inheritance, and the so-called inheritance is not only that one regime replaces another regime in the same land, but that the culture between the two regimes is continuous.

Before the Xia Dynasty, there was a history of about 4,000 years, and because of the age, we have not found any original documents and records, so there are many people who doubt whether there is a history of the Xia Dynasty. In recent years, through the study of the "Xia, Shang and Zhou Dynasty Project", we have a new understanding of the development of politics, economy, culture and other aspects. In view of this, the Xia Dynasty has entered the Bronze Age of the Neolithic Age from the excavated sites, and has mastered metallurgy and casting technology, so the Xia Dynasty exists, but it has not been systematically excavated.

Personally, I don't think the Xia Dynasty existed, there are not many histories we can know about the Xia Dynasty, most of them are legends, and most of the tribes during the Xia Dynasty may not have formed a complete country, so the Xia Dynasty may not be true.

Xia, Shang and Zhou are all famous ancient countries, why does the Xia Dynasty not exist? It is not said that the Zhou Dynasty and the Shang Dynasty did not exist, and when it comes to the Zhou Dynasty and the Shang Dynasty, many things can be said, it must be because the records of the Xia Dynasty are legends, and there is no real and conclusive record.

However, unlike the Shang and Zhou dynasties, there is no archaeological evidence from the Xia dynasty to this day. In our written records, the Xia Dynasty has its own characteristics, and at the same time, the Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties also have a inheritance relationship, so we can't dig out a civilization before the Shang and Zhou dynasties and say that it is the Xia Dynasty.

Because there is no archaeological evidence to prove its existence, and there is no historical record, many people think that he just does not exist, it is just a legend.

Because unlike the Shang Dynasty and the Zhou Dynasty, the records about the Xia Dynasty are all legends, and the specific records are not very clear, and there are not many excavated ancient books and ancient relics that can prove the existence of the Xia Dynasty.

I think that the Xia Dynasty existed, because there are some records of the founder and last ruler of the Xia Dynasty, and as for some people who believe that the Xia Dynasty did not exist, the reason may be that the Xia Dynasty has not yet been obtained.

Because it should exist, I don't think it can be made up out of thin air when there is such a statement, because it is not easy for the ancients.

Not really, I think the Xia Dynasty is real, because before the Xia Dynasty, our country had a history of about 4,000 years, in recent years, through the study of the "Xia, Shang and Zhou Dynasty Project", we have a new understanding of the development of politics, economy, culture and other aspects, so the Xia Dynasty exists

Will it be flooded, or destroyed by floods?

After all, the Yellow River used to flood a lot...

According to historical documents, the Xia Dynasty must have existed in Chinese history, but because there are no definite relics and writings unearthed, the Xia Dynasty has not been recognized by many people, and the controversy is great. The Xia Dynasty was the first hereditary dynasty recorded in Chinese history books.

Yes, there are archaeological sites.

Those who say no are from the old point of view, and they are foreigners.

Yes, the first generation in Chinese history.

That's the question that foreigners ask.

When the oracle bone inscription of the Xia Dynasty was discovered.

I think foreigners still dare to say that there is no Xia Dynasty.

Before the Shang Dynasty oracle bone inscription was excavated.

Some people say that there is no Shang Dynasty.

Long knowledge.