Why are most science students calmer than liberal arts students?

Science students andLiberal Arts studentsThe difference is a cliché. Their differences are reflected in various aspects, such as the things they have experienced together, or the same places they have walked, and they are completely different styles in their respective expressions.

Scientific thinking emphasizes a strong logic, which is to use the most concise and fastest method to find the answer to the problem. Often influenced by this kind of thinking, most science students can think quickly, quickly grasp the essence of things, and analyze things first, so they will be calmer when encountering things. Under normal circumstances, for example, when encountering the same thing, they analyze the cause of the problem more calmly than liberal arts students, grasp the essence of the matter, and solve it in the most concise way.

Regardless, science and liberal arts students have their own strengths and weaknesses. Liberal arts students appear more romantic and lyrical, as well as more poetic. Sometimes, the starting point of liberal arts students is too idealistic and irrational, and the professionalism is not strong.

In this regard, science students tend to appear more calm and reasonable, and their problem-solving ideas are more straightforward.

Of course, the shortcomings of science students are also obvious, and sometimes, their thinking does not beat around the bush, but seems to be very straightforward and abrupt, and they do not care much about the feelings of others. For example, science students may learn to feel with their hearts, learn to see things from other people's perspectives, and learn to cultivate their own creativity. Liberal arts students learn to respect data and facts, learn to think logically and rigorously, and learn to focus on solutions.

Liberal arts students, when faced with some difficult problems, they will hesitate, unable to deal with the problem in time, and ask others for help and have no opinions. It is not uncommon for a problem to be distracted from another task before it has been resolved. And when they find it too difficult, they will choose to give up.

When faced with some difficult problems, science students will use a calm attitude and a rational mind to carefully analyze the problems and quickly find the entry point to solve the problems. I will always think about how to solve the problem, and the more difficult the problem, the more challenging it is.

This is related to the learning content of science students, because science students use data more to speak, focusing on rationality, and the habits developed in the learning process have also subtly changed their way of thinking, while liberal arts students are more focused on the analysis of perceptuality in the learning process, and there is no standard answer, the same thing is different in the eyes of people with different personalities, and this way also affects the way of thinking of liberal arts students in life, so science students will be more rational and calm than when they encounter things.

Most science students are more rational when encountering things, use logical thinking to reason, and do things more rigorously, while liberal arts students use language to analyze things more and compare feelings. Therefore, ** students are more calm and calm than liberal arts students.

In general, science students think rationally, while liberal arts students generally think emotionally. It's easier to be moved when encountering things, especially girls in liberal arts, who will touch the scene when they encounter some touches.

Because from the time he chooses liberal arts or science, he has already decided whether his character is rational or emotional, so it is said that science students are calmer than liberal arts students, because science students are more rational and liberal arts students are more emotional.

Rational and scientific analysis of problems, liberal arts students sensibility.

Science students are not calm. It's easy to blow up the lab.

There are too many people choosing liberal arts, and the competitiveness is too great.

Colleges and universities need fewer liberal arts personnel than science majors.

The number of liberal arts students in the market demand is relatively narrow, so it is difficult to find employment after graduation.

Some of them are poor students, they choose the literature because they don't want to study science, so some school liberal arts classes are more chaotic than science classes, and they must have enough psychological preparation and self-control!

The disadvantages of studying liberal arts are split:

The degradation of logical thinking.

The disadvantage of studying liberal arts is the degradation of logical thinking, because liberal arts requires students to memorize and memorize more, and the use of logical thinking is as strong as that of science, which will cause the degradation of students' logical thinking, that is, it will affect students' learning ability.

Of course, this kind of impact is relatively small, so students don't need to pay too much attention to this drawback, but they can't ignore it either.

Universities recruit fewer majors.

Another point is also the impact of studying liberal arts, that is, there are relatively few majors recruited by universities, because compared with science, there are fewer majors recruited by universities, so often liberal arts students are more affected by their majors when they apply for universities, which is the second disadvantage of studying liberal arts for students' learning.

Therefore, students must make the right choice according to their objective learning situation when dividing the arts and sciences into subjects.

From the point of view of employment prospects.

From the perspective of employment prospects, at present, more enterprises in our country have more demand for science students, and science students can choose more positions, while for liberal arts students, there is no such advantage, and the employment of liberal arts students is also relatively narrow, which is the third disadvantage of studying liberal arts to students.

This is a point that students should consider when choosing liberal arts and sciences, because the ultimate goal of studying is to find a good job for themselves.

If you want to learn, you can improve your self-cultivation, and you have to write ** in the study of science, you must have a good writing to do that, and the literati sometimes debate is not the opponent will suffer a lot, and the adults around me like articulate children, so there are still a lot of benefits to learning.

You need to learn, and it's better to have your own thinking, history and geography can be learned, but don't look at politics (it's all washed nao). Bacon said, "The reading of history makes a man wise, the reading of poetry makes a man beautiful, mathematics makes a man thorough, science makes a man profound, ethics makes a man dignified, and the study of logic and rhetoric makes a man eloquent: everything that is learned becomes character."

One of my eldest cousins used to be a science student in a key high school, and now he is studying at Zhejiang University, which is similar to you, and my cousin's experience is that you must not give up liberal arts, and you can grasp composition in Chinese, speak English, and the rest can depend on your mastery.

I don't know if I can help you.

No, as long as the focus is on science subjects, it is still necessary to study liberal arts subjects.