Kodak C140 vs Fujifilm A175, which is better?

Both of these machines are low-end machines, but the CCD of Fujifilm A175 is larger than that of Kodak C140, so the picture quality will be better (choose a camera to give priority to image quality), in addition, Fuji's style is better than Kodak, and the workmanship is more exquisite than Kodak, so it is recommended to buy Fujifilm A175.

Buy Fujifilm A175, Kodak is a sunset brand, maybe Kodak won't make digital cameras tomorrow.

Those who buy Canon generally fancy the soft color, those who buy Nikon generally fancy the sharp color, those who buy Binder generally fancy the noble background, those who buy Olympus generally fancy the appearance, those who buy Ricoh generally fancy the old optics, those who buy Laika are generally very rich, those who buy Kodak are generally anti-Japanese, those who buy Fuji are generally blind to the parameters, those who buy Sony are generally fooled by advertising, those who buy Panasonic are generally ignorant, and those who buy Casio are generally extremely ignorant. Those who buy patriots generally support domestic products, and those who buy BenQ generally have their brains in water.

Buying a Samsung is non-mainstream Hahan's. So it's best to still be Canon and Nikon, and many professionals and journalists also use these two brands.

I'm in favor of buying Fuji's, let's not talk about anything else, just talk about the performance ratio of the two, Fuji's is more cost-effective than Kodak's, pixels, CCD size and screen.

These two entry-level cameras are good,A175 is higher in terms of pixels alone,But CCDThe size of the two get the same picture quality,I've used Kodak and Fujifilm's other cameras,I feel that Kodak has done a better job in terms of color reproduction and clarity of the picture,I personally recommend Kodak,If you have other needs, it depends on your preferences,Hehe。

I bought A175 I think it's OK, the battery is the previous 1600, and there is still electricity after shooting more than 100, which is very useful for going out to play, and it is really not possible to buy two Nanfu can also take dozens of big photos, if the lithium battery is out of power, you can only do it in a hurry.

I'll take a look.

I posted some perfect night shift photos in the Zol forum, you can take a look at wyx37528747

I think Kodak M420 is more worth having, after all, there are 28mm wide angle and lithium battery optical image stabilization, only 850 yuan, which is a great advantage over these two!

It can only be said that Fujifilm A175 is more cost-effective.

These two are entry-level machines, the performance is about the same, the appearance of Fuji is better, **Kodak is cheap, about 420 yuan can be bought.

I think A175 is good, I just bought it on JD.com, and the basic functions are there, but the appearance is not very good-looking. Fujifilm is a bit of a digital professional, hehe, I don't know very well, novice.

Fujifilm's configuration is more attractive.

a175：499

c140：489.

JD.com**. The Fujifilm A175 that I just bought for two days is being trialed.

The first camera is the Little Kodak, which is very good to use, simple, easy to use, and has great results. So I have a soft spot for Kodak.

Both are good, whatever you like.

Fuji Hello! My family used to buy land...

Kodak's failure rate is higher, and Fujifilm is recommended.

The CCD and pixels of both are the same,**The way is also automatic**,But Fujifilm's screen is large,High resolution,And Fujifilm supports a maximum of 8 seconds of shutter,When shooting starlight, it will be much stronger than the maximum shutter second180,A175 is recommended。

Fujifilm A175 This machine is an upgraded version of A100, with an additional intelligent scene recognition.

It is recommended that you look at the A225, which has 200W more pixels than the A175.

The cost of restocking is the same, so it's about the same. Of course, the other features are pretty much the same.

I chose between these 2 models and finally chose 175

Advantages: cost-effective, quality and appearance are passable.

There are also many disadvantages: power consumption is terrible [even if the new battery takes a few photos, it will obviously drop the small grid power]**The color is dark The color is very unshowy, but it is worthy**[This should be a good choice, don't expect too much].

Kodak C180I haven't used it I don't know,Don't buy that A175,The 175 I just bought is not as good as the imaging effect of my mobile phone200W,The background is gray and can't be seen,It seems to be raining on a sunny day。

Cameras at this price,The effect of these two models is almost the same,The new model Kodak is now selling is C140,C613 has been off the market early,** are less than 500 yuan,It depends on your preference for brand and appearance。

The Kodak M420 beats out differently considering absolutely.

Addendum: Downstairs fell down and said I, Kodak with optical image stabilization, other straps? Kodak lens is Schneider certified Is the A480 Napo lens comparable to Fujinon?

The M420 has a wide-angle 28mm Do you know how much it costs to add a wide-angle camera? Yes, everyone knows that the metal case is durable.

If you don't understand, don't slander me here, or ask other netizens such as the landlord to comment.

Any one will do, depending on which style you like, the low-end card machine is to press a shutter, and there is basically no gap compared to the ** quality. The card machine is more than the style, and the Kodak M420 upstairs is nonsense!

Definitely M420 is good M420 is compared with Fuji J250 The other 3 models are not stabilized The ** beginner photo is easy to blur all the wide angle is more practical It is estimated that this machine is not easy to buy.

Fujifilm A225 and A175 are quite cheap, but the battery is very poor, the battery life is not good, and the AA Canon A480 seems to be average.

These 3 models have no optical image stabilization, and any electronic image stabilization is deceptive.

But the Kodak M420 bar upstairs said that it is indeed a good machine, and this price is the best, and you can also look at the Fujifilm J250 and Panasonic FS6.

Kodak M420 is recommended, now it is only sold for less than 800 yuan, very cost-effective, with IS optical image stabilization and 4x optical zoom and28mm wide angle, effective pixels of 10 million, daily shooting is already very enough, you can give them a comparison on the Internet to know, these you don't choose it?

Kodak M420

Check it out here!