About iPod nano 4 and SONY NW A805, SONY NW S615, SONY NW E025F

Updated on number 2024-02-08
4 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    When it comes to sound quality, don't choose iPod, it pays attention to multi-function, and the focus is not on sound quality. Sony's sound quality is good, but the function is not as powerful as the iPod, after all, it is a Walkman hobby, and everyone will know that Sony was the king of Walkman. A805 should be discontinued,The current one is A825,In fact, the current A820,S710,E020F series don't look at the price gap,But the sound quality is actually about the same,Among themA820The series is the most expensive,But you have to know,A820 has Bluetooth,It's also MP4,The original configuration is 082 in-ear headphones,Of course, these functions are a little more expensive,Then S710 is MP4,Noise cancellation original headphones。

    Finally, e020 is pure ***, and the original match is 804, which is the most pitiful. Its practical headphones are the same, the sound quality of the three machines is about the same, of course, the psychological effect will of course think that the A820 series is the best, because the most expensive price is this series.

    Generally speaking, it depends on whether you want to buy P3 or P4, P4 recommends buying the S710 series, and you don't have to pay for unnecessary Bluetooth. Of course, you pay attention to the best features, and it's better to choose the iPod, Sony's ** conversion format is very cumbersome, and the transfer speed is very slow! P3 I don't think you need to choose, now there are very few pure ** P3, almost all manufacturers are numb to chase the wind P4.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Even the A806 does not dare to say that the top sound quality is the same.

    It's just that the public level is relatively high.

    If you want to spend 2000 or 3000 to buy the top one, it's still far away.

    But you mentioned 2 ***, it must be Sony's good sound quality, obviously.

    Apple doesn't have much sound quality to speak of.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Sony nw-a805 I bought it in August, and the expectations were quite high at the time, but when I got it, it felt like that, I spent more than 800 to buy it, you said you want to buy a top one, then Sony doesn't have to buy it, he is more popular, you can go and see how much Kenwood, of course, or see how much money there is, the top *** is not lower than 3000, if you want to buy about 1000, then Sony is enough for you. It's really troublesome for him to pass on songs, but maybe it's also unique. This thing can't be seen or heard.

    The specialty store is still 1599, it is recommended to buy it online.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It's not garbage, it's just that the sound is relatively light, and there is still a gap between the sound quality and brands such as Sony. However, this brand is indeed quite controversial. In my opinion, it is still necessary to have reservations about its sound quality, after all, Apple does not have the same long-term audio technology accumulation as Sony and other manufacturers.

    2.Since there is even a D50 flying saucer upstairs, maybe you are not sensitive enough to the sound, because the gap between the flying saucer D50 and the iPod is a matter of one ear.

    3.This can't be said that the nano is bad, it can only be said that the nano is suitable for you, and the one that suits you is the best.

    The sound style is basically the same as the A828, and at this point, I think the upstairs may be in YY. The tuning of these two Sony models is the same, and the sound quality is not much different, the S544 is positioned at the lower end, and the headphones are poor. And it's more chicken when it is put outside.

    5.Regardless of the origin **, there is no difference in the quality of manufacturing in China and Malaysia.

    6.My personal recommendation is A828, which is more pleasing than S544, and the quality of the original headphones is also good. However, if you like the shape of the S544, you can also buy it with Xianghong. nano is not recommended.

Related questions
17 answers2024-02-08

Mingxuan 5750 Terminator 1024M Full Public Edition Design 1024M 128bit DDR5 Video Memory Specifications Original board from ati Workmanship The quality is very good. >>>More

9 answers2024-02-08

This one. I don't seem to be able to say it clearly. Of course I'm only13 Ah !! >>>More

11 answers2024-02-08

If you need to be stylish, fun, and keep your value not outdated, then the iPhone 4 >>>More

6 answers2024-02-08

I'm an Apple clerk.

The sync issue you mentioned is now gone. >>>More

15 answers2024-02-08

Personally, I don't think this IQ has much to do with learning, it really has to be related to IQ, depending on how you want to develop in the future, it's really like the first floor is just a matter of efficiency in mastering new knowledge per unit of time. Isn't there also a saying that diligence can make up for clumsiness, and now most people's IQ is about the same, and the knowledge points examined in the third year of high school are only a big synthesis of the first and second years of high school, and it is a step deeper in the thinking method, and the test is the problem of the ability to solve new problems. If you say, the first and second years of high school are good, and the third year of high school is not good, it can only mean that you will not be able to apply flexibly, this problem is indeed a little difficult for you who have just entered the third year of high school, and the third year of high school should pay special attention to a point to be able to connect the knowledge points to learn and learn to apply, as for the big math problems you said, it is not that it is particularly difficult, you must lay a good foundation, analyze the meaning of the topic clearly, and do it little by little, just do it! >>>More