The Relationship between Practice and Truth 20, The Relationship between Practice and Truth

Practice is the criterion for testing truth.

Answer: The reason why practice can be used as the test criterion of truth is determined by the nature of truth and the characteristics of practice. First of all, from the perspective of the nature of truth, the nature of truth is that the subjective and the objective are consistent and consistent, and the nature of truth requires that there must be something that can link subjective cognition with objectivity, and contrast, as the criterion of truth, it does not matter whether it is right or wrong, so it cannot be used as a test of the characteristics of the truth of cognition, therefore, the ideological theory is not the criterion of truth, but an objective thing, and it can be seen that the criterion for testing the truth of cognition can neither be the ideological theory itself nor the objective thing; Second, judging from the characteristics of practice, the characteristics of practice can meet the requirements of the nature of truth and become the only criterion for testing truth, and practice not only has the advantages of universality, but more importantly, it has the characteristics of direct reality, so that practice has become a bridge linking subjectivity and objectivity, and has become an activity in which subjectivity sees objectivity.

That is to say, if people follow a certain understanding to practice, they can lead to realistic results and turn subjective things into objective things. Generally speaking, if the original expected result is achieved in practice, then the person's understanding is confirmed, and it can be called the truth knowledge; If it fails, and it is not caused by something other than cognition, it is a false cognition. Therefore, the direct reality of practice is characterized by the main basis for testing the criterion of truth.

Practice and understanding are the unity of opposites, practice is the first and the foundation of understanding, and the purpose of understanding, people must go through practice if they want to constantly gain new understanding, correctly understand objective things, and find the truth. Practice is the fundamental means to test the truth of knowledge, but because of the variability and relativity of practice itself, especially in class society, the two opposing sides will carry out completely opposite practices, so how to test practice requires a standard. Only the truth itself is objective and certain, and whether the practice is correct or not must be judged by the truth, and the truth is concrete and relative, and the truth that guides practice is also the relative truth, and only by practicing under the guidance of the relative truth can we produce new and more truth understandings and realize the transformation from relative truth to absolute truth.

The two of them are an interactive relationship, practice produces true knowledge, true knowledge has gone through years of experience, and the continuous deepening of people's practical experience has outlined the face of truth.

Practice is the only way to identify truth.

Yes***It is said that the complete sentence is the only criterion for testing the truth。"Practice is the only criterion for testing truth" is determined by the nature of truth and the characteristics of practice.

Practice is the only criterion for testing truth, and it is against two things.

It is proposed that this is to refute another absolute proposition with one absolute proposition, which is easy to mislead people's understanding. In order to prevent the proposition that practice is the only criterion for testing truth from misleading people's understanding, the Chinese philosophical community defines the only meaning here as the ultimate and fundamental meaning. However, this is only a consensus in the philosophical community, and in other fields, people still regard the only understanding of the only one, not the only one in the final sense, and it can be said that in reality, 99% of people regard the only understanding of the only as the only one, not as the only understanding of the ultimate meaning.

If we understand that practice is the only criterion for testing the truth, then it is very absurd to accept that practice is the only criterion for testing the truth. Therefore, practice is only the ultimate criterion for testing truth, and the absence of truth can also be a criterion for testing whether a new understanding is a truth.

Isn't this obvious: first theory and then practice, correct the wrong use!

Summary. Practice is the driving force for the development of understanding, practice is the only criterion for testing the truth of understanding, and practice is the ultimate goal of understanding.

Practice is the driving force for the development of understanding, practice is the only criterion for testing the truth of understanding, and practice is the ultimate goal of understanding. That's right.

From the perspective of the nature of truth, truth is people's correct reflection of objective things and their laws of development, that is, subjectivity and objectivity are in conformity. Subjective cognition cannot determine its own right or wrong, and objective things themselves do not care whether they are right or wrong, so neither of them is qualified to test the standard of truth.

The so-called testing of truth is actually a practical activity, but this kind of temporal activity has certain particularities. Marxist epistemology believes that understanding is the first in practice, whether a certain understanding is the truth or not, it must be explained and demonstrated by practice, and when the understanding is put into practice, whether the results obtained are consistent with the previous understanding directly determines whether the truth of the understanding is or not. This characteristic of the direct reality of practice is the main basis for testing the truth.

Earlier, we said that testing the truth is a special kind of practical activity, which is absolute and uncertain. First of all, its absoluteness lies in its uniqueness, and only practice can tell us whether our knowledge is true or not. Second, its uncertainty lies in the fact that we cannot regard a single practical activity, a certain kind of practical activity, as an absolute test of truth.

A single practical activity has many limitations on the test of truth, such as historical environment, social conditions, and so on. Therefore, while ensuring that practice is the only way to test truth, we should also regard the test of truth by practice as a process, a never-ending process. The One and the Eternal are one with each other.

Obviously, the dust clump has reached unity with eternity, but how do we make a decision about the truth? Is truth also historically limited? The truth of the past may not be the truth in the present, and the truth of the present may be seen as a fallacy in the future.

In this back-and-forth, we can sometimes even say that there is no absolute truth in the world, only the truth of history.

Some people often say that the truth can stand the test of practice, maybe after thousands of failed or successful tests, after a long period of practice and waiting, a certain understanding of ours is proven to be the truth or a fallacy, is this a sadness or a kind of greatness? I think different people will have different answers. Communism, as discussed in Marxism, was put into practice by Owen and others before the emergence of Marxism, but the result was a failure.

After the emergence of Marxism, it was put into practice by countries such as the Paris Commune and the Soviet Union, and the result was another failure. At present, China and other countries are still slowly advancing on the road of practicing Marxism, and as a result, some people say that it has been successful and that it has brought unprecedented prosperity to those countries, while others say that it has succeeded in form but failed in substance. Of course, Marx explained these phenomena with the theory of quantitative change and qualitative change, but he did not tell the world how qualitative change will occur when quantitative change accumulates.

Therefore, how many times we have to practice the truth, and how long it will take to practice it before we can declare the existence of this truth, I think this is also the question that we need to discuss when we test the truth.

First, practice is cognitive. The content of knowledge is generated and developed on the basis of practical activities. Only by actually transforming and transforming objects through practice can people accurately grasp the attributes, essence, and laws of objects, form a correct understanding, and guide people's practical activities with this understanding.

It is impossible to have an understanding without practice. All true knowledge originates from direct experience. A person's knowledge consists of two parts: direct experience and indirect experience.

As far as the origin of knowledge is concerned, no knowledge can be separated from direct experience. However, this does not mean that everything must be directly experienced, "I have an end to life, and there is no end to knowledge", most of a person's knowledge still comes from indirect experience, which is obtained from books and teachings. However, "what is indirect experience in me is still direct experience in man".

Fundamentally speaking, practice is the source of understanding. If you want to achieve a career, you must not only study hard, but also devote yourself to practice.

Second, practice is the driving force for the development of understanding. The needs of practice promote the generation and development of understanding, promote human scientific discoveries and technological inventions, and promote human ideological progress and theoretical innovation. Engels said:

Once there is a need for technology in society, this need will push science forward more than ten universities. "The need for practice is fundamental to the continuous development of understanding in depth and breadth. In addition, practice is the driving force for the development of understanding, which is also manifested in the fact that practice provides the means and conditions for the development of understanding, such as empirical data, experimental instruments and tools.

What is more important is that practice has transformed people's subjective world and tempered and enhanced people's ability to understand. It is precisely under the impetus of practice that people are constantly breaking through the old frame of understanding and breaking through the old thinking in their minds, causing a new leap in understanding, so that they can continue to make some guesses and make progress.

Third, practice is the purpose of understanding. People gain understanding through practice, not "hunting" or "Yaxing", not understanding for the sake of understanding, and its ultimate purpose is to serve and guide practice to meet the needs of people's life and production. The continuous innovation of natural science aims to promote greater development of technology, create richer material wealth, and bring more well-being to mankind.

The continuous innovation of the humanities and social sciences aims to understand society, understand human beings themselves, transform society, build spiritual civilization, create spiritual wealth, and promote the free and all-round development of human beings.

Fourth, practice is the only criterion for testing the truth of understanding. Truth is not self-proclaimed. "Judging whether an understanding or theory is true or not is not determined by subjective feelings, but by objectively how the result of social practice is.

The criterion of truth can only be the practice of society. That is to say, whether knowledge is true or not cannot be confirmed from the knowledge itself or from the object of knowledge, but can only be verified in practice.

First, practice is cognitive. Second, practice is the driving force for the development of understanding. Third, practice is the only criterion for testing whether an understanding is correct or not. Fourth, practice is the ultimate goal of understanding.

The objectivity of truth lies not only in the fact that the content of truth is objective, but also in the fact that the criterion of truth is also objective. The fact that practice becomes the criterion for testing truth is determined by the nature of truth and the characteristics of practice. The criterion for testing the truth of knowledge should be to be able to link the subjective with the objective and compare them, so as to determine whether the understanding conforms to the objective reality.

And the only thing that can meet this requirement is people's digital social practice. Therefore, only by testing whether people's understanding is consistent with objective reality through practice can the truth have objective certainty and withstand repeated tests. Only through practice can people directly grasp and compare the understanding that guides practice with the objective results produced by practice, so that the truth can obtain realistic evidence.

To insist that practice is the only criterion for testing truth, we must not only see the certainty of the criterion of practice, prevent and oppose idealism, skepticism and relativism that deny the criterion of truth, but also see the uncertainty of the criterion of practice.

Practice has many meanings, and the classical view is that the subjective sees the objective, including the necessity of the objective to the subjective and the necessity of the subjective to the objective.

Practice is the social activity in which people actively transform and explore all objective materials in the real world.

The basic characteristics of practice: objectivity, agency, and socio-historicity.

The basic forms of practice: economic, political, military, educational, science and technology, culture, health, sports, ethnicity, religion, justice, social security, social management, social interaction, labor and employment and social security, public service and other activities.

Practice has many meanings, and the classical view is that the subjective sees the objective, including the necessity of the objective to the subjective and the necessity of the subjective to the objective.

In a word, practice includes three basic aspects: production practice (active activity to transform the objective world to meet human production) practice of dealing with social relations (activity aimed at adjusting and reforming social relations between people) scientific practice (purposeful active practice activity to explore the universal laws of the universe).

Man's subjective consciousness arises from man's practical behavior, and at the same time, man's subjective consciousness reacts on objective existence. In Marx, he mainly emphasized the social practice of man, the sociality of practice, and the historical and class nature of the productive forces of man's social consciousness, all of which are material and dialectical.

The subjective and objective existence of human beings are both material, subjective and objective are epistemological, and the difference is the definition of internal and external relations relative to practice. The theory of practice is based on the general understanding of both materialism and dialectics.

Awareness rises to the guiding role of theory. In contemporary times, the criterion of truth emphasizing practice includes the discovery, testing, and realization of truth, which is seen in objectivity.

Man is the objective existence of man, and man himself is material, and it is also an objective substance with the existence of a specific conscious body. The internal contradiction of human beings includes material contradictions: the material contradiction between the ontology of consciousness and the ontology of life, and this contradiction is the basic contradiction inherent in human beings, which is the annihilation of matter.

The internal contradiction of human beings and the external world constitute the contradiction of human development; At the same time, it can be divided into the external social and natural contradictions of the individual subject and the internal and external contradictions of human beings of the social subject. These contradictions are generally human practice! The early Marxists mainly explored the emancipation of the overall contradictions of society and the emancipation of nature.