The woman was killed by the departing security guard elevator, why did the community property and th

The reason why they were suspicious of each other was mainly because the woman's husband didn't pick up his wife home so late, and the security guard didn't do his duty.

The woman's husband was suspicious of each other's property, mainly because the husband felt that the property was not well managed. The property thinks that the husband picked up the ** and did not save people, which is very strange.

The woman was followed by a man at 3 a.m., and after entering the elevator, the man dragged the woman out, and then the man robbed and killed the woman. The husband couldn't find his wife and called the property ** many times, hoping to call up the monitoring to find his wife's location. However, the property security guard shirked several times and insisted that the man find his own wife.

There are a lot of doubts about this matter, and on the surface, it is a property problem, but once you dig deeper, you will find that this husband also has a problem.

1. Why didn't the husband call his wife's friend's ** after the accident, but directly found the property woman to meet a friend, and ended the dinner at three o'clock in the middle of the night. After that, the wife told her husband to wait for her in the garage, and she immediately got off the elevator and went to look for her. However, the man waited for a long time but never saw his wife, and sent her a message and ** but did not reply.

Then the man contacted the property, hoping that the property could call up the surveillance to determine the location of his wife. Under normal circumstances, if the husband cannot contact his wife, he should contact his wife's friend to determine whether she has left the friend's house. But the husband contacted the property directly, as if he knew that something would happen in the elevator.

Second, the property repeatedly shirked and was unwilling to check the surveillance, resulting in the woman being killedAfter the man found the property security guard, the security guard was unwilling to call up the surveillance, but asked the man to find his wife by himself. The man then looked around and still found no trace of his wife, and repeatedly asked the property to show her husband the surveillance. Later, several people found that the woman had been dragged out of the elevator and killed.

Generally speaking, the elevators in the community need to be monitored 24 hours a day. The community security not only does not observe the movement of the elevator, but also repeatedly shirks when someone needs help.

The victim's husband thought that it was a problem with the security guards in the community, and if the security guards had done their duty a little to find the problem earlier, they might have been able to frighten the gangsters, and the victim would not have been killed. The property security guard believes that the woman and her husband often get into trouble and fight is common, so the security guard will ignore it.

3. The suspect is a retired security guard in the community, and it is very likely that he did not kill for money but for vendetta Originally, this case was judged to be murder for money, but judging from various indicationsThere is a good chance that the man was a vendetta.

The suspect has just been released after spending half a year in prison for theft.

The suspect was previously a security guard in this community and was very familiar with the environment in the community.

The man followed the woman into the elevator before killing her. If it's for money, you can start early or just grab something and run, there is no need to move people's lives.

It is common sense that the elevator is monitored. If it was to kill someone, the man had a good chance to do it earlier, and there was no need to wait until he got into the elevator to do it. And the man is very familiar with the community facilities, if he really wants to commit a crime, he should have done something to the surveillance earlier.

According to the security guard, the victim and her husband often have conflicts, and it is not the first time that the property has been reconciled.

When the suspect was arrested, the body was being dug and buried. Judging by all indications, it is likely that the suspect was a vendetta and not a profit. Whether the security guard in the monitoring room has accomplice responsibility needs to be further investigated, and the husband's practice of finding someone to see the monitoring first is also very suspicious.

The specific truth still needs to wait for the ** investigation.

Don't offend people too often.

It is rumored that the husband went directly to the property to see the surveillance, and the normal way should be to find friends and relatives first, indicating that the man knows. Second, ** went with a body bag, well prepared. There are only two possibilities, one is to investigate whether the husband has contact with **, and it does not mean that the man knows that ** will attack his wife, but he deliberately does not pick up his wife home so late, in short, this man is not a good thing.

In any case, monitoring is to serve the owner, and if there is a situation, the owner asks to see why not to see, this security guard must bear legal responsibility, it is necessary.

It is estimated that the quality of this woman is too bad! It's too low! I've done property before.

Because both parties have a certain amount of responsibility for this matter, they will doubt each other.

Me: I think her husband hired the security guard to kill her wife.

If it's a vendetta, then why? Why not others? Doesn't a man's premonition mean that there is a story behind it?

The responsibility must be borne by the person who committed the crime, I think her husband's claim with the community property is really vexatious, why don't I protect my wife.

I think the property should have an unshirkable responsibility, and the property must bear the corresponding responsibility for failing to protect the owner in the community!

I think that the crime is the most responsible, and the poor supervision of the property in the community is also partly responsible.

I think the property needs to be held responsible, because the property is responsible for registering and protecting the personal safety of the residents of the community, but he let those irrelevant people into the community, which will bring personal harm to the owners of the community.

The proprietress of the food stall was robbed and killed in the elevator in the early hours of the morning, and everyone should have expressed sympathy for the husband of the deceased because he lost his lover in this accident. However, this time, netizens did not pay so much attention to the murderer, but felt that the deceased's husband's behavior was very abnormal. It stands to reason that when we hear this kind of grief, our first feeling should be to feel sorry for the deceased, and secondly, to scold this murdererBut in this case, the killer did not "bombard", and the husband of the deceased received a lot of blame, which I think is reasonable for the following reasons:

01, how can you let your wife work alone in the store when you run a food stall together. The husband of the deceased, Mr. Liu, and his wife were out running a food stall, and as a husband, it was wrong for his wife to stay alone in the store until 3 a.m. Although some people defend their husbands, he is also for living, if the family's economic conditions are good enough, who would want to let his wife work so hard outside?

Indeed, because of the family conditions, it is understandable that the wife is working hard, after all, the couple is working hard to run the family and the three children in their hometown. However, it doesn't matter if it's hard, as a husband should be considerate, Mr. Liu didn't do it, he could go to help his wife after work, maybe the tragedy wouldn't have happened.

02. The wife came home at three o'clock in the morning, why couldn't she pick up her as a husband! Secondly, the deceased also communicated with his wife a few minutes before the incident, saying that they would go to have supper together. Now that you're all ready to go for supper together,I'm planning to go out, why don't I go to a food stall to pick up my wife?

As a man, the breadwinner of a family, isn't it natural to pick up his wife who works hard until three in the morning! However, Mr. Liu did not, and after the incident, he just kept blaming the security guard and failed to fulfill his responsibilities. So did he fulfill his responsibilities as a husband?

He may have done it elsewhere, but in this case, he didn't! <>

03. When he found that something was wrong, his husband went to the property as soon as possible, instead of calling the police. When Mr. Liu began to be unable to get through his wife's **, he already had an ominous premonition in his heart, and at three o'clock, he immediately went to the security guard, not the police. Contacted the wife again, there was no result, no one responded.

At this time, as a normal person, I should call the police! The police station is manned 24 hours a day! But he didn't, and went to the security guard again.

Although we should not trouble the police casually, Mr. Liu has realized that his wife may be in danger at this time, and it is perfectly okay to call the police. He could have called the police and asked the police to put pressure on the security guards and bring out the surveillance earlier, and his wife might not have been killed. <>

Afterwards, Mr. Liu learned that his wife had been killed, so he chased after the property, and he believed that his wife's death was inseparable from the indifference of the security guards. It is true that the sluggishness of the security guard missed the time to save his wife, but Mr. Liu's failure to pick up his wife is also a reason! He completely put the blame on the security and the property, so that everyone did not have a good impression of him!

Generally speaking, it should be the first to come back to see if the wife has come home, rather than directly dropping the monitoring, generally speaking, calling the monitoring is the last step to take in the case that the accident has been determined!

Mainly because the husband of the deceased put the blame on the security guard, and he did not accompany his wife.

Because his first reaction was not to care about his wife, but to find the stubble of the security guard at the time, doesn't it seem strange.

When the husband can't contact his wife, he thinks of looking for monitoring instead of going home, and when he puts all the responsibility on the property, his behavior is a bit extreme and suspicious.

If one point can be ignored, the first time is not to go home and directly watch the surveillance, that means that you know what will happen, **carrying a body bag is also abnormal, just a little bit is whether the police will go to collect evidence,**There are no contact conditions with the husband.

This is a scumbag among scumbags, as a husband who doesn't care about his wife at all, what is the wife working so late for every day, for this family, you don't help your wife, but you can take your wife home every night, you can do it! But you didn't do it! It is because of your irresponsibility that your wife will be killed by gangsters, you impose all your faults on the security guards, and let others pay for your mistakes, how can your conscience be eaten by dogs.

The husband can't contact his wife at the first time, so instead of looking for it at home, he asks for monitoring, which is very abnormal!

After seeing this group of brainless people who replied without brains, I feel that the world is quite dark, and her wife has already said that she will be at home soon? I also wait for my wife in the parking lot every day, as soon as I get out of the elevator, I call the police to find someone, I first call the headquarters 110, and then after a while the provincial capital will contact you, in the then urban area, in the area, and then contact the police on duty, in the registration, name, less than 24 hours, can not file a case to investigate and find someone, so check the monitoring is his first and only fastest way! You'll know when you're looking for someone.

Hehe, everyone is a detective here, do you really think that the police are eating idle food, and they are Conan? A guy with a keyboard and no brain!

It's too unusual for the suspect to carry a body bag!

This is the victim guilt theory that is rife on the Internet.

Three watches in the middle of the night, walk to the underground parking lot to meet? Why not prescribe it.

Because after this incident, her husband was doing something that he didn't usually like to do.

Recently, in Quanzhou, Fujian, a 31-year-old proprietress who ran a food stall was killed by a man in the early hours of the morning.

On May 27, the 31-year-old proprietress was Mr. Liu's wife. At 3 o'clock in the morning, Mr. Liu's wife called ** from a friend and told him to go for supper after returning home from work. So Mr. Liu, at 3:04, called ** to his wife and said that he was waiting for her downstairs, and when she put her things back upstairs, he set off for supper.

But when my wife crossed the elevator upstairs, after a while, she still didn't come down. Mr. Liu became anxious, so he sent a message to his wife and called **, but no one replied.

Mr. Liu noticed that something was wrong and immediately went to the security room to request that the surveillance be adjusted immediately. But the security guard actually began to shirk, saying that he couldn't leave and couldn't view the surveillance. said that he could not help Mr. Liu, and asked Mr. Liu to find it himself.

Mr. Liu had no choice but to go to his wife by himself. Mr. Liu was found until 4 a.m. and was not found. I had to turn back to the security room, but at this time, the security guard was still indifferent, saying that he couldn't leave, and asked Mr. Liu to continue to play **.

This time, Mr. Liu finally dialed his wife's **, but ** was connected, but no one spoke. Then shut down.

At this time, the security guard realized that the matter was serious and immediately called another security guard to watch the surveillance with Mr. Liu.

But it's too late. At 3:06 a.m., that is, 2 minutes after Mr. Liu's wife went upstairs, a man in a black vest held a white bag and followed Mr. Liu's wife into the elevator, and then, the man suddenly took out a tool to hijack Mr. Liu's wife, Mr. Liu's wife was so frightened that she squatted down, and then after the elevator on the sixth floor arrived, she was held down and dragged out of the elevator.

He was then killed at the top of the staircase.

Afterwards, ** tried to take away the body of the proprietress and bury the body, drag it to the basement and take it away with an electric car. At 7 o'clock in the morning, ** was taken away when he was about to bury the body.

Mr. Liu said to ** that his wife had valuables on her, such as necklaces and rings and 2,000 yuan in cash, and ** was preliminarily judged to be a robbery!

In this matter, I have to say that the security guard is responsible, and after the incident, Mr. Liu entered the security guard to make a complaint, and has hired a lawyer to defend his rights. Mr. Liu believes that if the security guards had adjusted the surveillance in time, then the tragedy might not have happened.

In addition, I have to insert a sentence here, as a security guard, I don't have such a sense of vigilance, and the man can also kill the boss lady, wrap it, and then drag the body away smoothly. This shows that the security of this property is also too poor.

The security guards of the community did not adjust the monitoring at the first time, missed the best rescue time, and believed that there was a certain relationship between the tragedy and the security guards.

It is also said that the security guard was once imprisoned for half a year for robbery, and then became a community security guard just after his release. I have to feel indignant for this community.

In this regard, the proprietress was killed, and Mr. Liu sued the security guard, what do you think?