What skills did you learn from Mozi s persuasion of the King of Chu and the Gong Losing in Gong Lose

Mozi first set a trap to induce the public to say the phrase "I will not kill anyone". Then, Mozi seized on the sentence of the public loss plate to make a fuss. The sentence "What is the crime of Song" is understated and aggressive, and immediately puts the public loser who helped the Chu State to attack the Song State in a losing position; Then, Mozi used "not wise", "not benevolent", "not loyal", "not strong" and "not knowledgeable", criticizing the behavior of the public losing from all angles, so that the public losing market could not make any justification for his behavior, which was equivalent to cutting off the retreat of the public losing handicap.

The sentence "righteousness does not kill the few, but kills the many" reveals the deceptiveness of the "righteousness" advertised in the public losing market.

The word "service" shows that Mozi's argument is reasonable and powerful, so that there is nothing to say about the public loss. But the invaders will not give up easily, when Mozi further asked him why he didn't stop building the ladder, Gong Loser put the blame on the king of Chu, and then under Mozi's further questioning, he had to agree to lead Mozi to the king of Chu. The article transitions to the following very naturally.

First of all, he forced the public loser class to say "I am righteous and will not kill" because he understood that his behavior was contrary to his own point of view, and pointed out that the public loser was unkind, unwise, disloyal, not strong, and ignorant of class. Killing more people instead of a few is an even greater injustice.

In the end, the siege machinery for the public loss was broken one by one, and second-hand preparations were made.

Mozi first set a trap to induce the public to say "I will not kill anyone"; Then, Mozi used "not wise", "not benevolent", "not loyal", "not strong" and "not knowledgeable" to criticize the behavior of losing the game from various angles.

Adopt roundabout tactics. First of all, he does not directly say the reason, but uses analogy to induce the other party to clarify his point of view, and then refute it.

1 male loser wants to kill and copy.

Mozi, and Mozi knew that he would be killed, and the two knew it, but they didn't say anything.

2. The key is to attack the Song Dynasty and fall into the act of "unwise, unkind, disloyal, not strong, and ignorant".

3 Mozi is good at combining morality and strength, using analogy and contrast, and the persuasion skills of attacking the shield of the son with the spear of the son.

Please adopt hehe.

Adopt a roundabout tactic, do not directly state the reason, and use analogies to induce the other party to clarify their point of view, and then refute it.

Attacking the shield of the son with the spear of the son, the public loss class previously said that he would guard his morality and not kill people, but he helped the Chu State to attack the Song Dynasty, contradicting each other.

There is an answer to this question in the textbook, but if you ask, I'll tell you.

First of all, Mozi asked the public to kill for him, Mozi expected that he would definitely refuse, and this is the case, the public loser said: "I don't kill anyone." Just fell into Mozi's trap.

Mozi conformed to his words and said that it was unwise, unkind, disloyal, not strong, and not intellectual. It is said that the public loss handling is poor, but the public loss is completely convinced.

Let him say it first: Five shares don't kill people, and then use 5 can't be said to make him have no way out.