What are the similarities and differences between Mozi and the King of Chu when persuading the publi

Updated on culture 2024-02-09
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It shows that only by combining morality and strength can the aggressor be forced to rein in his ambitions.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Mozi first set a trap to induce the public to say the phrase "I will not kill anyone". Then, Mozi seized on the sentence of the public loss plate to make a fuss. The sentence "What is the crime of Song" is understated and aggressive, and immediately puts the public loser who helped the Chu State to attack the Song State in a losing position; Then, Mozi used "not wise", "not benevolent", "not loyal", "not strong" and "not knowledgeable", criticizing the behavior of the public losing from all angles, so that the public losing market could not make any justification for his behavior, which was equivalent to cutting off the retreat of the public losing handicap.

    The sentence "righteousness does not kill the few, but kills the many" reveals the deceptiveness of the "righteousness" advertised in the public losing market. The word "service" shows that Mozi's argument is reasonable and powerful, so that there is nothing to say about the public loss. But the invaders will not give up easily, when Mozi further asked him why he didn't stop building the ladder, Gong Loser put the blame on the king of Chu, and then under Mozi's further questioning, he had to agree to lead Mozi to the king of Chu.

    The article transitions to the following very naturally. This paragraph is mainly a dialogue to express reasoning, and only a few key points are concise and expressive. Mozi attaches great importance to the logic of argumentation, and reasoning is not straightforward and sharp, but grasps the psychology of the other party, clever metaphors, and side strikes, in order to lead the other party into the trap set by himself.

    In the text, Mozi uses excuses to draw out the "my righteousness" of the public losing plate, and then uses five "unspeakable" in a row to deeply expose the contradiction of the other party's "righteousness does not kill the few but kills the public" and the hypocrisy of "righteousness".

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Mozi used analogy to let the bus lose plate drill into the trap he had set in advance.

    Male loser"Righteousness", so"Don't kill", in the same way, Jing State should not attack the innocent Song State, otherwise it will not be"Righteousness"

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    First give an example to let the public lose class, and then use the hypocrisy of the public loss class and the contradictions in the words to fight back.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    First of all, he forced the public loser class to say "I am righteous and will not kill" because he understood that his behavior was contrary to his own point of view, and pointed out that the public loser was unkind, unwise, disloyal, not strong, and ignorant of class. Killing more people instead of a few is an even greater injustice.

    In the end, the siege machinery for the public loss was broken one by one, and second-hand preparations were made.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Mozi first set a trap to induce the public to say "I will not kill anyone"; Then, Mozi used "not wise", "not benevolent", "not loyal", "not strong" and "not knowledgeable" to criticize the behavior of losing the game from various angles.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Adopt roundabout tactics. First of all, he does not directly say the reason, but uses analogy to induce the other party to clarify his point of view, and then refute it.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    When Mozi heard that Gong Yipan was going to attack the Song State by building a cloud ladder for the Chu State, he traveled thousands of miles and walked to the capital of Chu for ten days and ten nights to persuade the Gong to lose the plate, showing that Mozi was not afraid of hardships and opposed the "non-offensive" idea of unjust war.

    Mozi's convincing and clever, sharp rhetoric shows that Mozi was an excellent thinker and political activist, with a clever and eloquent eloquence.

    Mozi risked his life to go deep into the enemy country alone to convince Gong to lose the plate and the king of Chu. It shows Mozi's brave spirit of not being afraid of sacrifice in order to stop an unjust war.

    The change in Mozi's nine-distance public loss plate and siege shows that Mozi is brave and strategic.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    [Public loss] is a performance"And love"with"Non-offensive"political advocacy.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Mozi Gong Loses is about the concrete embodiment of Mozi's thought.

    a.Manners. b.Kindheartedness.

    c.Non-offensived.Wisdom.

    Correct answer: BC

Related questions
18 answers2024-02-09

Let's put it this way, let's see what Jordan is doing back to the Bulls. First, being a player: Jordan's skills are understandable and obvious to all. >>>More