Did physicist Albert Einstein really believe in theology in his later years?

This is not true, and it is difficult for Einstein to surpass the achievements of scientific theories to this day, and it is impossible to believe in theology.

Yes, in his later years, he devoted himself to the study of theology, which naturally required faith in order to make a breakthrough.

I really don't know this very well, and I may or may not believe it. All I know is that he believes in Buddhism.

It's not realistic, they are already at the highest point of truth, maybe now technology is not proving things to make them believe in theology.

1. Gravitation is a statement that does not know the cause, it is not a theory, it is an unreasonable elaboration. So it won't be right. 2. The bending of time and space is a big lie.

What is the definition of space-time? I can't tell, what kind of bending are you talking about? 3. Quantum entanglement is completely detached from the principle of information propagation and is ridiculous.

The principle of information propagation: information is transmitted in an energetic way through the vibration of space matter.

It is said that the end of science is theology, after all, there are many scientists who have gone to study theology in their years.

This may have reached a metaphysical point where he can only ask if there is one.

Theology returns to science, and science moves toward superscience. Superscience is powerful, and it is necessary to use the truth of science in order to move towards more esoteric science.

The universe, including the mysterious places of the earth, is unimaginable, so theology is a must.

I don't think anyone can make a definitive conclusion if we don't have definite evidence.

I think it was something that made him discover something, and everything was for a reason.

Albert Einstein said, "I didn't say these things, the Buddhists said them for me."

Why did Einstein begin to study theology in his later years?

Isn't it just entertainment and leisure in your later years, is it worth thinking of Fei Fei?

Albert EinsteinThe main reason for believing in theology in his later years was that the scientific results he had researched could no longer be further explained by natural scienceThat is, the theory of relativity.

In fact, the things expressed have existed in nature for a long time, and Einstein is just a discoverer, but Einstein himself cannot say who the "man" who created the theory of relativity.

Although our science and technology are developing very rapidly, there are still many hidden mysteries in science, and we cannot solve the mystery at present, so we can only find the answer to the mystery in theology. For example, in quantum mechanics.

Next, we can indeed find that there are microscopic things in the huge field of vision, and we have discovered the basic unit of life.

That's the cell.

But despite this, we cannot explain the true origin of human beings, and we can only do nothing about this great mystery. Perhaps only theology can make up for our empty ideas.

In his eyes, he is nothing more than a discoverer, discovering the laws that exist in the universe, and who is the creator who created this law? Perhaps only the "gods" can explain it.

In fact, this is not the case, although we are now developing very rapidly in science, in fact, there are still many mysteries that have not been solved. Some mysteries can't even be explained by science at all. Hundreds of years ago, although these two great men opened up the field of scientific development, but they themselves also have a very big confusion, our current scientists, there are still many people who believe in theology, and these two scientists can be said that there is no one before and after them, there is no one in front of them who can show them the way, they are the leaders of the whole era, so they are more confused, and in the face of many problems may not be explained at all, they have to think that this is something created by God, which is also a kind of spiritual sustenance for themReligious beliefs can indeed explain a lot of things.

I think that religious belief and scientific theory are not contradictory things, religious belief is a kind of baptism of the spirit, and scientific theory is actually a kind of progress for the real society, the two will not hurt each other, nor will they contradict each other, although these two great men in their later years, pinned their spirits on religious beliefs, this is not that he thinks that scientific research is wrong, but they want to release their spirits in this regard in their later years, because their energy is limited in their later years. It may not be possible to create more scientific theories, but they want to turn these scientific theories into theology to see if there are any new developments, which is also a kind of creation.

The main reason is that after the objective physical laws have been studied to a certain extent, it is very difficult to explain the reasons for their occurrence, because they will constantly ask why this is, so they look for spiritual sustenance!

At the end of science is theology, or philosophy.

Theology originates from the exploration of the unknown, and when it reaches a certain level, science can no longer satisfy those great men, because science is repeatable and verifiable, while the exploration of the origin of all things, the birth and death of the universe, science cannot do it, there is no comparison, no experiment, and it cannot be repeated, and science must be built on the basis of actual matter.

**The origin of life is not within the scope of science, such as the question of "chicken or egg".

The ultimate question of mankind is "From the **?" To ** go? Why live? ”

Newton studied theology, and at that time, he was baptized or something since he was a child, which had some influence, and it was too much to say that he believed in theology, and it had something to do with our customs and Taoism and Buddhism, and it could not be said that we were all believers. Albert Einstein was even less theological. So your question itself is not valid.

Newton and Einstein believed that theology was motivated by their own interests and religious beliefs. There are many religiously affiliated scientists who also strive for science. Moreover, the countries and ruling strata of these two people are also mainly religious.

If they didn't believe in theology, it would have seemed unusual at the time, especially in Newton's day.

Mainly because these great scientists later found that many of the scientific theories they knew could not be explained by science and believed in theology.

Don't be misled by some self-leading articles, the theology that Newton Einstein and others believed was very different from what many people usually understood. To put it simply, what scientists mean by theology means that with the deepening of scientific research, it will be found that many laws are very ingenious and perfect, making it difficult for people to believe that they are naturally formed, as if there is a God like a creator in control. And the so-called theology of ordinary people has too much superstitious overtones.

There are similarities between the two, but there are obvious differences.

Newton and Einstein, the greatest physicists, began to believe in higher education in their later years, because no matter how smart and wise he was, but he was also afraid of death, so he began to believe in theology when he was old.

Newton was always a devout believer, so there was no such thing as believing in this for thousands of years. In his later years, he only felt that he had studied physics thoroughly, so he would concentrate on the study of theology;

Throughout his life, Einstein professed to believe in "pantheism", which was completely different from monotheism, so there was no so-called theology that he believed in in his later years.

Perhaps because they have studied too deeply, they feel that there is no way to explore the world, and instead they believe in world theology.

Because these great scientists, in the process of research, gradually discovered that their power was very small, so in the end they often attributed these mysterious powers to theology.

Because I encountered a lot of things that I couldn't solve, I pushed them to God, so that my life would be perfect.

Because the greater the scientists, the more they will discover many mysteries when they are scientific. They will think that God created these things.

Why Newton Einstein was a great physicist and believed in theology for thousands of years, I think it was just that he encountered a lot of difficult mysteries on the road of science, so he finally chose theology.

Generally speaking, the greatest scientists, who in your later years believed in theology, there is a saying that the end of science is theology.

Why did Newton Einstein believe in theology? There is no contradiction between science and theology, and science and technology to be studied and developed are called theology.

Newton because of Einstein, the great physicist, and then this situation appeared, I think this matter should be taken seriously, after all, science is really worth satisfying, believing.

In his later years, his intelligence deteriorated and he forgot about the results of his previous research.

Why did great physicists like Newton and Stan believe in theology in their later years? Maybe people will believe this when they reach a certain age.

Why some of the great figures of Albert Einstein, the physicists who believed in theology in their later years, I think they may think that they were roommates of theological students.

Einstein, a famous physicist, began to study theology in his later years, he believed that the world was created by God, and when Einstein was in the hospital**, he also wrote a "Memoir", the general content of this memoir is: God lives in our universe, God controls everything in the universe, many people may think it is incredible when they see this, why did Einstein believe in God? It may be because there are too many unexplained phenomena in this world, such as the singularity, scientists believe that the universe was born from the singularity**, and the singularity is a place with infinite mass, infinite energy, infinite heat, and infinitely small volume.

Albert EinsteinBut in physics, there should not be infinitely large or infinitely small objects, because the singularity is too mysterious, so scientists can only use the word infinite to describe it, even if the singularity really exists, then how did this singularity come about? But the singularity can't appear out of thin air, and in the early days of the universe, there must have been an initial force that made it happen, but what exactly is this initial force?

At present, scientists do not know, maybe this initial force is what Einstein thought of God, the universe is vast and mysterious, and it is basically impossible to solve the mysteries of the universe with the current technology of human beings.

Mystic Universe.

In other words, the things expressed by the theory of relativity actually existed in nature for a long time, and Einstein was just a discoverer, but Einstein himself could not say who the "man" who created the theory of relativity.

People only get together when they have faith, they all believe that they are human beings, different from animals, and they believe that people will not do animal things. But it can only be believed, because in reality, some people will do inhumane things, things without morality, and things without a bottom line for their own interests.

But human beings still believe in the rules of the human game, whoever commits a crime will not be able to escape, and sooner or later will be judged by justice, because justice will come sooner or later. From ancient times to the present, who has done bad things and escaped the judgment of justice? The reason why many people don't do illegal things is that they have faith, and their faith is their own people, not animals.

The reason why Einstein studied theology in his later years was not that he believed in God, but only in the exploration stage. He found that the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics were in conflict, could not believe that it was true, and he could not explain why, so he studied theology in the hope of finding relief. In fact, Ein's later period was a failure, and his lack of scientific rigor led many people to mistakenly believe that he really believed in the existence of God.

I can understand that Ein's later days are too extreme, but don't be fooled into believing that he also believed in the existence of God. Because science is confined to the earth, theology and Taoism are in the universe. ====The results of the research are nothing more than that.

Albert Einstein wrote a letter dated January 4, 1954. Recipient: Jewish philosopher Eric. gutkind。

The original text is as follows: For me, the existence of the word God is nothing more than the product of human weakness, and the Bible concentrates countless glories, but those ancient legends are very naïve. No amount of cunning explanation will make me change this opinion.

These obscure explanations are all derived from their nature and have nothing to do with the original text. For me, Judaism, like other religions, seems to me to be the embodiment of childlike superstition. And as a Jew--- I am glad to be who I am and deeply identify with the spirit of this people--- I do not feel that the Jewish people are superior to others.

As far as I can see, I do not think that the Jews are superior to other peoples, even though they avoid corruption because of their lack of rights. I don't see any characteristic that would indicate that the Jews were God's "chosen" people. "I find it painful to claim to be a noble person, and in order to protect this nobility, you need to build two walls of arrogance, one external – as a human being and one internal – as a Jew.

As a human being, it is a necessity of cause and effect, and as a Jew, it is a product of the privilege of monotheism. But with all due respect, the limited causality is no longer causation at all, as the great Spinoza has profoundly pointed out. The animism of nature preached by religion has never been abolished in principle by the ruling class.

This kind of wall can only allow us to deceive ourselves, but it cannot allow us to sublimate in morality. And it's counterproductive. Now, I can be very frank about the difference between our rational beliefs.

But it is clear to me that we agree with each other on some essential issues. For example, in evaluating human behavior. In Freud's words, it is only "way" and "reason" that divide us.

So, I think we understand each other very well when we talk about specific things. Friendly thanks and best wishes a Albert Einstein.