is also a usurpation, why was Cao Wei and Han recognized by later generations, but Sima Daiwei was c

Although they are all usurpers, the ways between them are not the same at all, and Cao Cao's usurpation at that time can be said to be a battle without gunpowder and without bloodshed。Moreover, Cao Cao slowly accumulated his strength, eroding the Han Dynasty at that time little by little, and it took many years to truly achieve his goal and make the people accept his rule. But the Sima family is simply exterminated, so that the people can't accept his rule, so they have some malicious comments on him.

In ancient times, the change of dynasties inevitably required some violent acts to force some rulers to give up their thrones to more capable people to rule. Although there is a particularly good term for this called the Zen concession system, all that is not seen under the Zen concession system is calm. It's just some cruel methods and despicable acts, and Cao Cao's choice is to let the ruler take the initiative to abdicate and make way for Xian.

And it was also because the ability of the rulers of the Han Dynasty at that time was really not enough, so when Cao Cao condensed the north and developed it strong, he asked him to give up the throne, he had no choice but to obey his request. Like Cao Cao, it is a way to make the other party automatically **, which can be regarded as a normal change of dynasty.

And the Sima family was simply killing a lot, killing a lot of people at that time, and they had no favor for the Cao clan, in order to be afraid of the spring breeze blowing and giving birth again. But because the method was too tough and cruel, it was difficult for the common people to accept his rule, so the power of the Sima family was overthrown not long after.

The reason why the Sima family has been criticized is mainly because the Sima family's methods are too cruel, almost all of the Cao family are killed, and his actions replace the Cao family, and the process is too bloody.

Cao Cao and others have evolved over a long period of time, so the resistance of the people at that time was already very low, and the Sima family directly usurped power and used extremely cruel methods, so they were criticized.

Cao Wei Daihan is bloodless violence, and there is a set of plausible rhetoric. Sima Daiwei is not only bloody and violent, but also has no reason to explain.

The Sima family's methods were too ruthless, and almost all of the Cao family were killed, which was something that Cao Wei had never done to the Han family.

Because the Han Dynasty already existed in name only, and the emperor was just an ornament, Cao Pi's usurpation of the Han Dynasty was a matter of course in everyone's eyes.

Mainly because Sima usurped the throne by very despicable means, while Cao Pi's words of usurping Han were righteous and bright, and he also relied on himself.

First of all, it is because Sima usurped the throne in a very despicable way, while Cao Pi's words of usurping Han are simple and bright, and he also relies on himself.

I think this is because Cao Cao is still good to Emperor Xian of the Han Dynasty, so many people acquiesce to Cao Pi's usurpation of the Han Dynasty.

Both seem to be usurpers, but in fact they are very different in nature, as the so-called no comparison is no harm, although Cao Pi's usurpation of Han is also despised, but the latecomer Sima Yan's usurpation of Wei is even more disgraceful, and it feels very forcible and robbed, it is simply a thief, so in comparison, the former is much better.

Because Cao Pi usurped the Han Dynasty because the Han Dynasty was exhausted, and the Sima family usurped the throne because he wanted power, and Cao Cao knew the grace of Sima Yi, and the usurpation of the Sima family was revenge.

There is no essential difference, but everyone thinks that Sima Zhao's heart is well known to passers-by, and this is a bit too despicable and insidious, and the emperor of the late Han Dynasty is also a little incompetent.

In people's eyes, although Cao Pi's usurpation of Han is essentially the same as Sima usurping Wei, you must know that the situation of the Cao family was fought by Cao Cao with great difficulty, so their usurpation can be said to be a matter of course, and people will naturally acquiesce to this fact. But the usurpation of the Sima family was to pick the fruits of the Cao family's victory, and it would naturally be looked down upon.

It is because Cao Pi safeguarded the interests of the country and saved the people, but Sima let the country fall into the abyss.

I think Cao Cao is a usurper of Han, and the Sima family is a usurper of Wei, because Cao Cao is a usurper of the Han Dynasty, and the Sima family is indeed a usurper of the Wei state.

Yes, Cao Cao initially blackmailed the Son of Heaven to order the princes, and later became the emperor directly. The Sima family rebelled and became the royal family of Wei.

In the eyes of some historians who mainly study mainstream history, Cao Cao is a usurper of the Han Dynasty, and the Sima family is a usurper of Wei, and these views are more or less reflected in the textbooks.

Because Sima Yi's usurpation of power was not fought by himself, but by the empty glove white wolf, who was directly snatched from the Cao family by stratagem.

Cao Wei's dynasty was recognized by later generations because Cao Wei's world was called by the Cao family. However, Sima stole Cao Wei's rule, so he was not approved.

Because Cao Wei governed the country very well after the Han Dynasty, and the Jin Dynasty established by the Sima family was indeed the darkest dynasty in history, the evaluation of later generations was the opposite, and the evaluation of later generations was based on the life of the people, not according to whether they usurped the throne.