Which is better, Shadowrun GT240 Black Edition X5 or ZOTAC GT240 512D5 Destroyer???

Ӣ GT240 Black Edition x5 V20

Specifications Graphics core.

Graphics chip GeForce GT240

Chip manufacturer NVIDIA

Manufacturing process 40 nm.

Core codename GT215

Graphics card clock: Core clock: 550MHz

Video memory frequency 1700MHz

Shader frequency 1400MHz

Memory Specifications Memory type GDDR5

Video memory capacity (MB) 1024

The memory bit width is 128 bits

Video memory description Uses GDDR5 video memory.

Video memory speed. The highest resolution is 2560*1600

Graphics card heat dissipation Heat dissipation method Cooling fan.

Graphics card interface, bus interface, PCI Express 16x output, input interface: HDMI

Display interface: 24-pin DVI-I interface, 15-pin Type D (VGA) interface, physical characteristics, 3D API, directx

SP unit 96 pcs.

ZOTAC GT240-512D5 Destroyer.

Graphics core, graphics chip, Geforce GT240, chip manufacturer, NVIDIA

Manufacturing process 40 nm.

Core codename GT215

Graphics card clock: Core clock: 650MHz

Memory frequency 4000MHz

Memory Specifications Memory type GDDR5

Video memory capacity (MB) 512

The memory bit width is 128 bits

Video memory description Uses GDDR5 video memory.

Video memory speed. The highest resolution is 2560*1600

Graphics card heat dissipation Heat dissipation method Cooling fan.

Graphics card interface Bus interface PCI Express 16X output Input interface Displayport HDMI display interface 24-pin DVI-I interface 15-pin Type D (VGA) interface physical characteristics 3D API DirectX

SP unit 96 pcs.

In addition to the video memory and video memory frequency, the others are basically the same,Because it's the same GT240,It's just a different manufacturer, so the specifications are a little different,The price of the former is slightly higher and the latter is a little higher,But I personally think the former should be stronger,Because the video memory is 1G,If both sides are overclocked to the highest,In fact, the performance is not equal.。。。 It's just that if you don't overclock, I still think the former is stronger...

Based on the data given by the big brother above, of course, it is Zotac NB, the core and the existing frequency are not of the same level The existing high has eggs, and the existing frequency can't keep up Isn't it equivalent to a 30-wide horse passing by 100 measuring cars 50 meters wide passing by 50 measuring cars The latter is faster.

In terms of performance, it is not as good as HD4830, and the price is about the same!

To be cost-effective.

The GT240 is about the combination of sufficient energy saving and certain performance.

It's okay for the GT240 D5 to outperform the G92 9600GSO, with performance between the 9600GT and 9800GT.

The performance of the high-frequency GT240 is still good, after all, the standby belt is 10 watts, there is no external power supply, the full load power can be imagined, and the heating is also low, so the life is long.

The Destroyer is the default GT240 with the highest frequency on the market, but to be honest, it is not recommended.

Rationale:1The fan is 2-pin, the speed cannot be adjusted, and the noise is on the high side. (This question can be seen on the official forum of ZOTAC, and there is a large number of complaints).

2.**Expensive, compared to other GT240, the cost performance is too low. **Shadow GT240 Lieutenant General 510 yuan can be won, although the frequency is lower than the destroyer, but the default frequency is set too conservatively, no need to pick, each can be overclocked to high frequency, stable use.

At present, it is necessary to choose a new generation of graphics cards with energy saving and low heat. To choose a graphics card from the previous belt for a good price.

If you want to perform on the 599, you can choose 4830 or 4750.

Performance.

4830 is greater than gt240 > 9600gso.

** On GT240 > 4830 > 9600GSO sound.

9600GSO > 4830 > GT240

In terms of power consumption, 4830 is greater than 9600 GSO and greater than GT240, and cost performance.

4830 is greater than 9600 GSO is greater than GT240

Onda 9600GSO 420 yuan. Not 499.

Dilan Hengjin 4830 550 yuan.

Measure it yourself!

It's true that the performance is not as good as the 4830. Slightly better than 9600gso. However, the N card supports physical effects and is well compatible.

Shadow GT240 Black Edition X5 599

Sapphire HD4830 512M Overseas Version 599 Dilan Hengjin HD4830 Thunder Drill 512MB 599

Who told you that the GT240 Destroyer easily defeated the 9600GSO 384M, but it is really inferior to the HD4830

800 yuan is definitely expensive, I only bought 720 yuan....The model number is yours, too.

The performance of the HD5750 is significantly stronger than that of the GT240 or even the 9800GT, so you don't need to think about it at all, just choose the HD5750.

The ZOTAC GT240-512D5 Destroyer graphics card uses the GT215 core with a frequency of 650MHz, which is higher than the public version. It has 96 built-in stream processors, 32 texture units, and 8 raster units. In terms of video memory specifications, it uses 512MB 128bit GDDR5 video memory particles, and the working frequency reaches 4000MHz, which is much higher than the 3600MHz of the public GT240.

ZOTAC GTS250-512D3 F1 graphics card uses the old and strong G92 core, the working frequency is 738MHz, the specifications are 128 stream processors and 64 texture units, and the number of raster units reaches 16. Its core performance is far superior to that of the GT240. This GTS250 uses 512MB 256bit GDDR3 video memory chips, the operating frequency is 2200MHz, and it provides a video memory bandwidth of 70GB s, which is a bit higher than the GT240 D5 version.

It's worth noting that the GTS250 has a stream processor frequency of up to 1825MHz, which is much higher than the 1500MHz of the GT240 D5.

So the performance gap between the two is obvious, GTS250 is very stable in the 800 900 level market, while GT240 D5 is currently mainly controlling the 600 yuan level market.

In terms of performance, GTS250 is good, but GTS250 consumes more power and heat than GT240, if it is a 300W power supply, it is better to use GTS240, if it is a 350W + power supply, you can use GTS250

GTS250 is at least one and a half grades higher than GT240, GT240 is at best a little better than 9600GT, 9800GT is much better than GT240, 9800GT upgraded 9800GTX and then 9800GTX+. The GTS250 is the ultimate version of the 9800GTX+.

250 is better than 240, and that shouldn't be a big deal.