Which good guy gives a new car data! Please help me I would like to know the annual inspection of th

Straight-line non-moving head acceleration 284

Cornering speed: 138 or so, the same cornering speed as the Ranger SR.

Cornering agility: The Defender SR is not very flexible.

Grip, defender SR is really not good, but like monster SR, it's not very low.

Very well balanced. (The above data is L1 channel) I see you ask like this, it seems that there is a plan to buy it. Here's a suggestion for you.

Due to the excellent performance of props, the flexibility is mid to the top, the short lane is medium, and the attributes are upstream, which is indeed a good prop car.

In terms of racing, the data is very strong, but the potential is too small, and it is destined not to shine.

Linked to the gift package of 520 points, plus the unlimited challenge special pet ** God Stone Statue, it is also cheap.

The data and attributes of the previous login car defender SR should be similar, so let's wait for the review** to come out. But personally, I don't think if it's a racing player, I don't have to think about it.,Defenders won't have too sharp data in the current SR era.,Not to mention sharp edges and x9 or something.,Defenders are hard to compete with even the previous justice.,But the props of the shield are still good.,If the conditions are good, the prop players can try.。

Starting from the new car, it will be reviewed once every two years, for a total of six years, that is, three times a year'After six years, it will start to be reviewed once a year, for example, if the new car is on the household in March 2010, then it will be reviewed annually in March 2013, and then in March 2015 or the first 90 days, even if it is a second-hand car you buy, such as if you go to the household in July, it will also be reviewed in March

The first 6 years of use of a small car from the date of the first license plate are once every 2 years, the annual inspection is carried out every year after 6 years of use, and the annual inspection is carried out every six months after 15 years of use.

Comparison of recent model data:

ft and monsters. Thunder. Golden Pig. Phoenix Data:

ft--- monster -- thunder -- golden pig -- phoenix.

Shake head grip: r 197 --198 --

l3 211 --212 --212 --212 --212

l2 218 --219 --219 --219 --219

Double acceleration straight line speed.

r 238 --241 --

l3 257 --259 --258 --259 --259

l2 266 --268 --267 --268 --267

Curve deceleration average:

115km/h --120m/h --135m/h --115m/h

Personal N20 time.

ft - Monsters.

2.19 seconds --3.00 seconds

Blue N20 time.

ft - Monsters.

3.21 seconds --4.14 seconds

The above is a rough comparison, I didn't find it all, sorry! `

It's too new, it's not out yet, wait.

[yidetion] is absolutely correct, just take this example of what he said, the example is a bit long, but easy to understand:

Let's say there's a class circle

class circle

elsepublic:

The public designator indicates that the data is not encapsulated, and users of any class can directly access the data member M radius

unsingned double m_radius;Radius.

Suppose a person uses this class circle, and it has the following ** in its main function:

int main()

Explanation: Because data members are not encapsulated, all objects that can directly use the class are used with ''operator accesses its members, and then because there are no restrictions, I can make the radius negative, i.e. -1; It is clear that this is wrong.

In fact, the circle provides a correct way to use it, which is to have a setradius member function, which can ensure that M radius changes it without being negative.

Suppose one day the creator of the circle class suddenly thinks that the name M Radius is too earthy and wants to change it to M 2B.

The question is, what happens to users who use this class? For example:

The [compilation error] in the main function will say that there is no data member named "M radius" in the circle class. If the user uses [ in tens of thousands of places, it will be a big trouble, and the user will have to change it one by one to [.

Summary: The above phenomena are common problems caused by the lack of encapsulation of data members, and the solution to the problem is to completely solve the problem - "encapsulation", change the radius access identifier to private:

class circle

elseprivate: "Modified Section.

unsingned doublem_radius;Radius.

In this way, the user of the class cannot directly put the data members of the class, i.e. the above [is wrong, even if the M radius has not been renamed. To change the value of the radius, the user only needs to call the function of changing the radius, and this function is safe (because it guarantees that the radius will only be changed if the value given by the user is greater than 0). If the creator of the class wants to change the name of M radius, all you need to do is change the name inside this setradius, and we users don't care what the creator changes the radius name to.

Because we don't (and can't) use the name M radius directly, i.e. there is no (and can't have) anything like that. <—That's the benefit of encapsulation.

The correct and safe thing for all users to do is to modify the radius via the setradius member function

int main()

1.The abstraction of the class is in a practical sense, for example, I don't know you, I won't let you touch my phone, right? Now you just want to play with my phone, what do you say I should do?

Beat you up. It's the same in the program. If it's an object, then we should encapsulate the data as a private member unless there is a special reason to do so.

Benefits, simple maintenance. Why it's easy to maintain. Because we're operating.

RADIUS will always use set radius, etc. If you tell me one day, make a judgment before setting it up. Okay, let's judge first in set radius().

And the external ** does not need to be changed! Do you understand? If that's not the case, you'll need to prepend each =-5 with an if( right?).

2.If the class is already in use and is not reserved for extensions, then you must re-modify the class. I don't know what to do.

You've changed a class, and all references to that class have to be checked, right? If the circle class is exported in a dll, the client must be changed as well. All calls need to be checked manually, and that's it.

1. If you don't encapsulate, your data can be modified by others at will, and you don't know how he changed it or what it looks like. And when you want to modify the functions of the class, you also need to modify the client programs that use those functions, so it is difficult to maintain.

2. Because the program using the circle class may modify the radius data of the circle class, and this modification may make the radius become a negative value; So you want to keep the radius non-negative, and you need to modify not only the circle class, but also the program that uses it.

If you encapsulate the radius data of the circle, that is, the client program can only modify the radius data through the interface functions provided by the class, then when you want to implement the function of keeping the radius non-negative, you only need to limit the interface program provided by the class to keep the radius non-negative, and you don't need to modify the client program.

Isn't this book too official to eat and support? I don't know if I understand it correctly, but I can share my understanding with you.

I haven't heard of data fields in C++ until now. Looking at the above description, I feel that it should be talking about the access rights of members in the class. That's the public keyword we use. If that's the idea, then read on, if not, then don't look at it.

Question 1: The members of the public attribute can be directly accessed and modified. Let's say I'm going to make a change to the current radius now. For example, all the places where the radius class member was used should be *50.

Then you need to find out all the places where the radius member of the circle class is used, and then change it manually. Of course, you can also search for substitutions, but what if there is a radius in the circle2 class that also has a radius in it? This will cause an error.

So what he means is that class members are better not to access and use directly. Instead, they are encapsulated into class functions that can be retrieved or modified through the functions. This way, the next time you encounter something you want to change, you can modify the function directly, instead of looking it up and then modifying it.

Problem 2: RADIUS remains non-negative. Then what I need to do is probably add the unsigned modifier to the radius. This requires modifying the header file (which is the implementation and declaration of the radius variable) and then recompiling it to the required file (exe, dll, etc.).

In order to use the modified functions in the new version of the executor.

I don't know if it's right though. But I feel that the original description of question 2 is very ridiculous, is there any way to use the new version of the method without recompiling ** after modifying **?

Is it not the same file I use a wireless router in the hall, a front key letter is a smart wheel is a network cable connection (xp) a wireless connection (win7) generally between 3-5m.