Harry Potter ended up breaking the world s strongest wand, what do you think?

In the original book, Ha used the Elder Wand to repair his holly wand, indicating that he would return the wand to Deng Xiao's tomb, and then if he himself died, the conflict between the Elder Wand and it would truly disappear. This detail shows that Harry is really starting to become a great man, respecting the deceased, emotionally disliking the old and forgetting the new, and more importantly, he is not carried away when he gets honored, and at the same time he is full of responsibility and self-confidence in society, he is no longer the irascible adolescent boy in Harry 5, he knows that he has to bear the responsibility of guarding the old wand for the rest of his life, but he is willing to take it instead of breaking it; However, in the movie, Harry breaks off the Elder Wand and throws it down the valley, showing that he is still an impulsive secondary 2 boy who has not grown up.

The Elderberry Wand participated in the Battle of Gedun 1945 and the Battle of Hogwarts, defeating many famous wizards throughout history. This national treasure-level artifact was actually broken, and Harry was guilty of the serious crime of destroying historical relics!

He threw it down, not impulsively, but because he didn't want unnecessary disputes because of the powerful power of the Elder Wand, think about the souls under its wand, think about how many people Voldemort killed for it, think about how many people Grindelwald killed with it, if there was a powerful dark wizard in the later stage, or a magician with a little ambition, as the so-called guilty man, Harry's family was their primary target of cruelty, and the struggle for power and power would continue. All Harry can do is put an end to this kind of controversy and hope, and I think it's good.

Harry defeated Lord Voldemort, but as the main character, he was a kind man...He saved the world by defeating Lord Voldemort. It took countless efforts, time, and even his entire youth to defeat Voldemort, and he was tired. And in order to prevent others from following in Voldemort's footsteps, breaking his wand is not only for the world, but also for himself.

This is one of the three Deathly Hallows, it not only brings convenience to people, but also brings more trouble, Ha used it to do the last thing, to connect his phoenix tail feather wand, and then eliminate the burden of this world, so that everyone can live a good life. I can't tell if this is a kind of selfishness of crossing the river and tearing down the bridge, or justice that does not value one's own interests.

This elderberry wand was originally used by the Grim Reaper to kill mages, and whoever took it would not escape the doom (the elder brother was killed by other wizards because of the wand).

As far as the wand itself is concerned, since it is the strongest wand, there must be people with bad intentions who want to get it. In this way, the wand will bring strife. I think Harry Potter ended up destroying the wand out of peace.

The most powerful wand in the world, the super wand created by the "Grim Reaper" himself, was actually broken by such a Muggle method. This unrealistic setting is simply a slap in the face of the god of death. That Thestrals' tail hair in the wand is crying storm!

Harry snaps the elderberry, seemingly preventing a bloody scramble over the elder. But in reality, it doesn't matter if elderberry is there or not, as long as someone is there, the struggle will go on forever. So Harry's premise of breaking the elderberry was purely redundant.

Although the Elder Wand was broken, its power did not disappear, and the old man who sold the wand at the time in the movie explained that the power of the Elder Wand had been transferred to Harry's captured wand, so Voldemort got the Elder Wand's body, but he couldn't exert his power. Harry used the golden cicada to shed its shell, making the world mistakenly believe that the Elder Wand was broken, and there was no stronger wand ever left.

In fact, Harry in the original book finally put the Elder Wand back in the headmaster's marble tomb, and I personally prefer this setting, so that its power really dies and the master is no longer defeated. The handling in the movie is considered inappropriate, because the Elder Wand is a powerful medium that can repair the wand, and the magic is quite strong, so it is only broken in the Muggle method? No, no, no, it's unmagical.

So I don't like the changes to the Deathly Hallows movie:1Grindelwald told Voldemort the whereabouts of the Elder Wand.

2.Harry broke the Elder Wand. This is a very classic GDAD relationship testimony in HP!

And is there any point in the Elder Wand being broken? Finally, the dialogue between Harry and Dumbledore about the Elder Wand in the original book is more valuable! How nice it would be to put it back in Dumbledore's grave like in the original book!

The ending of the book is that Harry puts the Elder Wand back, and if he dies normally, there will be no Elder Wand, and the words in the movie feel too eager to show that Harry is not so power-seeking? Or is it a sign that the finale is over?

The Deathly Hallows is a magical artifact, and if it should be destroyed, it should be as big as the one burned in the volcano of Doom in The Lord of the Rings. indirectly proves that HP Movies had to cut corners in the plot arrangement for some reason.

The Elder Wand is. Isn't it paradoxical that it will be set up to be loyal to the wizard who defeated the current master, but that those who get him are invincible. The first owner was someone who cut his throat and stole the Elder Wand, and Grindelwald was defeated despite being on par with Dumbledore (can only be said to be a water release for love?). , and the old wand will be loyal to the other party when he eats a disarming spell, isn't this digging the grave of the current master.

In the original book, the Elder Wand was put back in its place.

The movie became a direct break and threw it away.

I think I think I think about everything too much, really, for no other reason, it's purely the director's brain.

Harry's wand was broken by Hermione, it can't be repaired without the Elder Wand, you let Harry Potter break the Elder Wand and throw it away, what do you let Harry use in the future, Director, you look into my eyes and speak.

It was a redemption for Harry himself, and an explanation for the end of the matter. But I seem to remember that at the end of the film, the Elder Wand was restored on its own, and maybe that's what makes it so powerful.

I remember that there is a sentence in Harry Potter that "the bloody trail of the Elder Wand is splashed all over the history of magic", because of the great power, many people like Voldemort are eager to find the Elder Wand and get the world, so as to cause some damage to the world......

The original book was not broken and was put back in the tomb of the old Headmaster Dumbledore.

Anyone with an Elder Wand is invincible, and the owner of the Elder Wand will lose its power if it dies, in other words, every owner of the Elder Wand has been defeated, so this thing is useless, it will only cause strife, it is better to let it disappear.

Harry couldn't fully guarantee that he wouldn't be defeated in the future, and once the defeated wand was taken away, they would face another war, how many people died in the last war? Hogwarts is destroyed, are they going to do it again? So, it's better to break it.

This problem is just as problematic as the feathering of Voldemort at the end, in which Voldemort died like a mortal in the original book, proving that magic could not make him a person beyond mortals, and that feathering him would not be an acknowledgment that his path would make people like him distinguishable from mortals.

Don't worry about the elderberry in Dumbledore's tomb will cause trouble to Dumbledore's peace, imagine that even if there is no wand in the tomb, Lauder will not dig the grave? Dumbledore's personal fame was far more intimidating than any burial object, and what was supposed to come would eventually come.

Compared with the ending of the movie, I want to know if it is appropriate to put the old devil back in the tomb in the original book. The master of the old devil is still Harry, which means that Harry cannot be lifted once in the rest of his life**. Isn't this a little too difficult, Harry is too famous, and the power of the old devil is also known to be the first, so it's easy to be targeted.

In the original book, Harry put it back in Deng Xiao's tomb, which means that as long as Harry himself dies a natural death, the Elder Wand will have no real owner in the future. In the book, he has become a responsible person. And in the movie, Harry broke his wand, still as impulsive as before.

Overall, the wizard Harry returned his wand to Dumbledore's grave, and Muggle Daniel broke the Elder Wand.

As Hermione said, the wand was worth more than the trouble he carried, and Harlem finished the wand and he grew. Looking at what is written in the movie, he broke his wand, violating the original book.

You said that this is the plot of the movie, and this kind of brainless tampering with the original book has no value for discussion. This is like, in the original book of the Water Margin, it is obvious that Lu Zhishen captured Fang La, and the TV series prefers to be smart and changed to Wu Song to capture Fang La, do you still have to ask what is the meaning of this change?

Reha still used his wand and put the Elder Wand in Dumbledore's tomb, which is the plot to discuss.

Strife never ends with the breaking of the Elder Wand, so there is no point in breaking the Elder Wand.

Harry Potter is acting correctly, and if the wand is obtained by the bad guys, it will endanger others.

Many of the adaptations by David Yates are problematic, such as Bella killing Sirius without using the Death Curse, Grindelwald not telling Tom the whereabouts of the Elder Wand, and Harry breaking the Elder Wand, these adaptations make people feel unclear.

Yes.

In the final Wizarding Wars, there is a very important scene of Draco that has been deleted. He threw his wand to Harry in front of the Dark Lord and the many Death Eaters. Harry took his wand and killed Voldemort in the end.

Draco was also able to make such a move, and he was also full of courage, after all, once Voldemort finally triumphed, he must be the first to be settled by the Queen.

But it is said that later Rowling.

Feeling that this did not fit Draco's villain image, he asked to delete it. It seems that in Rowling's mind, she just identifies Draco as a villain.

Draco Malfoy(Draco Malfoy), whose full name is DracoLucius Malfoy(Draco Lucius Malfoy), a pure-blood wizard, Lucius Malfoy and Narcissa Malfoy (néeBlakeThe only begotten son. As a Death Eater child, Draco grew up convinced of the importance of bloodline.

Draco Malfoy (Draco Malfoy) is the famous British female writer Rowling's famous magical ** "Harry Potter".

A character in the series, both good and evil, Slytherin House.

The student is a pale, pointed-chin, with light blonde hair and gray eyes, from a wealthy pure-blooded family, who is a sworn enemy of the protagonist Harry Potter (who became friends in Harry Potter and the Cursed Child). In the Harry Potter film adaptation of the film series, he is played by Tom Felton.

The top 10 strongest wands in Harry Potter are as follows:

1. Harry Potter: Eleven inches (about 28 cm), holly wood, phoenix feathers, soft and flexible.

2. Voldemort: Thirteen and a half inches, yew wood, phoenix feathers.

3. Severus Snape: Thirteen and one-half inches long, birch, with an unknown core (most likely a phoenix feather).

4. Draco Malfoy: Just ten inches, hawthorn wood, unicorn hair.

5. Rubeus Hagrid: Sixteen inches, oak, cane core unknown.

6. Hermione Granger: Fourteen inches, it is grapevine wood, and the core of the staff is the tendon cord of the dragon's heart.

7. Ron Weasley (old): Charlie's old wand that is a little torn, with unicorn hair peeking out from the ends.

8. Ron Weasley (new): Fourteen inches, willow wood, unicorn fur.

9. Neville Longbottom: Cherry wood, unicorn hair, size unknown.

10. Cedric Diggory: Twelve and a quarter inches, skullwood, male unicorn hair, very elastic.

Other wands of magic awakening

Victor Krum: Ten and a quarter inches, hornbeam, dragon's heartstring, harder, thicker than most wands.

Remus Lupin: Ten and a quarter of an inch, cypress, unicorn hair.

Cho Zhang: Made of sandalwood, about nine inches, with an unknown core.

Hibiscus: Nine and a half inches, yellow sandalwood, with a core of the hair of a beautiful baby, unbendable.

James Potter: Eleven inches, mahogany, cane core unknown.

Lily Potter: Ten and a quarter inches, willow, with a core of the dragon's heart tendon cord.

Bellatrix Lestrange: Walnut and Dragon's Nerves, Twelve and Three-Quarters Inches.