Recruitment interview junior high school English 15 minute trial lecture, how to grasp the important

Updated on educate 2024-02-28
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Personally, I think that whether a person's English is good or not was decided from junior high school in my time (I have just graduated from undergraduate now), and now it may be elementary school, but it is still applicable.

    At this stage, you need to arouse students' interest in English and make them interested in the correct way to learn English.

    Personally, I think that grammar is modified, and you can learn it very well if you don't know grammar, and the most important thing is the sense of language, and this needs to be cultivated early.

    So you can show in your trial that you can play a role in enlightening students, you can get students to interest in English, you can show them to read along, or start with words, everything can be done in a way that you understand and adapt to to do your best.

    I wish you to be a great teacher, not just a teacher who takes students to the exams. And once you can arouse students' interest in English and let them understand English correctly, their English scores will naturally be good.

    I recommend you a movie here, Three Fools make trouble in Bollywood, the protagonist Rancho also became a teacher in the end, and I personally think it's quite suitable for you to watch.

    It may be a bit off-topic, but I can't help but see your question. I don't expect you to choose me, but I hope my words will affect you, thank you!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    If the assessment is to grasp the knowledge points, then you can let the students read the text, and then while they are reading, you can insert the knowledge points reflected in the text at the same time, and then summarize at the end;

    If the assessment is quality education, then it is necessary to set up small problems that are close to life and invite as many students as possible.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Teaching and recruitment interviews, requiring a trial lecture of 15 minutes, how many minutes is appropriate?

    Hello dear, I'm glad to have your question I am a co-tutor who asks a question, please wait patiently for x minutes, I am sorting it out, and I will answer it for you immediately, and please don't end the consultation. According to your question, we will find the following answers for your reference within 10 minutes. The trial lecture lasted 15 minutes and the short lecture lasted 7 minutes.

    Although it was said that it was 7 minutes, in fact, the interview teacher had already given the score when you spoke for 4-5 minutes, so I got my report card as soon as I left the examination room. So I am deeply aware of how to get the judges to give you a high score in 4-5 minutes, and not a single second of this time can be wasted. I hope I can help you, dear, and I wish you a happy life!

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The teacher will try to explain how to prepare for 15 minutes as follows:

    Let's start by thinking about the following three questions:

    1.What are the criteria for standing out from the crowd?

    2.What are the precautions for 15 minutes on stage?

    3.How to prepare offstage?

    Candidates who carefully read the textbook before the exam will know what the focus of the text is after drawing the text. The 15-minute trial lecture time is not to finish the text, but to draw two or three points to talk about it, and to explain these two or three points completely, and the teaching process is complete.

    Therefore, in terms of hard power, the gap between excellent candidates will not be too big, and soft power is the foundation of the distance. In the final competition, the difference in the score of whether or not you can pass the interview is often a few points or even a few tenths of a point.

    The judges are all living people, not machines, and they will not be strictly considered to score one by one.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The first is to get a trial lecture topic by drawing lots, and then write a trial lecture plan according to the topic, then try to teach a lesson according to the lesson plan (it can be shortened if the lecture is good), and finally ask a few questions related to the lecture after the trial lecture is completed. This is a rough step.

    To prepare as per this step, it is recommended:

    1. Be familiar with the writing and format of the lesson plan, so as not to write the lesson plan differently.

    2. Be familiar with the current primary school English textbooks, especially the textbooks for the upper grades, so as not to break out in a cold sweat after drawing the questions.

    The trial lecture is not required to be in English, and it is not realistic for primary school students in the whole country. You can bring textbooks, if you don't let them read it, just hand it in.

Related questions
11 answers2024-02-28

In the process of job hunting, there are many cases of elite professionals being rejected by companies because they do not have a good reason to leave. How about this problem?

6 answers2024-02-28

What should I pay attention to when recruiting and interviewing for teaching qualifications? Don't commit these taboos.

7 answers2024-02-28

Position and method of expressing shortcomings: If a person is not a sage, who can be without fault? However, as an oral exam, the recruiter is more concerned about your strengths, and of course, as a job seeker, no one would think of finding the ideal career position by being honest about their shortcomings. >>>More

3 answers2024-02-28

Depending on the unit you are interviewing with, generally those who do sales or agencies require formal wear, that is, suits and suits, and some departments such as telecommunications, mobile and other companies can be free, but the colors are generally no more than 3, and it is best to use cold colors.

6 answers2024-02-28

First, if you fail to repeat the interview, find your own problems first. The most important thing is to be confident, firm and decisive, and never be ambiguous. >>>More