-
As the old saying goes:"It is the fault of the adopted son not to teach the father, and the adopted daughter is not the fault of the virtuous mother. "
As a parent, the first responsibility is to raise and educate your children well. It is the wish of every parent to hope that their son will become a dragon and their daughter will become a phoenix. Therefore, for the healthy growth of the children, the parents worked hard and were willing to be Confucian cattle.
In order for the children to have a good learning environment, parents are even more frugal, save funds, spare no effort, respectable!
However, when the parents are old and need to take care of them, many children have conflicts with their parents because of the distribution of responsibilities, and the analysis is mostly caused by the unfair inheritance of the poor inheritance of the parents. Some even turn against their parents, don't interact with each other, and even preach something"Life is not raised, death is not buried"In order to prove his awesomeness and shrewdness.
When asked why, they seemed to be shocked: Who made you unfairly distribute your parents' property? Who made you a parent not put a bowl of water flat in the first place?
At first glance, I think what these children say is reasonable, and this is it"Plant melons and get melons, plant beans and get beans"Ah, who made you unfair to be a parent first? Find someone to comment, people also blame parents for their negligence in educating their children, said"The son is not filial, and the father is at fault".
Sad? It's all wrong to be a parent!
Is parental education omnipotent? Parents are the first teachers of their children, yes, but parents can't take care of everything for their children, right? When the child is older, he wants to go to school, so he gets an education in school.
The children have entered the society, and he has been nurtured by the society. It's impossible for parents to hold them tightly in the palm of their hands! They are all thoughtful people, they are also civilized people, they are also young parents with children, and they also know the good intentions of being parents.
Can these be attributed to parents? No, parents don't have such credit.
When the children grow up, they leave their parents, they have their own homes, they forget the nurturing grace of their parents, they only care about how little their parents give them, they are psychologically unbalanced! Can this blame them? No, if you want to complain, you can complain about your parents.
Who made you leave them with no inheritance? Who made you not know to save up more money for yourself in the first place? Who told you not to hold them tightly in the palm of your hand and educate them carefully?
What's the use of complaining today?
The son is not filial, and the father is at faultPity the hearts of parents all over the world!
-
The son does not teach, this problem has nothing to do with the relationship between the father, if you want to learn badly, others can't stop it, there is a saying that goes like this, learn bad for one day, learn well for a lifetime, this problem has nothing to do with the father, your father just teaches usually.
The truth of your life, he can't control you so much if he is stupid.
-
Maybe his father was not strict enough with him when he was a child and didn't teach him some principles of how to behave in the world, which led to his unfilial behavior when he grew up, after all, "at the beginning of man, nature is good", which is a factor; But there is another factor, that is, the environment in which he grew up led to his psychological defects; But it's not all my father's fault.
Finally, I also want to say: the tree wants to be quiet but the wind does not stop, and the child wants to raise but does not wait. Every parent has worked hard to raise us, so we should honor them.
-
Plant melons and get melons, plant beans and get beans
What kind of evil consequences are there, and the caregiver himself has no comparison?
There is so much sour nonsense on the top, and it's no wonder that the Q&A looks like this shit.
Let's get rid of my responsibilities.
If you don't raise it in the first place, can't you have so much trouble?
-
It should be "If you don't teach, your father's fault" and the next sentence is "If you don't teach strictly, the teacher is lazy." If you don't teach, it's your father's fault. If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy.
Meaning: It is the fault of parents who only provide food and clothing for their children without educating them well. It's just education, but not being strict is the laziness of being a teacher.
At the beginning of man, nature is good. Sex is similar, Xi is far away. Explanation:
Everyone is born with kindness, but due to the different growth process and acquired learning environment, the temperament has good and bad, and sex is transferred. The way of teaching is to be specialized. If you don't teach, sex is migration.
The way of teaching is to be specialized.
Xi Mengmu, choose a neighbor. If you don't learn, you will be cut off. Explanation:
During the Warring States period, Mencius's mother moved three times in order to provide Mencius with a good learning environment. Once Mencius skipped school, Mengzi's mother broke the weaving machine to educate Mencius. Dou Yanshan, there is a righteous side.
Teach five sons, and be famous. Dou Yanshan, there is a righteous side. Teach five sons, and be famous.
If you don't teach, it's your father's fault. If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy. Explanation: It is the fault of parents who only provide food and clothing for their children and do not educate them well. It's just education, but not being strict is the laziness of being a teacher.
If you don't learn, it's not appropriate. If you don't learn from the young, what is the old. Explanation: Children should not study well. If you don't get an education when you're a child, what will you do when you're old?
The Three Character Classic is a traditional Chinese enlightenment textbook. Among the ancient Chinese classics, the "Three Character Classic" is one of the most simple and easy to read books. The "Three Character Classic" draws on exemplary materials, including literature, history, philosophy, astronomy and geography, human ethics and righteousness, loyalty, filial piety and righteousness of traditional Chinese culture.
-
1. The second half of the sentence of the son who is not filial to the father is: "If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy".
2, from the "Three Character Classic", excerpt: "Dou Yanshan, there is a righteous prescription." Teach five sons, and be famous. If you don't teach, it's your father's fault. If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy. ”
3. Translation: In the fifth generation, Dou Yujun, a native of Yanshan, had a very good method of educating his sons, and the five sons he educated were very successful, and at the same time became famous in the imperial examination. It is the fault of parents who only provide food and clothing for their children and do not educate them well.
It's just education, but not being strict is the laziness of being a teacher.
-
Unfilial offspring. Source of the idiom: Ming Shi Nai'an's "Water Margin" Chapter 22: "Song Jiang, the son of unfilial piety, has been disobedient since he was a child, refuses to do his duty, and wants to be a official, saying in every way that he does not obey." ”
Idiom example sentence: Please forgive me for this.
Synonyms of the son of unfilial piety: Descendants of unfilial sons Buxiao: not as good as ancestors. It refers to the descendants who are unable to inherit the business and will of their ancestors or go against the cause or will of their ancestors.
Antonyms for unfilial sons: filial sons and virtuous grandchildren Children and grandchildren who are filial to their parents and ancestors are filial to their parents, and the descendants of filial sons and grandchildren are left and right, and the branches and leaves are better than the ancestors. "Yongxi Yuefu
Idiom grammar: as subject, object; Kai search is mostly used for self-humility after the break: The son beats Lao Tzu.
-
Explanation] It is the father's fault that he only provides food and clothing for his children and does not educate them well. It's just education, but not being strict is the laziness of being a teacher.
Enlightenment] Strict teachers produce high apprentices, and strict education is the inevitable way to the road to success. Although the strict requirements for children are the disadvantages of parents and teachers, children should also understand the painstaking efforts of parents and teachers, so as to consciously be strict with themselves.
Note: Not taught: Not taught.
Fault: Fault. Teacher: Teacher.
Laziness: laziness, here refers to dereliction of duty.
Once upon a time, there was a robber who did all kinds of evil, and after he did all the bad things, he was finally caught by the yamen. Because he committed many unforgivable sins, the county magistrate sentenced him to death. Before he was sentenced, the county magistrate asked him what he wanted, and the robber said:
I wanted to see my mother one last time. The county magistrate ordered his mother to be invited, and when their mother and son met, the mother's grief-stricken hugger son cried. Who knows, the robber actually bit off his mother's ear fiercely, and said sadly:
I hate my mother for never teaching me a lesson when I make mistakes, and now it's too late for me to regret it. "The robber's mother is half responsible for the robber's fate!