How did Manchester United sell to the Glazer family, and why did Manchester United fans oppose the G

Updated on physical education 2024-02-29
17 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It was the Glazer family through financing, that is, to put it bluntly, they didn't have that much money, but they borrowed enough money and bought enough ** of Manchester United, and then they became the largest controlling party of Manchester United, and then the law stipulates that the holding can be fully acquired at a certain stage, and it is okay. That's it. So now Manchester United is listening to the Glazer family.

    American capitalists generally do not have the kind of real money and real money in West Asia, they basically hold shares in the form of financing, and make profits from them, that is, they first borrow money to buy A shares (A shares are potential shares), and after buying A shares, they operate properly, and at the same time, A shares are potential stocks, so after A shares are born, they will repay the loan through the money earned from A shares. And Manchester United have indeed been making money, but the debt pressure is still huge. As far as the player circulation market with unconventional income expenditure is concerned, in addition to selling Ronaldo, Ferguson has been buying people, Nani Anderson Hargreaves is all at the 3,000 euro level, it may be that the Glazer family has miscalculated the economic situation, which currently leads to Manchester United making money, but still unable to make ends meet (interest on loans), so the current economic situation is more dangerous.

    But because the results are good and the market is good, it's much better than Liverpool.

    Testimonial: Finding a good dad is really the key!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Manchester United used to be the richest club in the world, with a lot of major shareholders and a lot of sponsors, but then the Grebe family bought over the shares, which seemed to be more than 70 percent at the time, and it became a 'privately owned' club, and it cost 100 million pounds to buy Manchester United, 300 million pounds of which was a loan, and his debt naturally became Manchester United's debt, and Manchester United went from being the richest club in the world to the most indebted club in the world.

    It is equivalent to the original collective ownership system becoming private ownership.

    Such people should be killed, and the money that Manchester United makes is put in their own pockets, and when people come to ask for debts, they will say: I don't have any money, or you can see what you can sell, and use it to pay off. As a result, the stars, stadiums, and so on became the targets of debt repayment.

    This boss estimates that he has to be careful when he goes out, and he may be killed by the Red Devils fans one day.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The Glazer family acquired more than 80% of the shares of the three largest shareholders of Manchester United at the time through financing, became the largest shareholder of Manchester United, and because of its large controlling share, it had the right to sell Manchester United's shares, become an unlisted club, complete a full takeover, turn Manchester United into a private club, and spent 100 million pounds on the acquisition of Manchester United, of which 300 million pounds was a loan, and since Manchester United had become his private property, he naturally passed on the debt to Manchester United.

    Although as a fan of Manchester United, I think it is hateful for the Glazer family to do this. But take a closer look at Manchester United's overall trajectory following the Glazer family takeover. Personally, I feel that the Glazer takeover has in fact made United more commercial, and some of the early signings (e.g. Evra, Vidic, Van der Sar) have been key players in United's success over the years, and the summer of 2007 has been an example of successful commercial recruitment (Nani Anderson, Hargreaves, Tewitz), who played an important role in Manchester United's Champions League triumph in 2008, and may even be the cornerstone of the post-Ronaldo era.

    In addition, due to Manchester United's debt problems, Manchester United has begun to reduce investment in reinforcements in recent years, and pay more attention to the development of young players (Evans Welbeck) and the introduction of excellent young players (such as Rafael, Fabio, Macheda), to a certain extent, so that the once forgotten Manchester United Academy has begun to be welcomed again.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Let's put it simply, so that you can refer to it conveniently.

    A European club is actually a business, and the owner of the team is the owner of the company.

    The Glazer family was optimistic about Manchester United's earning power, so they bought it, and when he took most of the shares, Manchester United was up to him. The previous shareholders were willing to sell, the Glazer was willing to buy, and the matter was done, which couldn't be simpler.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Before being acquired by the Glazer family, Manchester United was a ** listed company, and Manchester United was the first club to be listed in football Later, Manchester United was acquired by the Glazer for 100 million pounds, and Manchester United was also delisted from ** and became the "private property" of the Glazer family.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    If you really love football, I suggest you take a look at the golden ball written by Yan Qiang!

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The Glazer family: YesManchester United's "blood-sucking" and "lack of attention" are the main reasons why Manchester United fans are increasingly dissatisfied with the Glazer family。This is because the Glazer family has taken nearly 1.1 billion pounds from Manchester United since they bought it, but they have not increased their investment in Manchester United, which has gradually made Manchester United fall into decline. In such a situation, Manchester United fans will naturally feel that the Glazer family is the culprit that has caused Manchester United to go downhill, and will therefore oppose the Glazer family.

    The "bloodsucking" of Manchester United is the main reason why fans are dissatisfied with the Glazer family. It can be said that if you look at it from an investor's point of view, the Glazers see Manchester United as a cash cow.

    This is not surprising, given that Manchester United is one of the most prestigious clubs in the world. As for the fans, they are not averse to the Glazer family profiting from their investment in Manchester United. But you have to understand,If the Glazer family's profits were built on the basis that they were detrimental to Manchester United, the fans would not have agreed

    The main reason for this is that the Glazer family has taken too much money from Manchester United, which in turn has affected the healthy operation of Manchester United. In addition, the Glazer family has not invested enough in Manchester United, as in the remaining Premier League.

    The team's investors are in stark contrast. Therefore, in the eyes of fans, the Glazer family's approach is very bad for Manchester United, so they will naturally oppose the Glazer family.

    In addition,The Glazer family's "distraction" towards Manchester United is also an important reason why fans can't stand the Glazer family。Old Trafford, after all.

    It is already relatively dilapidated, and Manchester United have not worked on renovating the stadium and building new training facilities for many years, resulting in the team's training conditions have opened up a gap with those of other big clubs in the Premier League. Of course, the Glazer family did not fail to compromise in the face of growing opposition from Manchester United fans, but their mere plan to rebuild the existing stadium and expand the South Stand instead of building a new stadium is far from what United fans expect and naturally annoys United fans even more.

    It can be said that "bloodsucking" and "not paying attention" have made Manchester United fans a little unbearable to the Glazer family, so Manchester United fans' opposition to the Glazer family will naturally become more and more intense.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    They have one thing in common, and they are known as lifelong Manchester United fans. It was this group of billionaires who held a secret meeting in the office of Freshfields Law Firm on March 1 to discuss the acquisition plan. The initial plan was to gather 40 billionaire fans in the imitation studio, contribute 20 million each, and then borrow some money from the financial city to complete the acquisition and force the Glazer family out.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Since the Glazer family bought Manchester United in 2005 for 100 million pounds (about 100 million yuan), the Glazer family has always regarded the team as their own cash cow, and has taken about 1.1 billion pounds from Manchester United in the past 17 years. Among them, the billions of pounds were used to pay the interest on the loan when the club was acquired. The 1.1 billion pounds of money is stupid, and it also includes 100 million pounds of debt repayment.

    However, the United Kingdom** pointed out that the dividends of the Glazer family during this time period were 100 million pounds. For example, this year marks exactly 10 years since Manchester United listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and the Glazer family has now received more than £100 million in dividends. After the Glazer family took over, the directors received a total of £55 million from Manchester United, with a further £23 million being withdrawn as management fees.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    With two consecutive defeats in the new season, the team is at the bottom of the Premier League and will be fighting for relegation this season if they continue to do so. In addition to expressing their displeasure with the players, Manchester United fans pointed the finger directly at the Glazer family. Fans believe that the family has invested the least amount of money in Manchester United since taking over the club.

    Not only did it not cost huge sums of money to build a new stadium, but it was also very stingy to renovate Old Tratford. In terms of player recruitment, it is far less than other big teams in the Premier League, and Manchester United's youth system is also difficult to produce excellent players due to reduced investment. As a result, the team's record in recent years has been very poor.

    The summary is that Manchester United are not in the limelight, the buying strategy is wrong, the team has a poor record, and the stadium is outdated.

    Pitch investment is terrible. Manchester United has the lowest construction work of any Premier League giant. Liverpool, Chelsea and Tottenham Hotspur have all revamped their stadiums, with the stadium already seating more than 60,000 people.

    Arsenal also invested in the construction of the Emirates Stadium, which also has a capacity of more than 60,000 people. The gap is stark compared to Manchester United's investment in the stadium, which cost less than £100 million to renovate, not only did the stadium not add more seats, but the stadium facilities were very old. It directly affects the mood of fans watching the game.

    Bad player introduction. Manchester United have not dared to invest too much in players in recent years, and the scouts' scouting of players is also very inadequate. **The performance of the players brought in has declined very sharply, including Jadon Sancho 85 million euros, Maguire 80 million euros, Pogba 80 million euros, Lukaku 84.7 million euros, etc.

    Manchester United brought in players who did not consider their tactical system at all, and were just trying to make money, and many excellent players became victims. The team's results are naturally very poor.

    The youth system is terrible. Carrington's academy was once the best in the world. However, due to the reduction in investment, Manchester United's youth system has struggled to produce good players.

    The ceiling of players such as Marcus Rashford, Mason Greenwood, Jesse Lingard, McTominay and others has prevented them from being top players.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Because the current strength has been declining, and it has not achieved very good results for a long time.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The first point is that the opposition to the whole family is getting stronger and stronger, that is, they are really too loser, and the second point is that the whole family has not contributed anything, so everyone doesn't like this kind of family very much, so they reacted strongly.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Because since the Glazer family bought Manchester United, they have taken nearly 1.1 billion pounds from Manchester United, but they have not increased their investment in Manchester United, which has gradually made Manchester United fall into decline.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Ticket reasons are just one of them, and there are a few reasons why Manchester United fans are against the Glazer family

    1. The Glazer family's acquisition of Manchester United was acquired through financing loan debt, so the success of the acquisition is also equivalent to passing on these debts to Manchester United. What was supposed to be a profitable club began to turn into a cash cow for the Glazer family.

    2. The debt-ridden Manchester United has led to relatively little investment in the transfer market, and it is rare to sign a powerful player in the year of play.

    3. By selling off the core players in the team to pay off the debt, the team's lack of support has dropped significantly.

    4. In order to pay a huge amount of interest every year (about more than 3,000 W pounds), the Glazer family has repeatedly raised ticket prices and squeezed fans' funds.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Not a ticket, of course! Manchester United fans have never been short of money, but after the Glazer family bought Manchester United, a Manchester United club made a mortgage, so that the club took on a huge amount of debt UEFA has requirements for the club's economic situation, and in any case, the debt-ridden must have a great impact on team building, and the most serious thing is that you can't buy big-name stars, as a Manchester United fan, I admit that the team lineup that Lord Ferguson said is already very good, and the echelon construction is also good, but if you want to reproduce the glory of the 1999 treble, you still need to have a big introduction, and I want to cry this summer, why didn't I buy Ozil?! Cheap and young, creativity is also what Manchester United lacks the most now, Glazer get out of Manchester United, Manchester United will have hope, otherwise Lord Fold will retire, and the consequences will be unimaginable.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    The opposition to the Glazer family is due to the fact that Manchester United's ticket prices have been rising in the past two years, whether it is a set ticket or a loose ticket.

    Moreover, the Glazer has been relatively little invested in transfers, and it is rare to sign a strong player in the year of play.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Because after the Glazer family bought Manchester United, it brought a huge debt to Manchester United, because when the Glazer bought Manchester United, most of the funds came through bank loans, and now the acquisition is successful, these debts are all passed on to Manchester United, and the Glazer in order to pay a huge amount of interest (more than 3,000 W pounds) every year, he has repeatedly raised ticket prices to squeeze the fans' funds.

    But for the stinginess of the Glazer in the transfer market, I don't see that as the case, I think it's the gentleman who has a heart to focus on developing young people, after all, you buy a big player in his playing years, and it will hinder the development of young players.

Related questions
2 answers2024-02-29

About 100 million dollars, in pounds sterling, is 100 million, but at that time, the Glazer family borrowed 300 million pounds from Morgan Bank and more than 200 million from hedge **.

12 answers2024-02-29

Berbatov is a single striker, Rooney and Tevez are shadow forwards, Ronaldo, Hargreaves, Nani are midfielders, Evra, Ferdinand, Vidic, Brown are in the backline. Goalkeeper Van der Sar. >>>More

15 answers2024-02-29

Hello, I am very happy to answer for you: if the watch is flooded, it is recommended that you go to the regular Jaeger-LeCoultre watch after-sales center to let a professional technician help you detect and deal with it, it is not recommended that you go to some small repair points to avoid secondary damage to your watch, and also to avoid causing you some unnecessary trouble, the following is the Jaeger-LeCoultre after-sales center**, I hope I hope to help you.

7 answers2024-02-29

If you get along, you can get married, and if you don't get along, you can divide it, but it's better to get it early, after all, it's difficult for girls to get married when they reach a certain age, even if they look beautiful, Because others don't dare to ask for it.

2 answers2024-02-29

If you want to start a business, it is recommended that you choose a suitable entrepreneurial project, see if you have the qualifications of the relevant project, and work hard after finding the right project. Of course, capital is also a problem to consider in the process of starting a business, and if you have limited start-up capital, you can solve it through small loans. >>>More