Could the universe as we know it be a black hole itself?

I remember mentioning in a certain issue of Global Science that there is a cosmic model that assumes that our three-dimensional universe is the event horizon of a four-dimensional black hole.

This is certainly possible, and very likely.

There is a concept of "Schwarzschild radius" in physics, which is related to the mass of an object, and any object that has a radius less than the Schwarzschild radius will become a black hole.

The Schwarzschild radius of the Earth is about one centimeter, and the Schwarzschild radius of the Sun is about 3 kilometers.

However, it is more contrary to common sense that when the mass of an object is very large, its Schwarzschild radius is not as small as we think.

For example, the Schwarzschild radius of a megagalaxy is so large that if it were to become a black hole, its mass density would be even lower than that of air on Earth.

Then, the point is that we can now estimate the mass of the entire universe with some confidence, according to this estimate, the Schwarzschild radius of the universe is about 100-100 billion light years, and what is the currently known radius of the universe? That's about 130-14 billion light years.

That is, the scale of the universe is most likely smaller than its Schwarzschild radius, and in this sense, the universe is indeed a black hole.

Moreover, the universe is still expanding, and we don't know what will happen when the expanding universe goes beyond its Schwarzschild radius.

To put it simply, the universe is not a black hole. At least the universe as we know it is not a black hole.

First of all, we need to know what a black hole is. Black holes are celestial objects predicted by the general theory of relativity. It differs from other celestial bodies in that it is a space-time singularity.

It is often caused by the collapse of massive celestial bodies. A black hole defines a visual interface based on its mass. All objects, particles, and radiation that fall into the visual interface, cannot escape.

This is the most fundamental point that distinguishes black holes from dark stars under Newton's theory of gravity. This is also the reason why black holes are of interest – at the singularity at the center of the black hole, existing laws of physics fail.

Okay, so is the universe a black hole? It's an interesting question. Because at a cursory glance, it seems that there are many similarities between the two.

For example, a black hole has an event horizon from which light cannot escape, and the universe also has an event horizon, defined as the farthest distance that light can reach. Another example is that the critical density of a black hole is similar to the average density of the universe. But we have to see that, strictly speaking, the two are quite different.

Take horizons, for example. For black holes, the event horizon is a strictly one-way boundary, and matter can only lead from one side to the other. The position of the event horizon is the same for all observers.

The horizon of the universe is only somewhat special to the observer on Earth (the farthest distance that a person on the earth can see), and it is not a one-way boundary in itself, nor is it special in the universe. What's more, ordinary black holes are formed by matter that cannot resist gravity and collapse, and there is a singularity in the center where both general relativity and quantum mechanics fail. The universe does not have such a singularity, and the current dynamics of the universe can be explained entirely within the framework of general relativity.

Therefore, the so-called universe is a black hole, and no matter how it is defined, it only exists figuratively. In fact, these two are different.

For example, the so-called one said earlier"inside out"Black holes, which are just another way of describing the fact that the universe is expanding at an accelerated pace and the speed of light is limited.

It is important to note that although the universe is not a black hole now, many scientists are still working on the similarities between black holes and the universe. Because the universe also originated from a physical singularity in which both quantum mechanics and general relativity fail. In this sense, the ultimate explanation of black holes and the origin of the universe both requires the establishment of a new quantum gravitational theory.

The current scientific evidence is not enough to prove that our universe is a black hole.

A black hole is a celestial object predicted by general relativity, and a black hole defines an optical interface based on its mass.

There is no scientific basis for saying that our universe is a black hole.

The universe, that is, the universe of nature, is the general term for all space, time, matter and things, which is an aggregate that originates from its own structure and organization, is influenced by its motion mechanism, and has a vast range and multiple expressions.

The scientific knowledge and science technology we have now do not fully understand the complete black hole.

It is possible, but the current science and technology are not enough to prove our current conjectures.

We still can't make a guess about this, we can't fully understand it.

Is our universe a super black hole? It's a question that scientists can't be precise with, but the many astronomical wonders show that this is not entirely possible. Our universe itself is a separate time, and only super-black holes can separate time from other parts, so it is very likely that our universe exists in a giant super-black hole architecture.

The volume of the universe is about 93 billion light years, the mass is about 10 cubic grams of 80 cubic grams, and the relative density is about 5 hydrogen atoms per cubic decimeter, and if our universe is also a super black hole, the volume and other relative densities of that mass of the super black hole will be basically the same as our universe, is this kind of accident a little unbelievable?

Nowadays, the theory of cosmic expansion has long been recognized and followed by various relevant physics disciplines, and it is a discipline that can express the space of the universe and various astronomical wonders. Some experts believe that it is likely to be just a singularity of a giant black hole, and because this singularity absorbs a lot of chemicals, it causes the internal structure to work and other conditions to be out of balance, so it happens**.

This occurrence is actually the occurrence of singularities in super-black holes**, which causes the energy contained in singularities to run in all directions, which is reflected in the surge of all singularities, and every matter and energy is rushing outward and evolving, and its properties are more in line with Newton's speculation of super-black holes, so some researchers think that our universe itself is a super-black hole, although people have not found super-black holes in the universe so far, but or our universe is originally a super-black hole, if that is the case, Or it also shows that superblack holes and white holes can be transformed due to changes in mass.

For example, there are super black holes in our universe, but the mass of these black holes is too small compared to the universe, and the mass of this black hole should also have a boundary, and it is difficult to balance existence to a certain extent, and it may be transformed into a super black hole. Therefore, there is no definite direct evidence to prove whether we live in a super-black hole or a super-black hole at this stage, and it can only be said that inference cannot eliminate this possibility at all, and due to the accidental information and the temporal characteristics of the superblack hole and the universe, this possibility is not very large.

In fact, the universe itself is a black hole, there is such a possibility, the first point, the universe is a very large sphere, and then formed, the second point is that the universe has a very large mysterious property, and then the formation of this kind of black hole, very interesting.

I don't think it's possible, because scientists believe that the inside of a black hole is a void and nothing can exist.

Possibly, I think the whole universe is the most mysterious place, and it may really be a black hole that we don't know what it looks like, and hopefully one day we will know.

The evolution of celestial bodies is a gradual expansion of relative density, from ordinary planets to white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes. Correspondingly, the celestial factors are constantly dissolved due to the increase in working pressure, from molecular structures, molecules, and basically particles until they are restored to quantum technology. The former is a closed management system generated by the fitness movement of quantum technology, which belongs to the scope of the material that resolves the disadvantages and returns to school.

The latter is the least particle defined and quantitatively analyzed by Planck's constant h, which has the characteristic of being inseparable, and belongs to the range of kinetic energy. Black holes are the final link in the evolution of celestial bodies. As the saying goes, if it is too much, its final fortune is to transform into a white hole, and complete the life of celestial grinding in the form of a CF supernova or quasar outbreak.

As a result, black holes are made up of quantum technology that, in the process of convergence, converts chemical matter into better kinetic energy. Therefore, the essence of a black hole is the accumulation of kinetic energy, which is the dissipative structure of kinetic energy.

If people are blind and devoid of the fact that they belong to the black hole, then where did the universe come from, needless to say, the universe has become the dark energy in the black hole? I heard that black holes are not harmonious, and all chemicals will be torn apart and turned into particles as long as they are swallowed by the black hole, and finally they will become dark energy, things that cannot be seen. The relative density, volume, and mass of the universe are similar to those of a black hole of the same size, with a volume of about 93 billion light-years, a mass of about 10 to the 80th power, and a relative density of about 5 hydrogen atoms per cubic meter.

And if our universe is also a black hole, the size and other hardness of the black hole of that quality will be almost the same as that of our universe, whether we live in a black hole or a white hole, there is no accurate proof to confirm at this stage, only inference can not clear this probability, and because of the accidental information and the spatial characteristics of the black hole and the universe, this kind of probability is not very large. All in all, people can't see what they can't see, and people can survive as long as they have a cheerful position.

Our cosmic canopy may be in a black hole; I think that our universe itself is a very large vortex, galaxies are constantly moving and changing, and the average density of the universe is greater than the density of the critical point, the universe will change, and it is normal for infinite reincarnation to be envious.

Yes, of course, because black holes are made up of quantum technology, and there are many black holes in the universe, plus our understanding of the universe needs to be improved.

No, black holes are made up of quantum technology that converts chemicals into better kinetic energy in the process of closing the Calendar Bureau. Therefore, the essence of a black hole is the accumulation of kinetic energy, which is the dissipative structure of kinetic energy.

Is our universe in a black hole? What is the basis for this conjecture? The evolution of celestial bodies is a gradual expansion of density, from ordinary large planets to white dwarfs, neutron stars and wormholes.

Correspondingly, the influencing factors of the star are also constantly melting due to the increase in pressure, from the molecular formula, molecular structure and most of the particles until they are reduced to quantum technology. The former is a closed system management generated by the sports and fitness of quantum technology, which belongs to the category of chemical substances.

The latter type is defined and quantified by Planck's constant h, at least particles, which have inseparable properties and belong to the category of mechanical energy. Black holes are the final stage in the evolution of stars. As the saying goes, the pole of the object must be reversed, and its final fate is to transform into a superblack hole, ending the life of the star in the form of a CF supernova or quasar explosion.

Thus, black holes are made up of quantum technology that transforms compounds into convenient mechanical energy in the process of contraction. Therefore, the essence of a superblack hole is the aggregation of kinetic forces, which is a dissipative structure of kinetic forces.

If everyone belongs to the super black hole, then where did the universe come from, let alone the dark energy in the super black hole? Hearing that super-black holes are not harmonious, all compounds just need to be swallowed by super-black holes, and they will be torn off into particles, and eventually they will become dark energy, invisible things. The density, capacity, and quality of the universe are also very similar to those of a superblack hole of the same size, with a capacity of about 93 billion light-years, a mass of about 10 and 80 cubic grams, and a density of about one cubic meter and about 5 hydrogen atoms.

And if our universe is also a super black hole, the size of the super black hole of that mass and its intensity will be basically the same as that of our friends' universe, whether we live in a super black hole or super black hole, there is no accurate confirmation to be confirmed, only inference can not eliminate this probability, and because of unintentional information and the characteristics of super black hole and space space, this possibility is not very large. In general, the invisible objects are not seen from beginning to end, and there is only a cheerful part for everyone to survive.

According to many astronomical phenomena, this statement is also very likely; The main reason for this conjecture is that our universe itself is a very independent space-time, and usually only black holes can separate space-time from other parts, so our universe may also exist in the framework of a very huge black hole.