Which one is better, D40 or D3000

Ha, is this even better?

The D40 has been discontinued.

It has been four generations from D40, D40X, D60 to D3000.

The number of pixels has been increased from 6 million to 10 million, the focus point has changed from 3 to 11 points (one cross-focus), the shutter life has been changed from 50,000 to 100,000 times, the lens has been stabilized, and there is dust removal.

**You can also see it, D40 sets are about 3K, D3000VR sets are about 4K.

I only know that the D40 is the worst DSLR in Nikon, and its ISO minimum is only 200,6 million pixels, which is worse in the SLR, but it is very affordable, and it is much better than the card player! The new one is definitely better than it! This is the most popular explanation, it is recommended not to buy D40

The D3000 has a minimum ISO of 100, 10.2 million effective pixels, and uses the latest image processor: Expeed

ISO stands for sensitivity, and it's one of the most important factors in determining image quality! Anyway I wouldn't buy a D40.

I use D40, an entry-level SLR machine, **low, the first choice for practice.

If you don't let it be copied, then you can see for yourself

Hee-hee......

The 500d performance will be a little bit better, but the case quality D3100 will be much better.

The D3100 doesn't have a motor, and there are only a few cheap lenses that don't autofocus, but a lot of people like manual focusing, and I think it's fun to do it manually.

If you don't plan to invest tens of thousands, recommend Nikon, Nikon low-end can still be used, Canon low-end is too rubbish, 500d hanging a sleeve will be laughed at.

Upstairs was a little excited, and I'm also a Nikon fan.

D300S is Nikon's main mid-range SLR, and the imaginary enemy is Canon's 7D, and the two have a lot in common, both are non-full bodies, both have strong continuous shooting functions, and both have good focusing performance. Nikon's high-end professional SLR is a number, such as the D1 series, the D2 series and now the latest D3 series, which is the same as Canon, Canon's high-end SLR is 1D series.

D80 is Nikon's entry-level SLR, when it was listed, there was no D3000 such a more entry-level SLR, I just happened to have two colleagues, one is D80 and the other is D300S, in the case of the same lens, the image quality is roughly the same, but D300S continuous shooting is much stronger, focusing ability is also D300S is much better, D80 is significantly inferior to D300S when the aperture is higher than F4, the probability of focusing is higher, In addition, the driving ability of the fuselage motor is also much better than that of the D300S, and the focusing time of the D300S is much faster than that of the D80 when using the same Nikon small steel gun. If you just usually shoot landscape portraits, the D80 is completely competent, the D300S can do it, and the D80 can do it; If you are shooting high-speed themes, such as sports, news capture, etc., the D300S reflects the advantages.

It is not a grade machine, and there is a difference of d90 d7000 d100 d200 d300 in the middle

D80 interrupt entry, D300s professional.

D80** is now more than 4000 second-hand.

D300S 1W more.

This doesn't need to be compared, D300S is a professional digital SLR, D80 is just a general mid-range DSLR, the parameters are much worse, do you still use this comparison?

If it's just a dot shoot, the two entry-level SLRs you listed are more than enough for their own sleeves, provided that the light source is a little better, and it's best to buy a tripod if you have a macro, not too expensive, about 100 is enough.

If only these two were compared:

1. Workmanship: I don't know if you've seen the real machine, Canon's 450D, 500D, 550D, feel far worse than D3000.

2. Lens: Nikon's low-end pullover is good, while Canon's red-ring head is great, but the low-end pullover is recognized as a dog's head.

3. Function: Why do you need LCD to buy SLR? I really don't understand, some SLR LCD real-time framing is for those SLR with camera function for convenient photography, not for you to take pictures (except for special angles), when have you ever seen a person with a SLR take an LCD viewfinder, if there is one, you can only call him "You still use home DC".

The D3000 does not have a body motor, not a lens motor, which must be clarified. A body without a body motor can only autofocus when using a lens with a motor, otherwise it can only focus manually. The D3000's sleeve (18-55mm) has a motor and is stabilized.

And now most of Nikon's lenses have motors, and there is no problem with using them on the D3000, but only a few of them don't have motors, and you don't collect lenses.

Overall, Nikon's low-end entry-level SLR is more generous than Canon's in terms of body workmanship and the quality of the sleeve; If you don't have a bad money, you can choose Canon and go directly to the red circle, which is indeed out of reach. If you want to be economical, just Nikon, be kind, and if you want to add lenses in the future, it will also be economical.

These two are actually good, with 18-55 sleeves.

The main thing is the landlord's set, and the lighting must be done well, because the effect must be good, and the camera is just a tool.

So, the set, the lighting is very important.

If you can, put in a flash.

You've listed the shortcomings of the D3000, that's enough, just 450D.

It is enough to shoot the clothes pullover, but the trinkets must be with a macro lens, otherwise the image is too small.

Sharpness is only the imaging style, not sharpness, and the sharpness can be adjusted within the camera.

1. The landlord asks: Which is better to buy D3200 or D7000?

Answer: It depends on the landlord.

If I had the final say, I would buy the D7000.

2. The landlord asked: Is it to increase investment to buy a D7000, or to buy a cheap D3200 to play?

A: The answer is the same as above.

3. The landlord asked: If you want to continue to play in the later stage, will D3200 not be enough?

A: No! 4. The landlord asked: Will the D7000 be broken by me when I get started?

Answer: As long as the landlord does not operate brutally, it will not.

In my humble opinion: the landlord doesn't have so much "energy", hehe.

5. The landlord asked: Is the body of the SLR camera a consumable?

A: Compared with traditional mechanical cameras, the current body is consumables.

However, it also depends on the attitude of the landlord.

If you don't want to pursue the latest features, performance, and models, you should be fine with a body for 10 years or 8 years.

If you're just playing around, d3200; If you want to play deeper, go straight to D7000. Warning: SLR is a bottomless pit!

Simple reply: 7000 if you have money, 3200 if you have less money.