Debate on whether genetically modified foods are safe

Updated on healthy 2024-02-09
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    First of all, it is necessary to understand the principle of genetic alteration, mutations, radioactive elements, which must not occur in food.

    Do you eat bananas and become triploids, of course not?

    Are the GM cooked vegetables you eat radioactive? Funny.

    Darwin's theory of evolution is a proven axiom that everything will evolve in a favorable direction.

    Why is rice a good hybrid? Genetically modified.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The most important and critical question is the use of viral vectors in transgenic organisms, and it is still unknown whether these viral vectors mutate to encode some toxic proteins. I think you have to leave that question out there.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Genetically modified foods do have the possibility of genetic drift, so don't be blindly optimistic.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    In order to prevent the transfer of some genes that may be harmful to human health or environmental safety into recipient organisms in the process of genetic manipulation, or unpredictable changes in recipient organisms caused by genetic manipulation, affecting human health and environmental safety, the safety of genetically modified organisms must be scientifically evaluated.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    The debate about genetically modified foods has been around for a long time, and it is mainly reflected in two aspects.

    First, the safety of genetically modified foods, the debate focuses on whether the introduction of foreign genes will produce unknowable bad characteristics, such as toxicity and nutrient deficiencies, and whether it will cause harm and damage to the human body;

    Second, the ecological security of genetically modified foods, the debate focuses on whether the consumption of genetically modified crops will lead to genetic contamination and whether it will destroy the balance and diversity of the original biota.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    At present, it is generally believed that genetically modified food has not been found to be harmful to the human body, at least most people in the academic community think it is safe, but when it comes to food, many non-professionals often have some other views, and it can also be said that they use people's fear to promote their own opinions, after all, people are more likely to reject than recognize genetically modified food. However, in the future, with the growth of the world's population and the reduction of arable land, we will have to vigorously promote genetically modified food.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Summary. I'm glad to answer this question for you, so far, there is not a single case of GMO being harmful to the human body, and how can you completely dismiss it?

    Plant-based GMO technology improves the shelf life of tomatoes, and without GMOs, can there be enough fresh fruits and vegetables every day**? There are also animal genetically modified foods, which transfer human genes into cattle or other animals, and there are genetic drugs in milk, which can be the best disease, so don't you use the drugs in cow's milk to let patients endure torture?

    Genetically modified foods can reduce the use of pesticides, are you willing to continue to use the original method of spraying pesticides in large quantities to increase yields while paying a heavy price for polluting the environment?

    Questions asked during the debate on whether genetically modified foods are safe or not?

    I'm glad to answer this question for you, so far, there is not a single case of GMO being harmful to the human body, and how can you completely dismiss it?

    Plant-based GMO technology improves the shelf life of tomatoes, and without GMOs, can there be enough fresh fruits and vegetables every day**? There are also animal genetically modified foods, which transfer human genes into cattle or other animals, and there are genetic drugs in milk, which can be the best disease, so don't you use the drugs in cow's milk to let patients endure torture?

    Genetically modified foods can reduce the use of pesticides, are you willing to continue to use the original method of spraying pesticides in large quantities to increase yields while paying a heavy price for polluting the environment?

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The safety of genetically modified technology and genetically modified products is a common concern of the public. In recent years, with people's attention to food safety, there have been more and more debates about the safety of genetically modified products.

    Since 1996, the world's first case of genetically modified crops planted, genetically modified crops and genetically modified products have gone through more than 30 years of development, although the Internet has reported a lot of unsafe incidents about genetically modified food, but in the end were disclosed as rumors. Genetically modified as a technology is neutral, and the products developed by this neutral technology need to be evaluated for a series of safety. Only genetically modified products that have undergone safety evaluation can be marketed, and the safety of genetically modified products on the market is the same as that of traditional food.

    In other words, the safety of genetically modified products approved for marketing after safety evaluation is also guaranteed, which is equivalent to traditional food. From the perspective of scientific research, Zhongming Rent has reached an authoritative conclusion on the safety of genetically modified products by many international professional institutions, that is, the genetically modified products approved for marketing are safe. From the perspective of production and consumption practices, no confirmed GMO food safety incidents have been found so far.

    Of course, people's acceptance of new things requires a time process, and whether genetically modified products are completely harmless to consumers' lives and health and the environment also needs a long-term time test. Lack of sale.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The four opposing sides of the GM Food Debate concluded that GM technology does more harm than good.

    Hello, dear, Dan Qiaoyuan asked for genetically modified food debate to summarize the four arguments and wide sales, that is, the discussion that genetically modified technology does more harm than good: The biggest risk of genetically modified food is the uncontrollability of the future. Unknown varieties of transgenic crops can be tested by the commonly used promoter sequences, marker genes, commonly used disease, insect and herbicide resistance genes, and even T-DNA sequences are also feasible.

    With the rapid development of technology, the rejection and collapse technology of marker genes has matured, if a new promoter is used, or the promoter of the plant itself is developed, and the target gene is an inactive gene, the gene gun technology or other non-Agrobacterium-mediated new technology is used. In the case of blind testing, it is difficult to detect whether it is a genetically modified crop. Hope mine can help you

Related questions
3 answers2024-02-09

Never giving up is a belief.

When the flowers are gone, there will be a time for them to bloom again, and when the sun will set and rise again, but when people's faith has collapsed, there will be no time to rebuild. Once you give it up, there's never a second time to have it. >>>More

23 answers2024-02-09

I hope it's not genetically modified.

31 answers2024-02-09

Eating genetically modified foods is no safer than eating pesticide residues.

11 answers2024-02-09

Long-term use of computers will greatly enhance some abilities of the brain (become smarter), such as visual acuity, finger dexterity, logical thinking ability, and the knowledge and amount of knowledge acquired by computer networks are also quite amazing. >>>More

10 answers2024-02-09

I think the pros outweigh the disadvantages, and the disadvantage of going online is playing games, however, this depends on the person.