85mmF1 8 lens 35mmF1 8 which is better

If your machine is in a non-full format DX format, it is recommended that you do not need to buy a 35 prime focus, this head will not work as well as it should on a non-full set machine.

Is 85 focal lengths best for a full-body portrait?

85 This focal length is the focal length that photographers often use to shoot people, so it is also called portrait focal length, on the whole set 85 can be a good shot of the whole body or bust, and on the APS-C is 127, often used to shoot headshots, so it depends on the type of body you use!

Both of these are prime lenses, each with different focal lengths and different uses.

35mm is considered wide-angle.

85mm is considered a medium focus.

85mm is ideal for portraits with blurred backgrounds.

The 35mm is suitable for shooting landscapes, but of course the 17mm is better if possible.

Anyway, there's no comparison!

85 counts as a medium-range focal length, while 35 is already close to a wide-angle focal length.

If I had to choose, I'd pick 35!

There is no comparison.

If I had to choose one of the two, I would choose 85

85 is suitable for portraits.

35's suitable for shooting landscapes.

Canon lenses and Sigma lenses, one is a full-frame SLR lens, and the other is an APS-C mirrorless lens. The two have different positioning and different performance indicators, and they are two different lenses, which are not easy to compare together. In their respective fields, they are all very good portrait lenses.

Sigma is an APS-C format mirrorless lens, this lens is mounted on the APS-C format mirrorless camera, and its equivalent focal length is about 85mm, which is a very good portrait focal length. Coupled with the large aperture design of this lens itself, this lens is perfect for portraits. Its sharpness, color, and bokeh performance are all excellent.

The Canon lens is an EF-mount full-frame SLR lens. This lens is a great portrait head among DSLR lenses. Its focal length is typical of portrait focal lengths, and it has a wide aperture design. The image quality is excellent, and the portrait results are excellent.

What these two lenses have in common is that they are both portrait heads. All of them have high image quality.

However, these two lenses are not very easy to put together and ......One of them is an APS-C format mirrorless lens, and the other is a full-frame SLR lens, and the platforms are different, so they can't ......be compared togetherIt can only be said that on their respective platforms, they are all the best options for portrait heads.

Both are portrait lenses, and if they are paired correctly, they have a similar angle of view. However, there is actually no comparison, the Sigma 56 is an APS-C mirrorless lens, which means that you can only use this lens if your machine is an APS-C mirrorless (mirrorless) camera. If your body is an APS-C format SLR, or a full-frame SLR or mirrorless, you won't be able to use this lens.

The Canon 85 is a full-frame SLR lens, and although it can be used in both DSLR, mirrorless, full-frame, and APS-C formats, Canon has a newer and better RF85 in full-frame mirrorlessness, and there is no need to adapt. In the case of APS-C format, 85mm is used, and the viewing angle is similar to 135mm, which is much narrower, and it is definitely not used indoors.

In short, if your body is a mirrorless APS-C format, then use the Sigma 56, and if your body is a full-frame SLR, use the 85. If your fuselage is something other than this, then there should be a better or more suitable option.

85mm prime lenses with different specifications ......Such as versions, such as versions, such as versions, such as versions, ......These lenses of different specifications have different performance and positioning. Which one is better needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

If analyzed in absolute performance, it should be that the lens with a larger aperture is ......For example, the version of the 85 must be a very good lens ......But this is not absolutely ......Some versions of the 85 are actually very good, at least not ...... worse than the 85 version in terms of absolute performance and positioning

If analyzed in terms of cost performance, the version of the 85 must have a higher cost-effective ......The 85 performance of this specification is very good, and the ** is not high, for users who don't want to invest too much, this lens is the most cost-effective choice.

Therefore, there is no single answer to the question of which lens is better......Different users have different needs, and the corresponding results are different ......In this way, every 85 must have something to offer and a good shot!

85 fixed, there is no very bad one, and there is no weak brigade in fixed focus.

Which brand are you referring to?

Canon is good, the sharpness is high but expensive, and when you buy a lens, you have to look at your own camera mount and then choose the manufacturer, otherwise the bayonet is not right and it is useless

Disadvantages: Because it is a double Gaussian planar structure, the performance of the large aperture is not good, and the image quality is improved after the aperture gap is reduced, but the out-of-focus imaging is not ideal, the color is dry, the contrast is slightly lower, and the level is insufficient when the light is relatively large, and the appearance is not good-looking. The out-of-burn effect is relatively dry.

Pros: Affordable, quick focus response, no problem with posing and capturing, excellent image quality when the aperture is received.

Available in 24-70mm2There is no need to buy 8mm lenses for 50 lenses.

There are many occasions where 24-70 is more practical than 50, such as events, weddings, records, landscapes, and even portrait shooting, etc. 50 The limit is still a lot, and some specific restrictions will cause problems such as the scene is not large enough and the people are not complete.

It's still a little stronger than the 70 to 50 of a portrait's half-body or full-body blur. If you have 24-70, you can basically do without 50. However, the 50 is cost-effective, and many poor players need such a lens.

Summary. The differences between kissing and Canon lenses are explained as follows1Kiss, first of all, the cliché of different focal lengths is as follows: 1

First of all, the focal length range is 85mm! 2.

Kiss and kiss: the focal length range is 50mm! 3.

There is also a difference in characteristics: the use of a large-diameter precision grinding aspherical lens, even at the maximum aperture, still maintain excellent contrast and resolution! 4.

Kiss and kiss, and: Super Spectral Coating technology effectively suppresses ghosting and glare!

What is the difference between Canon lenses and lenses?

The differences between kissing and Canon lenses are explained as follows1Kiss, first of all, the cliché of different focal lengths is as follows: 1Kiss, first of all:

The focal length range is 85mm! 2.Kiss and kiss and:

The focal length range is 50mm! 3.There are different characteristics of kissing :

The use of a large-diameter precision-ground aspherical lens ensures excellent contrast and resolution, even at the widest aperture. 4.Kiss and kiss and:

The Super Spectral Coating technology effectively suppresses ghosting and glare.

Kiss, of course, there is also their own strengths, the specific instructions are as follows: 1, kiss first of all: the optimized lens coating effectively suppresses ghosts and glare; A ring ultrasonic motor, a high-speed CPU, and an improved focusing algorithm combine to deliver faster and more accurate autofocus. 2.

It also adopts a circular aperture design, which makes the background blur more perfect; Full-time manual focus and distance information! 3.Kiss and kiss and:

The annular ultrasonic motor drives the autofocus of the lens, and it also has a full-time manual focus function, and the new sealing treatment makes it more effective against dust and water drops.