How Discipline Promotes Personality Development 5

Categories: Life >> common sense of life.

Problem description: Personality is something that everyone has.

It depends on how you look at it.

Analysis: The restriction of discipline and the promotion of individuality are a pair of contradictory opposites. It is not only conducive to the publicity of personality, but also restricts the disorderly publicity of personality.

I understand that what you mean by "discipline" should be a general term, which includes the conventions of a group of people, such as the rules of playing cards when playing cards, and the time and requirements for commuting to and from work. Large to international conventions. These "disciplines" are universally binding norms of conduct within the scope of application.

It is generally believed that human personality can be represented in two aspects: one is thought; The second is behavior. Discipline is the behavioral part of a person's personality.

Discipline restricts the behavioral part of a person's personality for three main purposes: first, to restrict people's behavior so that they do not harm the will, interests or fairness of the majority of the people. Second, to guide people's behavior so that they act according to the will, interests, or fairness of the majority.

Thirdly, sanctions for violations of discipline.

Going against the wishes of the majority of people, circumventing the constraints of "discipline", exceeding the scope of "discipline" allowing the orange argument, and excessively publicizing one's own personality and behavior is bound to cause harm to oneself; It will also cause harm to the legitimate interests of others, the collective, and even society. On the contrary, if we can actively forge ahead in the direction encouraged by "discipline", it will bring greater legitimate benefits to others, the collective, or the whole society, and the whole society will make progress.

In today's quality education, more and more attention is paid to the development of personality, and the more attention is paid to the development of personality, the more we cannot ignore the requirements for discipline, and the development of personality is not a willful development. We agree that discipline does not limit personality development! There are two reasons for this:

1. From the process of formation and development of personality, we can know that the development of personality is inseparable from the cultivation of commonality, and the development of personality and the cultivation of commonality are interrelated and complementary. Only the personality cultivated on the basis of a certain commonality is called the real "personality", if the blind "out of position" is not the real personality, but can only be regarded as a show. Discipline is to provide a platform for everyone to cultivate commonality, with the regulation of discipline, so that personality can be more healthy development on a normal platform, so we believe that discipline will not limit the development of personality.

Let's start from the purpose of discipline, discipline is to standardize, guide and educate people's daily behavior, in order to cultivate people's civility, courtesy, diligence and harmony. The development goal of a good personality can only be formed and show its effectiveness characteristics in an environment of harmony with others and the collective. Moreover, civilized behavior and habits are themselves a manifestation of a person's good personality.

A person who is good at self-discipline is a person with a real personality. Facts have also proved that under the conditions of well-organized discipline management, talents who are both civilized and disciplined and have personality have indeed been cultivated. All in all, we believe that discipline does not limit the development of personality.

2. As we all know, under the command of the traffic light, the vehicle can drive in an orderly manner and reduce unnecessary conflicts, which is just like the relationship between personality and discipline, without the command and guidance of discipline, the personalities between people will conflict with each other, hindering the development of their own (personality), in such an environment, how to better develop the performance? Not only does each person have their own personality, but these personalities will develop very differently due to differences in individual acquired conditions. When people are exposed to unfavorable environmental conditions, the development of personality can be suppressed.

Discipline coordinates these contradictions, it provides an orderly and harmonious environment for the development of personality, and makes the development of personality better! And people's vivid and lively personality will add vitality to discipline, how can discipline limit the development of personality?

Discipline only regulates people's thoughts, but it does not restrict people's behavior. So discipline does not stop the development of personality!

To sum up, we believe that discipline does not limit the development of personality! Thank you!

As the saying goes, "there are no rules", so how do you see the opposing debater? Without the constraints of rules and discipline, how can that person develop?

We know what the word "development" means. Anyone who has studied philosophy knows that "development" is a kind of progress towards the good side of things, and it represents a good and correct side. If "development is seen only as a change", then the other party's view is that "discipline is not conducive to the development of personality", for example:

You are a fashion designer, you pursue the development of personality, then the clothes you design must be within the scope of the law, you have to design a real tiger skin coat for yourself, it is quite individual, but for your own personality, you must go to the zoo or reserve to hunt a South China tiger, will you? You won't, because that's illegal, right? So, do you still stick to the point you started with?

I've asked you a few questions to consider about this (but it all depends on the answer). It is recommended to grasp the mistakes and contradictions in the positive answer, and do not get into the topic step by step in the answer. Question 1: If, in the positive sense, discipline restricts the development of people's personality, does that mean that we cannot cultivate our own personality while abiding by discipline?

Problem 2: Discipline promotes personality development. (If the opposing defense friend repeatedly emphasizes that discipline restricts the development of personality.) Apparently ignoring the importance of the existence of organizational discipline and overemphasizing personality development, then, just ask:

What are the ultimate consequences of putting one's personality above organizational discipline? It's just going to hit a wall everywhere!

Problem 3: Discipline can create a good social environment, which can promote the development of personality. In Marx's materialist dialectics, there is a discussion of freedom and law, which says that the law is formulated to make everyone independent and free. From this point of view, the law does not restrict the development of personality, and to a certain extent, discipline can promote the healthy growth of personality.

So from the positive point of view, discipline will limit the development of people's personality, isn't it the same as a kite can fly without a kite string?

Discipline is a kind of management, and without discipline is equivalent to indulging oneself. Personality is a kind of self-expression, and you can give full play to yourself in study or work. Discipline is often just a constraint on some kind of bad behavior, and it does not conflict with personality.

And you are about using your individuality to contribute to the collective.

You first ask, are you disciplined? Then ask, will this limit your development? If so, then all schools are not restricting our development.