Do adult children have the right to interfere in their parents finances?

I think there is.

Since the children have reached adulthood and are all a family, they have the right to take care of the family's finances. But now in many families in our country, children actually have no right and no awareness to ask about the family's financial situation.

From the beginning of elementary school, children have a concept of money and know that money can be exchanged for what they want. But at that time, we often gave money from our parents, and rarely asked about the family's finances, and even if we asked, our parents would think that you were a child and knew what to do.

Until you reach adulthood and go to college, you don't necessarily know your family's finances, and property has always been a secret in every family.

I actually regret one of the things I regret now, that is, when I was in college, I didn't ask about my family's financial situation, so that when my family had a financial crisis, I didn't even have a chance to recover it except for losses.

At that time, even if you wanted to ask, your parents would not tell you. In their eyes, you will always be a child, you will never understand anything, you just need to study hard, you don't care about other things, if you insist on asking, it will attract a scolding from your parents.

Therefore, in such a family environment, adult children do not dare to ask such sensitive questions.

In my opinion, I think that children are actually more sensitive than their parents, they have already understood many truths, and they also have a sense of family involvement and participation in family affairs.

Parents should not always treat their children as children, there are some things they can give you advice. For example, when I was in college, one of my classmates suggested that my parents buy a house in Xiong'an New Area, because during class, the teacher mentioned such a new information, and my parents didn't know a lot of information about doing business every day.

Therefore, I believe that adult children have the right to interfere in their parents' finances and help with some financial planning and advice. As a member of a family, finances are not just a matter for the parents, but for the family.

I think that under normal circumstances, children have no right to interfere with their parents' finances, but the problem is that many elderly people are deceived now, if this is the case, I think children should be admonished, or use methods to stop it, rather than blindly manage.

First of all, let's talk about the two old people who were deceived.

The first is my father, I am a person who will never interfere with my parents' finances, they spend their own salaries, buy whatever they like, go to ** if they like, and I am happier to see them live such a chic retirement life.

But I remember one night when I went back to my parents' house for dinner, my father was very angry and anxious, I asked my mother what he was doing, and my mother said, I don't know, it seems that there is a sum of money that cannot be transferred. I went over and asked him, but he got angry, thought I was in charge of his money, and scolded me. Later, I learned that he was urged to transfer 30,000 yuan to a ** that day.

Later, I called ** to my husband, and my husband called ** to customer service, we concluded that we must have been deceived, my husband happened to go to Beijing on a business trip, so I went to see it according to the above address, and there was no such company at all.

After I came back, when my husband and I took my dad to the police, my dad was still talking for **, saying no, people must have encountered something difficult, but he was reprimanded by the police, and he really felt that he had been deceived.

So, since then, I have worked with my mother to manage his money and not let him get so much money casually, which is also a helpless thing.

The other is my friend's mother, a rural person, who has no retirement salary and lives on a few children, but was fooled by a person who sells health care equipment with tens of thousands of dollars, and my friend was already depressed at the time, because she really didn't know how to explain this problem to her mother, because she herself sells medical equipment, and she knows that the profits of these things are outrageous.

So, I think there is such a problem, and we should take care of it. If there is no such problem, then the parents are the parents' and you can't control it.

No rights! Even parents have the right to make their own choices. Children have no right to interfere unless the parents give their consent. Especially since our parents have worked hard to raise us, they have the right to choose how to spend their money to make the rest of their lives happier.

If the parents are in a normal state, I don't feel the right to intervene, and if the parents are confused, the children can act as guardians.

I don't think it's dry, after all, it's your parents' property and not your property, and you have to know what to do.

Children have no right to interfere with their parents' property, and parents have the right to freely distribute their own Bright Oak property. The lawful private property of citizens shall not be infringed upon, and private property shall be protected by law, and no one can interfere with it, not even biological children, nor shall they have the right to interfere with the disposition of their parents' property. Citizens' personal property, including citizens' income, houses, savings, daily necessities, cultural relics, libraries, forests, livestock and means of production permitted by law, and other legal property.

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

The lawful property of private individuals is protected by law, and no organization or individual is prohibited from encroaching, looting, or destroying it.

Constitution of the People's Republic of China

Article 13. The lawful private property of citizens is inviolable.

The State protects citizens' private property rights and inheritance rights in accordance with the provisions of law.

The State may, in accordance with the provisions of law, expropriate or expropriate citizens' private property and compensate them for the needs of the public interest.

Of course, children can not interfere with their parents' finances, parents have the freedom to dispose of their own finances, children should struggle by themselves, get everything they want without selling the hall is through the way of possessing their parents' finances, parents work hard to pull their children up, and if they do not return to their parents, they will be sorry for their parents, and they will do too much.

Children do not have the right to interfere in the parents' finances, but if only one party is left, and the children have the right to share the property of the other party, if there is a will, it shall be handled according to the will.

Of course, this can't, they can only make a suggestion, whether they listen to it or not, and their children have no right to interfere.

Children do not have the right to interfere in their parents' finances, it is their own right.

No, unless you understand that the wild parents don't have the ability to take care of themselves!

Otherwise, this kind of behavior will be punished by heaven, and this kind of shouting children will definitely end up with lifelong disabilities and a long life in the future!

Of course you can't, you can only dissuade you from doing things and doing self-discipline, I can only say this, you can't interfere too much, and the place must be opposed.

Anyone who is an adult has personal finances, and no one else has the right to interfere.

The niece must not be able to tell the financial situation of her parents, but if the financial situation is related to herself.

Children can give their opinions! As for whether the parents accept it or not, it's their own business.

If you want to say that interference is unlikely, you can only give advice, and it is their business whether they listen or not.

Article 13: Elderly care for the elderly is based on the home, and family members shall respect, care for, and care for the elderly.

Article 14: Supporters shall perform their obligations to provide financial support, daily care, and spiritual comfort to the elderly, and take care of the special needs of the elderly. Supporters refer to the children of the elderly and other persons who have the obligation to support them in accordance with the law. The spouse of the supporter shall assist the supporter in fulfilling the maintenance obligation.

Article 15: Supporters shall ensure that the sick elderly receive timely care and care; For the elderly who have financial difficulties, medical expenses shall be provided. For the elderly who are unable to take care of themselves, the caregiver shall bear the responsibility of care; Where they cannot take care of them in person, they may entrust others or elderly care establishments to take care of them in accordance with the wishes of the elderly.

Article 16 Supporters shall make proper arrangements for the housing of the elderly, and shall not force the elderly to live in or move to houses with poor conditions. Children or other relatives must not encroach on the housing owned or rented by the elderly, and must not change the property rights or lease relationship without authorization. The caregiver has the obligation to maintain the housing owned by the elderly.

Article 17: Supporters have the obligation to cultivate or entrust others to cultivate the fields contracted by the elderly, and to take care of or entrust others to take care of the elderly's forests and livestock, and the proceeds belong to the elderly.

Article 18: Family members shall care about the spiritual needs of the elderly, and must not neglect or neglect the elderly. Family members who live separately from the elderly should visit or greet the elderly frequently. The employer shall, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the State, guarantee the right of the supporter to take leave for family visits.

Article 19 A supporter may not refuse to perform his or her obligation to support him on the grounds of renunciation of his right of inheritance or other reasons. If the supporter fails to perform the maintenance obligation, the elderly person has the right to demand that the supporter pay alimony. The caregiver shall not require the elderly to undertake work beyond their means.

Article 20: With the consent of the elderly, the supporters may sign an agreement on the performance of the maintenance obligation. The content of the maintenance agreement must not contravene the provisions of the law and the wishes of the elderly.

Legal basis

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1067: [Parents' Obligation to Support and Obligation to Support Children]Where parents do not perform their obligation to support, minor children or adult children who are unable to live independently have the right to demand that their parents pay child support. Parents who fail to fulfill their obligation to support their adult children, or who lack the ability to work or who have difficulties in living, have the right to demand maintenance from their adult children.

Article 1074: [Obligation to Support and Support Between Grandparents] Grandparents who can afford it have the obligation to support their minor grandchildren whose parents have died or whose parents are unable to support them.

Grandchildren who can afford it have the obligation to support their grandparents who have died or whose children are unable to support them.

Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China:

Article 261:Refusal to support an elderly or young, sick, sick person, or other person who has an obligation to support him, and the circumstances are heinous, is to be sentenced to up to five years imprisonment, short-term detention, or controlled release. This article is a specific provision for the crime of desertion.

The above is the relevant knowledge of "what are the legal provisions for supporting the elderly".

Hello dear, I am asking the legal advice substitute teacher, I am glad to answer for you! Children do not have the right to interfere with their parents' property and private property is protected by law. No one can interfere!

Even biological children have no right to interfere with the disposition of their parents' property. Article 13 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China stipulates that citizens' lawful private property shall not be infringed upon. Private property is protected by law, and no one can interfere, not even biological children, who have the right to interfere with the disposal of the property of the father and mother.

Dear, I hope mine will be helpful to you, and I wish you a happy life! 

It is the duty of parents to protect the property and person of minors from infringement, but if it is for the sake of the child, the parent has the right to interfere with the property of the child.

In accordance with the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 18: Guardians shall perform guardianship duties, protect the ward's person, property, and other lawful rights and interests, and must not dispose of the ward's property except for the ward's interests.

Guardians exercise their guardianship rights in accordance with law and are protected by law.

Where guardians do not perform guardianship duties or infringe upon the lawful rights and interests of their wards, they shall bear responsibility; Where property losses are caused to wards, compensation shall be made for the losses. People's courts may revoke guardianship qualifications on the basis of an application by relevant persons or units.

China's "General Principles of Civil Law" stipulates that "those over the age of 18 can independently carry out civil activities and are persons with full capacity for civil conduct." Citizens over the age of 16 but under the age of 18 who rely on their own labor income as their main livelihood shall be regarded as persons with full capacity for civil conduct. "You should still be studying right now, so legally you are a person with limited civil capacity.

So what your parents are doing is not illegal.

This problem seems to exist in my classmates, to put it bluntly, you are only 15 years old, and you have no economy at all**h@l%q, how can you really count your money as your own money, your parents don't let you buy it mainly because they are afraid that you will have a hot brain, buy it on impulse, and regret it later, and pay attention to "value for money" when you buy things.

Legally you are a person with limited civil capacity, and your parents are not breaking the law.

You don't have property, you're a minor.

The father has no right to interfere with the property of the child, and the lawful private property of the child is inviolable.

6. What does the Constitution say about the protection of citizens' private property?

1) The lawful private property of citizens is inviolable.

2) The State shall protect citizens' private property rights and inheritance rights in accordance with the provisions of law.

3) The State may, in accordance with the law, expropriate or expropriate the private property of citizens and compensate them for the needs of the public interest.

Refer to the Judicial Bureau of Shanghang County, Fujian Province.

If the child is an adult, you can't interfere, you can only suggest.