-
Anonymous users2024-02-06Legal Analysis: Witness qualification refers to the qualification or ability to testify in litigation activities. Anyone who knows the circumstances of the case has an obligation to testify. Persons who are physically or mentally deficient or who are too young to distinguish between right and wrong and who cannot express themselves correctly are not allowed to be witnesses.
Legal basis: Article 72 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China All units and individuals who know the circumstances of the case have the obligation to appear in court to testify. The responsible person of the relevant unit shall support the witnesses in testifying. A person who cannot express his meaning correctly cannot testify.
Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China Article 60: All persons who know the circumstances of the case have the obligation to testify. A person who is intellectually or mentally defective or young and cannot distinguish between right and wrong and cannot express himself correctly cannot be a witness.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-05Summary. Hello dear, happy to answer for you! The conditions for witnesses are set out in the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China.
According to the Act, the witness must be a natural person with civil capacity, capable of identifying facts and explaining circumstances, and not a criminal suspect, defendant, criminal defendant or person declared missing. In addition, witnesses must also have a statutory witness obligation to testify in court, to truthfully state the facts they know, not to conceal or distort facts, and not to refuse to testify or give false testimony. If a witness does not meet the above conditions, the court will not accept his or her application to testify.
Hello dear, happy to answer for you! The conditions for witnesses are set out in the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. According to the law, the witness must be a natural person with civil capacity, be able to distinguish the facts and explain the situation, and not be a criminal suspect, defendant, criminal defendant or person who has been declared missing.
In addition, witnesses must also have a statutory witness obligation, that is, to testify in court, truthfully state the facts they know, not to conceal or distort the facts, and not to refuse to testify or give false testimony. If the witness does not meet the above conditions, the court will not accept Wang Pei's application to testify. <>
Legal basis: There are clear provisions in the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China. According to article 63 of the Act, a witness is a person who is able to give facts relevant to the case.
Witnesses must meet the following conditions: first, they must be at least 18 years old; second, to be able to identify facts; The third is to be able to take the attack enough to make an explanation; Fourth, there is no criminal record of major crimes; Fifth, there are no other circumstances that would affect his testimony. In addition, according to Article 64 of the Law, a witness shall also meet one of the following conditions:
First, they have no interest in the criminal suspect or defendant; The second is that even if they have an interest, they can testify truthfully. [Big Red Flower Brother].
Witnesses must have a certain age and cognitive ability, and at the same time must not have a major criminal record or other circumstances that affect their testimony, and they must also have no beneficial relationship with the suspect or defendant who committed the crime of laughter, or even if they have an interest, they can testify truthfully. <>
-
Anonymous users2024-02-04Summary. <>
Dear, hello I am glad to answer for you: According to your situation, the specific analysis is as follows: Referring to the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law, all units and individuals who know the circumstances of the case have the obligation to appear in court to testify.
Therefore, in public security administrative punishment cases, those who have knowledge of the illegal case and have the capacity for civil conduct can be used as witnesses. Hope it helps you, <>
The conditions for witnesses are prescribed by which law.
Hello, dear I am happy to answer for you: According to your specific situation, the specific analysis is as follows: Referring to the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law, all units and individuals who know the circumstances of Sun Shou's case have the obligation to testify in court.
Therefore, in public security administrative punishment cases, those who have knowledge of the illegal case and have the capacity for civil conduct can be used as witnesses. Hope it helps you, <>
Kiss <>
Help you find and destroy the following relevant information: Article 72 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China; Witness Requirements and ObligationsAll units and individuals who know the circumstances of the case have the obligation to appear in court to testify. The responsible person of the relevant unit shall support the witnesses in testifying.
A person who cannot express his meaning correctly cannot testify. Article 85 of the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law": People's police questioning the victim or other witnesses may do so at their unit or residence; When necessary, they may also be notified to come to the public security organs to provide testimony. People's police questioning the victim or other witnesses outside the public security organs shall present their work identification.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-03Witness qualification refers to the qualification or ability to testify in litigation activities. Anyone who knows the circumstances of the case has an obligation to testify. A person who is physically or mentally handicapped or who is too young to distinguish between right and wrong and who cannot express himself correctly is a witness who is not able to bear the burden of being a witness.
Legal basis] Article 72 of the Civil Procedure Law stipulates that all units and individuals who know the circumstances of the case have the obligation to appear in court to testify. The responsible person of the relevant unit shall support the witnesses in testifying. A person who cannot express his meaning correctly cannot testify.
Article 60 of the Criminal Procedure Law stipulates that anyone who knows the circumstances of a case has the obligation to testify. Persons who are physically or mentally handicapped or who are too young to distinguish between right and wrong and who cannot express themselves correctly cannot be witnesses.
Reasons for high compensation under U.S. law:
2. The principle of reparating damages: U.S. law also adheres to the principle of reparating damages, but punitive damages (i.e., fines) can be imposed according to the degree of intent of the specific infringement, the cost of prevention and other factors. >>>More
The Trademark Law provides the following protection measures for well-known trademarks: If a trademark applied for registration for identical or similar goods is a copy, imitation or translation of a well-known trademark of another person that has not been registered in China, which is likely to cause confusion, it shall not be registered and its use shall be prohibited. If a trademark applied for registration for non-identical or dissimilar goods is a copy, imitation or translation of a well-known trademark already registered in China by another person, misleading the public and causing possible damage to the interests of the registrant of the well-known trademark, it shall not be registered and its use shall be prohibited. >>>More
Yes. The fundamental rights of our citizens.
1.The right to equality. >>>More
First of all, you calm down your mood first, you are so angry because you are sharing a house for the first time, you don't have to mind I can tell you responsibly that you are not so unlucky Only you will meet such a person and you are also a classmate, I am also a girl who graduated for two years Or share a house with my college roommate, this relationship is good, but after sharing a house Because of the difference in living habits, I am quite unhappy, and the relationship is stiff and embarrassing And 70% of the people around me who share a house like this are like this, and in the end they all change houses or rent them themselves, When we first shared a house together, we all thought that it was better to know each other and talk than to share a house with someone I didn't know, but it was wrong! I hope you consider everyone's own living habits, everyone has a different way of being born Some like to be quiet Some like to be lively Some are clean Some are sloppy and can't do things, we can't avoid some adults when we live with our families, not to mention with classmates, they are doing immoral This is also related to the quality of people's tutoring I suggest that you don't have to do so absolutely If you sue them and take this out of the matter Everyone will say that those two people are not very good and have no quality But they will say that you are too bad It's all classmates, who will be friends with you in the future, and if you make some mistakes, you have to be so serious. What do you think. >>>More
According to the provisions of the Property Law, if the property rights of adjacent relationships are infringed, the right holder can resolve them through reconciliation, mediation, arbitration, litigation and other means. >>>More