Please help me translate the English literature

Represents the problem, like possi-blessing, but does not completely lose the element of sensitivity to change.

Consider environmental concerns.

Identify the problem or attribute that can help solve it.

and identify relevant processing issues. Participant.

Arranging goals, attributes, problems, and stake holders at one level are two purposes. It provides a holistic view of the complex relationship of vessels inherent in the situation, and helps deci-tin manufacturers to assess whether the problem at each level is the same order of magnitude, so he can be more accurate with the homogeneity of the elements.

Of course not as good as a press on the path, Mr. Everest, the Footballer and hopefully get meaningful. Soccer balls and tons. Everests must be more than they are in the class of set objects.

Later we give a basic scale usage comparison. It is judged by words from equal to the limits (equal, modestly stronger, very strong, very much) corresponding to verbal judgments numerical judgments ) and compromises, these values. We have completed the dictionary of this-infancy related to a variety of issues, from individuals to companies for the public.

A level does not need to be completed, it is an element that is below the level of all elements of a property (or standard) that have no function at a given level. A hierarchy is not a traditional decision tree. Each level can represent a different problem.

One level can represent social factors and another in terms of political FAC - TOR assessment, and vice versa. Further, a decision-maker can insert or eliminate the level of making the necessary clarifications and elements of the task of prioritizing or improving the setting to focus on one or more parts of the system. Elements that have a global character can be at a higher level, and other levels of specific descriptions of the problem can be more in-depth.

Set priorities for the nature or characteristics of the criteria for comparing the program, and the hierarchy of the program itself is progressively stratified, so it makes sense to compare the elements of the hierarchy between them. Finally, in judgment a certain influence has been achieved, giving priority to all elements that have been calculated out of the hierarchy as a whole, and sometimes, with caution, unimportant elements can be considered further, because of their relatively small influence objec - conservative. Priority can be recomputed, or the rest of the judgment without changing it.

The question of representation should be thoroughly expressed as much as possible, but not so that the content of the change of sensitivity should not be completely lost;

Take into account the surrounding environmental issues;

identify the problem or attribute that will help to solve it;

and identify the issues of the relevant participants.

The objectives, characteristics, problems, and stakeholder hierarchy are arranged for two purposes. It provides an overview of the complex relationships inherent in the ship's situation; And helps to decide whether the manufacturer evaluates the problem at each level is the same order of magnitude, so he can compare the same elements as accurately.

Which of course can not be compared according to the size of Mr. Everest and hope to get any meaningful answers. Football and MT. Compared to Mount Everest, it must be in the class of prescribed objects.

Later, we give a basic scale of use to make comparisons. It consists of oral judgments from the egalitarian extremes (equal, milder, more intense, very strongly more, very much) corresponding to oral judgments that are values between numerical judgments (1, 3, 5, 7, 9) and compromises. We have completed a dictionary of the compilation of hierarchical archies relating to a variety of issues, from individuals to businesses to the public.

The hierarchy does not need to be complete, that is, an element at a certain level does not play a role in the level of all the contents of the attribute (or standard). Hierarchies are not traditional decision trees. Each level may represent a different reduction in the problem.

One level may be social factors and another political factor is evaluated in terms of social factors, and vice versa. In addition, decision-makers can insert or eliminate the level and elements of the system in which it is necessary to clarify the task of identifying priorities or salient parts or components. The content, which has a global level of delegate to attend a higher level, other specific features of the problem, on the other hand, can be developed in greater depth.

tasks that need to be prioritized by criteria, performance or functionality of alternatives to compare, and are gradually replacing their own hierarchical hierarchy so that it makes sense to compare them to a higher level in the future in relation to the various elements of their relationship. Finally, all the factors and priorities that have been given to the impact of the judgment have been calculated as a hierarchy as a whole, sometimes with care, but equally important content can be further considered, since they have a relatively small impact on the total objectivity. Priorities can be re-placed, with or without change in the remaining judgments.

Translation aside, you can't write enough abstract in this abstract? Is it an undergraduate**? - It doesn't matter, you use translation software to do the corresponding English translation, and then change the first two sentences to OK;

If it is submitted to a journal, it is not enough to pass.