Questioning the Cao Cao Tomb incident, the parties to Cao Cao s tomb are controversial

It's hard to say now, after all, there are two, but many people think that the real Cao Cao's tomb should be one of the two.

After the announcement of the confirmation of Gaoling by the Henan Provincial Bureau of Cultural Relics, it aroused great concern from all walks of life. Some scholars said that the current evidence is still difficult to support the "new theory", and some experts say that the Eastern Han Dynasty tomb is indeed a high tomb for this discovery.

Yuan Jixi, deputy dean of the School of Chinese Studies of the Chinese National University, who specializes in the study of Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, said that the evidence of "Cao Cao's tomb in Anyang" released by relevant parties is not first-hand materials, and it is not very strong evidence. Publishing information without direct evidence is contrary to the seriousness of academic research.

Yi Zhongtian, a professor at Xiamen University, Fang Beichen, a professor at the School of History and Culture of Sichuan University, and Song Jian, director of the archaeology department of the Shanghai Museum, and other well-known scholars and archaeologists of the Three Kingdoms took a calm attitude, saying that in the absence of more convincing unearthed cultural relics, this "new theory" has yet to be further proven.

On December 29, 2009, Hong Kong Wen Wei Po published an article signed "Zhang Jingwei", pointing out that from the form of epitaphs, unearthed cultural relics, and the bones in the tomb, a relatively tight logical chain has been formed, and there is no doubt that Cao Cao's tomb was discovered this time.

If the police are legitimate robbers, then these archaeologists are legitimate tomb robbers!

People have been dead for thousands of years, and they still have to dig people out, just dig them out, and they have to play with other people's bones, you can just play with bones, and said that you want to check the genealogy to find descendants, and if you find descendants, you will go to find it, and if you find it, you will smile and say to future generations: We dug up your ancestors!

In fact, it is all the fault of interests, and in the final analysis, some people do not play cards according to the rules.

What was originally an academic debate has now become a game of interests.

50 percent map.

This data is ** on the map, and the final result is subject to the latest data on the map.

I think the mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang is buried by the monk Lu Zhishen, agree with my raising of hands?

Really, in Anyang, Henan, epitaphs and bones with names have been found, and there are a lot of reports, so I'm interested in taking a look.

An ancient tomb of the Han Dynasty was discovered in Anyang, Henan Province, which is suspected to be Cao Cao's mausoleum, and the local relevant departments vigorously publicized it; However, it has also aroused many people's doubts, and a few days ago, there was a constant war of words on the Internet, with the "anti-Cao faction" and the "pro-Cao faction" fighting each other, and the academic arguments gradually evolved into mutual attacks and abuse. The topic of "Cao Cao's Tomb" was lively for a while.

At the end of 2009, officials in Anyang, Henan Province announced the discovery of Cao Cao's tomb, and a month later, the State Administration of Cultural Heritage recognized the archaeological results. However, the tomb of Cao Cao in Anyang was only considered a fraud by all walks of life. The last message is:

A few days ago, Yan Peidong, a scholar from Hebei Province who "reversed Cao Cao", made it clear to ** for the first time that the captain of the archaeological team of Cao Cao's tomb was involved in fraud, because the archaeological team dug up the empty tomb after obtaining 2.3 million yuan of excavation funds from Anyang, and it was difficult to give it to the other party.

Since the excavation of Cao Cao's tomb in Anyang, there have been endless discussions about the authenticity of Cao Cao's tomb; As a result, the academic community is divided into "pro-Cao faction" and "anti-Cao faction". After the tomb of Cao Cao in Anyang was rated as one of the top ten archaeological discoveries in 2009, the doubts about the authenticity of the tomb of Cao Cao did not disappear, and on August 21, the "National High-level Forum on the Culture of the Three Kingdoms" initiated by the main figure of the "anti-Cao faction" and scholar Ni Fangliu was held in Suzhou. 23 experts and scholars from all over the country refuted the authenticity of Cao Cao's tomb from all aspects, and finally reached a consensus:

In the process of discovery and excavation of the "Cao Cao Tomb" in Anyang, there were artificial planning and deliberate fraud.

Academically, the fact that there is a war of words over specific, low-level issues in a roughly mature discipline is a testament to the mediocrity of the academic community. But perhaps because of this, people almost assert that Cao Cao's tomb is far more than academic fraud

Since there are so many doubts, why do the local ** still characterize it as Cao Cao's tomb? What's even more outrageous is that why do you have to develop and book a 60 yuan ticket so soon**? From this point of view, Cao Cao's tomb is a renminbi issue, not only to preserve the capital, but also to generate income.

However, there is only one truth, there is no consensus without truth, and what is even more terrible is that once it is falsified, it is difficult to turn back, and the credibility of ** will be ruined.

Let's review the declaration that Sun Yingmin, deputy director of the Henan Provincial Bureau of Cultural Relics, swore in an interview with the People's ** reporter: "The excavation of Cao Cao's tomb will not be used for commercial development, nor will any commercial activities be allowed." ”

What does it matter if it's true or not, and is it that important?

We are all soy sauce makers, Amen, Cao Cao is with us.

There are different opinions, true and false, but it is generally believed to be true

For more than 1,000 years, there are seventy-two doubts about the location of Cao Cao's tomb, some outside Xuchang City, and some under the Zhanghe River.

The discovery of Cao Cao's tomb in Henan Province in 2008 confirms that the location of Cao Cao's tomb, Cao Cao's nickname, and the thin burial system he advocated are conclusive and reliable records. It is considered to be the real tomb of Cao Cao, supported by the following six major evidences:

1. The total length of the tomb is nearly 60 meters, and the shape and structure of the brick tomb are similar to the known princely tombs of the Han and Wei dynasties, which are commensurate with Cao Cao's status as the king of Wei; The tomb was not found to seal the soil, which is also consistent with the situation that Cao Cao's Shouling Tomb is recorded in the literature "because of the height as the base, and it is not sealed and not a tree".

2. The artifacts, portrait stones and other relics unearthed from the tomb have the characteristics of the Han and Wei dynasties.

3. The location of the tomb is completely consistent with the records in the literature, the unearthed Lu Qian's epitaph and other materials. According to the literature, Cao Cao died of illness in Luoyang in the first month of the twenty-fifth year of Jian'an (220 AD), and in February, the coffin was transported back to Yecheng and buried in Gaoling, which was in the "West Gate Leopard Temple". At that time, the Ximen Leopard Temple was one kilometer south of today's Zhanghe Bridge, and belonged to Fengle Town, Anfeng Township.

This tomb is just west of the Ximen Leopard Temple. In 1998, the epitaph of Lu Qian, the eleventh year of Zhao Jianwu's great servant, was unearthed in the west of Xigaoxue Village, and it was also clearly recorded that the specific location of the tomb of Emperor Wei Wu was here.

4. The literature also records that Cao Cao advocated a thin burial, and he left a "testament" before his death: "bury in time clothes" and "no hidden gold and jade treasures", which has also been confirmed in this tomb: the scale of the tomb is not small, but the decoration in the tomb is simple and simple.

Weapons, stone pillows and other texts can prove that Cao Cao usually "often used" utensils, and some jade and other ornaments should also be Cao Cao's daily wear.

5. The most conclusive evidence is the stone plaque and stone pillow engraved with the inscription "King Wu of Wei". According to the literature, Cao Cao was first named "Duke of Wei" during his lifetime, and later became "King of Wei", and was nicknamed "King Wu" after his death. The unearthed stone plaque and stone pillow are inscribed as "King Wu of Wei", which is the title of Cao Cao when he was buried.

Cao Pi was posthumously honored as "Emperor Wu", known as "Emperor Wu of Wei" in history.

6. The male bones found in the tomb were identified as being about 60 years old, which is consistent with Cao Cao's 66 years old, and should be Cao Cao's bones.