Try to compare a few arranging software!! Ace Advance!!

I prefer nuendo. Functionally, cubase has, it has it all. The cubase that Nuendo has may not necessarily have.

Nuendo is mainly used for sound mixing and post-production of film and television audio.

cubase is mainly used for arrangement, and other functions are as bad as calves.

You can tell the difference between them from the price.

Some people say that they have different styles, but I don't think so, but in fact, the difference between them is in the number of functions.

The main requirement for the computer is that you must have a good sound card, a good CPU, and too memory.

The genre is only about your people, not about the software. CUBASE is mainly used for MIDI production and audio processing. Nuendo is mainly used for film and television post-production.

The requirements for the computer are not very demanding, mainly because the system is stable and the compatibility with professional sound cards is good.

There is kung fu to compare here, it is better to try it yourself, these two can be said to be one software, you will be one, the other will be! The computer requirements upstairs are almost the same.,There's a problem with the version of the two software.,If it's cubase3,nuendo3This version can't be installed on the win7 64-bit system.,But you can use cubase5.

This is not the case with XP systems!

The style of music has nothing to do with them, the current mainstream computer 1 to 2G memory, CPU2G can run, of course, the better the computer, the more tracks, because VST eats CPU very much.

My habit is that Overture makes instruments, and when I load the VST plugin, I can make CD sounds. And then it's easy to add vocals with cooledit.

If you don't want to use such a bunch of software, consider cubase, finale singing and automatic notation? Probably not... Generally, the so-called automatic notation is connected to the computer through the MIDI keyboard, and the computer records which data is recorded in the keyboard which tone is pressed, and this data transmission and conversion is quite convenient.

If the human voice ... You can program your voice with virtual instrument software to extract the pitch characteristics of your voice, and then...

If you want to be able to play automatically, use band in a box, but this also requires some basic knowledge of music theory.

Don't know what you're talking about. What is the automatic notation of singing?

Professional notation software. Dedicated to: finale 2010....Sibelius.

If you play the score, these two are already enough.

Arranging and recording software: sonar...cubase..

These two are professional enough.

This one is really hard to find ......

I've been looking for ...... too

Hello, about your problem, I would like to correct a little.

Overture is just an arranging music notation software and doesn't have audio capabilities (it can be mid).

Cooledit is an audio software, mainly to add some audio effects or remove vocals, sonar cubase can be sequenced, audio, of course, can also be recorded, add accompaniment, etc., if there is still something you don't understand, please add.

The process of arranging music is generally written by the arranger in MIDI first, and then the corresponding scores are exported for those to be recorded, and then recorded, and those that are not recorded are directly exported, and then these audios are summarized for mixing processing, and the mixing processing is completed for mastering.

Therefore, there are several processes that need to be completed with software in the middle, such as MIDI production, notation, recording, mixing, and mastering.

There are too many software made by MIDI, and now the domestic Windows machines are generally based on Cubase, Nuendo, FL Studio, Sonar, and Logic, Digital Proformer on Mac computers, and a few are made by Pro Tools.

Notation is not negotiable, just a Sibelius is enough, recording, mixing, mastering. Now, basically from the domestic to the international, all of them are done with Pro Tools.

Compared with the CUBASE system, Nuendo adds support for audio extraction and other operations that support skin slipping. That is to say, if you want to dub the ** file in real time, it is wiser to choose nuendo. This is the main difference between cubase and nuendo.

The other tones contain the frequency function of the socks, which is basically the same as holding the socks.

First of all, the real master will never use Chinese software, all in English.

Secondly, real masters have a wealth of knowledge, because arranging music is a very tedious job, and there are a lot of theories and instruments that need to be mastered.

In the end, it is directly programmed into a song, that is not something that a master does Finally, you look for entertainment, there are a lot of such **, hehe.

and master composers. But I haven't found a cracked version of the composer on the Internet.,His trial version has all the functions but can't output.,It is recommended that you use muse.。

The above two are simple scores. If you're not out of the score, then there's a final2009 foreign software that's pretty easy to use.

If you don't want to play music, just want to compose and listen to the effect, you can consider using final2009 or the trial version of the composer master, the former effect is quite good, but it is relatively large, there is a multi-g, and the composer master is relatively small.

may well: may as well: still. Might as well.. Still is.. may just as well: