The tragedy of the commons is a translation of the tragedy of the commons

The tragedy of the commons means that people overuse public resources, which leads to the depletion of resources.

The commons as a resource or property has many owners, each of whom has the right to use it, but no right to prevent others from using it. Everyone tends to overuse, leading to a lack of resources.

Overfished forests, overfished fishery resources, and polluted rivers and air are prime examples of the "tragedy of the commons". The reason it is called a tragedy is because each side knows that resources will be depleted by overuse, but everyone feels powerless to stop the situation from continuing to deteriorate.

The tragedy of the commons is that public goods are competitively overused or appropriated because property rights are difficult to define. This concept is often used in academic fields such as regional economics and cross-border resource management.

The tragedy "is because everyone involved knows that resources will be depleted by overuse, but everyone feels powerless to stop the situation from continuing to deteriorate." And they all have the mentality of "catching a handful in time" to exacerbate the deterioration of the situation.

A classic example of the tragedy of the commons:

Over-deforestation, over-fished fisheries, and polluted rivers and air.

When there are many owners of a resource or property, each of them has the right to use the resource, but no one has the right to prevent others from using it, resulting in the overuse of the resource, which is a "tragedy of the commons". Such as overgrazing in grasslands, overfishing in the ocean, etc.

What is the tragedy of the commons? Explain carefully. Describe some of the solutions to the tragedy of the commons.

Hello, the tragedy of the commons refers to a resource management problem that occurs when multiple people share the same finite resource. Because everyone wants to get the most out of a resource, but if everyone does so, it ends up being depleted or destroyed, so that no one can get any benefit from that resource, which is the tragedy of the commons. Commons tragedies often occur in the absence of clear property rights or regulatory measures.

Because each user needs to consider his own interests, not the interests of the resource system as a whole, moral constraints alone cannot solve this problem. Therefore, the solutions to the tragedy of the commons generally include the following:1

Regulation: Clear laws and regulations can be established to protect resources and penalties for violators. For example, it is possible to limit the number of fish caught by certain fishermen or the fishing season.

2.Privatization: In some cases, privatizing resources may be better than publicization.

If someone has a resource, they will be more motivated to protect and manage it for financial gain. For example, some nature reserves have been converted into private wildlife sanctuaries, and their management and conservation have improved since privatization. 3.

Cooperation agreement: A resource sharer may make a number of cooperation agreements or contracts that clearly stipulate the rules and restrictions that need to be followed by all parties using the resource. These rules can address how often resources are used, how many of them are used, and other related behaviors.

For example, farmers can form cooperatives to share arable land resources. 4.Sheng's Nian Tangerine State Compensation:

Or other organizations can grant eco-compensation to resource users to encourage them to protect the ecological environment. For example, it could reward fishermen who protect their habitats, or provide tax incentives to businesses that reduce pollution. In short, the tragedy of the commons is a worldwide problem, and only through rational management and regulation can the sustainable use of resources and the balanced distribution of benefits be guaranteed.

The tragedy of the commons is associated with the "enclosure movement" in Britain. In England in the 15th and 16th centuries, meadows, forests, and swamps were all public land, and although the cultivated land had owners, after the crops were harvested, the fences had to be removed and opened up as public pastures. Due to the development of the British foreign market, the sheep industry has developed rapidly, so a large number of sheep have entered the public pasture.

Soon, the land began to degrade, and the "tragedy of the commons" appeared. As a result, some aristocrats illegally acquired land through violent means, and began to fence off public land for themselves, which is the notorious "enclosure movement" that we learn about in history books. The "enclosure movement" deprived large numbers of farmers and herders their subsistence land, and the history books called the bloody "sheep cannibalism" incident.

But it is not mentioned in the book: after the throes of the "enclosure movement", the British were surprised to find that the pastures had improved, and the British as a whole had increased their income. As a result of the establishment of land titles, the land has been changed from public land to private domain, and the owner has managed the land more efficiently, and the landowner will do his best to maintain the quality of the pasture for the long-term benefit.

At the same time, after the land annexation, the production unit of the household unit evolved into large-scale assembly line production, and the labor efficiency was greatly improved. It was from the "enclosure movement" that Britain gradually developed into an empire on which the sun never sets.