After believing in materialism, I seem to have lost a little emotion? 20

The world is not created by materialism. You have to remember.

Materialism is equivalent to human domestication of animals. It is with the so-called external objective conditions. To tame yourself and adapt to objectivity.

Personally, I prefer idealism, idealism also needs a fulcrum, but what is that fulcrum, you yourself have the right to choose, if this fulcrum does not exist in any objectivity, then in your own thoughts, it still exists, in creativity can be distinguished very clearly, completely two kinds of reverse ism,

Doubt everything; I'm not a Marxist;

Karl marx.

You believe in Him because you don't know Him yet, and when you really believe, you won't have a clear sense of His existence, let alone be convinced.

When you have just realized that you have gotten rid of some low-level interests, of course, it is not thorough, comprehensive, and it is not enough to build high-level interests, and there is definitely a sense of loss.

Of course, for most people, they can't get a glimpse of the real high-end fun in their lifetime.

Norman Bethune's high-class taste, can you feel that joy?

Don't believe in materialism too much.

Philosophical things can only be achieved in idealism.

There is no answer to the path of materialism.

In the end, the only way to do this is to resort to idealism.

Most of the great philosophers in history came up with new ideas because of idealism.

New categories and new horizons have come out.

Well, I also think that this world cannot be without idealism.

If you are too materialistic, you will be utilitarian, empty, and feel too small.

Although in most cases it is necessary to acknowledge the objectivity of the world, but in the heart those who are confident, strong ... Or embodies idealism.

The two probably coexist. (purely personal opinion).

They say that the shallowest person looks at the mountain as a mountain and the water as water.

People with a little knowledge see that mountains are not mountains, and water is not water.

Those who have attained the Tao see the mountains as mountains, and the water as water ......

Maybe that's the reason, is philosophy really used to make people miserable? Hehe.

You're just seeing a wider field of vision and seeing things you didn't see before.

Historically, even the most materialistic scientists have become idealists when they go to the back

At present, no human beings have seen aliens, but they can be seen in film and television works. Their appearance is all imaginary, but this imagination comes from the operation of the brain, the brain is material, without the brain, there would be no image of aliens. The imagination of aliens in the brain, in addition to having the brain as a material basis, also requires experience.

Experience is the understanding of human beings, which extends to the imagination of aliens, thinking that their brains must be bigger, otherwise how could they come to the earth, so that the heads of aliens are particularly large, their facial features, limbs, and traces of human mammals, although this imagination comes from mental activities, but it should be based on the creator's cognition of humans and mammals, so it is still in line with the existing material, after the concept of consciousness.

Materialism has never believed that what cannot be seen does not exist, but it is certain that what cannot be seen cannot be felt with the eyes, and that the unheard sounds cannot be felt with the ears, unless an auxiliary tool is used, and the production of this auxiliary tool is in accordance with the laws of physics and chemistry, which cannot be imagined by the genius out of thin air. If idealism is correct, then, babies can be scientists, they don't need to go through brain development, they don't need to receive information, they can accumulate experience, they can generate any ideas out of thin air, and most importantly, these ideas can still solve problems, such as guiding those stupid materialists to invent some high-end devices, such as how much will a certain ** ticket rise tomorrow, and what is the house price the day after tomorrow? Is this possible?

Communitarianism must be realized, and everyone must become a materialist. in order to live in a new era of infinite beauty. There is much help for the righteous, but little help for the unjust. The avenue is not subject to human will. If a person does good, may God bless him.

Don't be afraid, there should be no ghosts, the reason is very simple, have any of the people present seen ghosts with their own eyes? What does a ghost look like? All the people in the world, I dare say, have not seen a real ghost.

I believe that people with ghosts have never seen ghosts with their own eyes, and the images of ghosts in the film are all imaginary. If ghosts do exist, they only exist in the human brain.

If only ghosts really existed, then after we die, we will still have consciousness, floating in this reluctant world, it is better than nothing.

As for those who are already dead, all pain is gone. Why do you still cry? So, even if you hear someone crying, it's definitely not a ghost, because there are no sad ghosts at all, only sad people.

Either way, it's a good thing, so take it easy.

Wind? Rain? Or is it the noise of the audio-visual?

The suburbs are complex, and it was cold during the Spring Festival, so it is estimated that the air is not very circulating, and it is possible to resonate or something.

And when you come home with fog, it may be that you cry too much, and your eyes are blinded by tears, which will affect your observation and perception. 、by the way: There are absolutely no ghosts!!

It's not called a ghost, it's a creature, some things are really indescribable, but there's no need to be afraid, a brother is right, if there is a ghost, you will also be a ghost after you die, who is afraid of whom.

I don't think there's a ghost! I guessed! I still hope that there are ghosts, and if there are ghosts, I won't be afraid of death, and I'm not old, and when I die, I'll be asleep forever like I didn't dream, and you can investigate it, and if there are really ghosts, tell me, I'm not afraid of anything, in fact, there's nothing to be afraid of, and if you want to have a ghost, you're a ghost when you're dead, and who's afraid of whom.

Probably, it's not that the latest thought that the so-called ghost [the original text says that it is the soul] is an energy field with the human body as the carrier, after death, there is still a certain amount of energy, and the soul can exist for a while, the old beauties have done experiments at the ** case site, bringing cats and dogs in, they are all barking at a place, which happens to be the place where the deceased was killed, which may not explain anything, but at least it can't say anything, I personally think that this explanation seems to work, and it does not violate materialism, I don't remember it very clearly, 8 Sorry.

Forget the word ghost.

You may just be talking about an unknown creature in science, and people are always afraid of the unknown. What is a ghost? To put it bluntly, it's just a product of the unknown + the fear of humanity. Maybe he's still afraid of you, even though you're afraid of him. Hehe.

You're amazing! Classic! Science!

Believe in science, there must be no ghosts in this world, maybe someone is playing a prank.

Do you yourself believe in ghosts? We are all young people in the new society of the 21st century, how can we believe in superstition! Personally, I think that's just your illusion. Or maybe your grandmother's death hit you too hard, so you want to think about ghosts and gods.

It is said that there are no ghosts in the world, and there may be ghosts. I think.

Already. Again. Progressive affirmative diptych statements.

Neither. The number of pants is not, either. Progressive negative diptych statements.

Therefore, the above sentence makes a logical mistake of affirmation and denial, but not progressive.

1 We don't all believe in materialism; Why we should believe in materialism is the same as why we should believe in idealism. People of different faiths preach different faiths. Our country is a socialist country that inherits Marxism, and what it accepts is materialism, so the official advocates believing in materialism.

So it's this country that argues that we should believe in materialism, but not all of us believe in materialism, and not we all believe in materialism, so there is no question of why we should believe in materialism.

2 There are many kinds of dialectics. Dialectics as a doctrine is inherently flawless, because it is self-provable. It can only be said that it is flawed in some ways.

It can only be said that it is flawed from a concrete point of view. It's a matter of frames of reference. From the point of view that nothing is perfect, any doctrine is flawed, and it does not matter if there is no flaw, it is not a question of whether there is a flaw, but a question of what or nothing is flawed.

3 First of all, science does not mean that there are no contradictions and that the system is complete. Because science is also full of internal contradictions and the system is not yet complete. For example, Darwin's theory of evolution, Einstein's theory of relativity, etc., are not uncontroversial and indisputable, and the system is still expanding.

Secondly, only some people call philosophy a science.

It's a matter of defining concepts and looking at things from a perspective. It's a matter of standards. For example, what science is and what completeness is. These concepts are ambiguous and relative. The concepts themselves have different meanings for different people.

You think that the philosophers' views are not unified and full of internal contradictions, that is, the philosophical system constructed by various famous philosophical views and speeches is incomplete and cannot be called scientific. This does not mean that they think that these systems are incomplete, that they think that the philosophers are not unified in their views, full of internal contradictions, and that the philosophical system constructed by various famous philosophical views and opinions is not complete, so philosophy cannot be called science. It doesn't mean that they think the situation is as you described, it doesn't mean that they think yours "because ......So ......"Founded.

To sum up, truth is relative. Your point of view is also relatively correct.

You ask a good question, which means that your reason is on the open.

First of all, I will give a simple answer to three questions: 1. The materialism you know is one-sided, 2. The dialectics you know is empty, and 3. The philosophers you know have not developed their ideas to the end, so the philosophy you study is not completely scientific.

Secondly, analyze these questions:

1. Materialism believes that matter is the origin of the world, and this definition is one-sided, because it ignores the spatial factor, that is, the greatest possibility of the existence and movement of matter, thus creating a huge hole in the connotation. The origin of the world should be the transformation of energy in time and space. If the original question is wrong, then the whole system of materialism is crooked.

Thus, the dialectic based on this can be imagined how one-sided and empty it is, and the arguments have become sophistries back and forth. What should be stated here is that to say that materialism is one-sided is not the same as to show that idealism is correct. The explanation of the truth of the world is not the two isms divided by previous philosophies, but the spirit contained in the doctrine of isms, no matter what the isms, must scientifically and holographically reflect the whole world, including the forms of material existence, movement and interaction.

This is Connection.

2. As a transcendence and correction of previous philosophies, the theory of connection between the development of natural sciences clarifies the most critical concepts in the cognitive world, and the established system can be used as the general unification of philosophy. The connection and elaboration of ultimate rationality naturally eliminate internal contradictions. The perfect historical spirit expounded reflects the development trend of mankind's continuous progress and perfection.

Read the connection and all your questions will get scientific and accurate answers. It is easy to read the connection, and to read other doctrines.

The worldview of the connection developed by the natural sciences inherits the nature of the natural sciences, and it can be called science naturally.

Answer: 1 This is a real society, we have to grow up in a real society, we can have idealistic thoughts, but we can only think, because he is not good in this circle, and it cannot be explained by scientific progress. Therefore, we can only solve the status quo by being materialistic, seeking truth from facts, and looking at things.

2. Dialectics, he is a universal formula, no matter what we do, we can use it, that is, to solve one thing in a correct way. It can be materialistic, it can be idealistic. But it is all about correct materialist dialectic!

There is no one who is right, these two are philosophical questions, not practical ones. Our definition of whether it is right or wrong is whether it is reasonable or not, whether it conforms to the usual logic, and from this point of view, whether materialism or idealism is explained by the channel principle, there is no right or wrong.

Materialism is correct, reality, idealism is superstition, and it is not shallow to harm people.

First of all, no one can prove that materialism and idealism are right and wrong, although some people believe that matter exists objectively, but no one can prove this, for subjective idealism, no one can prove that the universe that belongs to them after death does not exist, for objective idealism, no one can prove that God is fictional, and even many supernatural events cannot be explained by science, so why can't there be a God. I don't think it's right about materialism, it's just that it's officially right.

There is no one right or wrong. Although the materialist dialectic is now more advocated, with the change of people's consciousness, truth may become a fallacy, and a fallacy may become the truth. Just because something hasn't been discovered doesn't mean it doesn't have it, that's it!