-
Liu Bang's words, you have to always highlight one important point, that is, it is Liu Bang who succeeds in the end.
The winner is king, and the loser is the loser. This is the law of history. It's important to keep this in mind.
Then, ask the other party to highlight Xiang Yu's weaknesses and shortcomings and show Liu Bang's advantages. Because Xiang Yu has military advantages, the outstanding disadvantage is that he failed politically and did not know how to use people. At this time, it is necessary to compare with Liu Bang.
Xiang Yu's invincibility on the battlefield is politically naïve and even stupid. Killed prisoners of war, abandoned Guanzhong, missed the state of Chu, exiled Emperor Yi, and established himself as a king and lost all the people's hearts. (Note that the people's desire is the key to victory, and this point must be dismantled to kill the prisoners and chase the righteous emperor.) )
The more prominent performance is the employment of Liu Bang's subordinates, Xiao He, Zhang Liang, Han Xin, Peng Yue, and Yingbu, who have different backgrounds, but can give full play to their strengths. And Xiang Yu can't even use a Fan Zeng, Xiang Yu and Liu Bang form a stark contrast, and then, in Liu Bang's character and before his success, his bad deeds and filial piety when he was a pavilion chief will definitely be mentioned by the other party.
At this time, you want to highlight the subtleties and righteousness, that is, you keep buttoning Liu Bang's big hats, downplaying the shortcomings of his vertical drafts, and you can also use this to highlight its advantages. That is, such a person has the ambition of an emperor. Another point is that being able to bend and stretch, avoiding its edge and maintaining obscurity, this is the road to success.
-
"Xiaoxiong" means that there is a goal, the means are very good, and it mostly refers to a person who will do whatever it takes to achieve the goal. "Hero" means 1, refers to a person who is brave and brave. 2. Refers to a person with heroic qualities. 3. Selflessness, selflessness, and selflessness, with their own principles.
In this way, Xiang Yu is indeed a hero, but a tragic hero. In my impression, he treats his subordinates well and loves well, and he once defeated 600,000 allied troops with 30,000 and was brave. However, he was also jealous and hateful, killed Qin II, burned Afang Palace, and all the Qin Dynasty related to him wanted to destroy, Hongmen Yan was arrogant and tender, and did not kill Liu Bang, and his only adviser Fan Zeng did not listen to the persuasion twice.
He only cares about what he cares about, only hates what he hates, does not analyze according to the actual situation, only loses once, can't accept it, commits suicide, how sad, he just feels sympathy for him, how good it is if he is born as a general, he is not suitable to be a leader.
After Liu Bang entered the customs, he made three chapters of the law, bought the hearts of the people, grovelled at the Hongmen banquet to coax Xiang Yu, and threw his children in the battle of Pengcheng to flee for his life, and his subordinates Zhang Liang, Xiao He, Han Xin, Fan Hao and other capable people, knew how to make good use of them, and defeated more than 60 times in a row, the more frustrated the more courageous, I really admired Liu Bang, the gangsters in the village were sitting on the world, and one or two sentences could not be clear.
-
I think that first of all, the pros and cons should each give a definition of the word "hero" in their favor. (This is where aggressive questions are raised).
1. In the definition of the opponent's hero, if there is "a hero, it refers to a person who can be brave." Then the other party will mention the deeds of killing the white snake, punishing the violent Qin, and the way of employing people. You can propose:
May I ask the other party's defense friend, do you actually believe that there is really a white snake spirit in this world? How can this chasing after the wind and shadows be used as proof. "May I ask the opponent's defense friend, who was the first to stand up, and who contributed more in the process?
Don't you hear about the ruins of the year? said that Liu Bang contributed a lot, it was because you only looked at the results and ignored the most critical process of --- and tyrannizing Qin.
Because you are a three-discerning person, the previous opponent's first argument will mention such as the definition of a hero, Liu Bang's excellent deeds, etc., in the opening question, and your rebuttal questions can be obtained from it.
2. Analyze character. "Heroes originally refer to people who are of excellent quality, outstanding in martial arts, selfless and selfless, and admirable. ”
You can ask, Xiang Yu went to the battlefield and said to the generals around him, brothers, follow me! And Liu Bang will only say, everyone rush.
Who is more selfless and selfless in comparison? In order to flee for his life, Liu Bang decisively left his wife and children behind, this is the behavior of a beast, how can the opponent's defense friend explain? May I ask the other party's defense friend, when the world mentions Xiang Yu, which one does not regret and praise, and it seems that more people recognize Liu Bang as just a gangster, how can this be explained?
After all, the eyes of the masses are bright!
That's pretty much it. I hope others will continue to add to it!
-
In such a debate competition, if you are Xiang Yu, as long as the other party prepares carefully, you will definitely lose. There are too many loopholes to say that Xiang Yu is a hero, and there are too many historical facts that can be brought out. The traditional view that Xiang Yu is a hero can be refuted by presenting evidence and historical facts.
-
Personally, I think Xiang Yu is a hero, just like Li Qingzhao said in his poem, "Life is a hero, and death is also a ghost." So far, I think of Xiang Yu and refuse to cross Jiangdong. ”
-
Xiang Yu can be called a hero, but he is not a hero.
Liu Bang can be regarded as a hero, but from the perspective of all aspects of his style, he is not a hero.
But only heroes can become emperors. Haojie can only dominate one side.
Liu Bangshen is proficient in employing people, with high dominance, able to endure, and the overall view of the strong Xiang Yu is a samurai, although the force is high, arrogant, and the dominance is low, he can't bear it, and he has no overall view.
Yes. At the end of the Qin Dynasty, Xiang Liang, the son of Xiang Yan, the general of the old Chu State, one of the anti-Qin forces at that time, accepted Fan Zeng's suggestion, found Xiong Xin, the grandson of King Huai of Chu, among the people, and established Xiong Xin as the king of Chu. After Xiang Liang was killed in the Battle of Dingtao, King Huai moved from Xutai (now northeast of Lingyi, Jiangsu) to Pengcheng (now Xuzhou, Jiangsu), where he reused Song Yi and Liu Bang to contain Xiang Liang's nephew Xiang Yu, and made the "Huaiwang Covenant", and the generals who first attacked Xianyang, the capital of Qin, would be crowned King of Guanzhong. >>>More
The main reason is that Tai Shigong likes Xiang Yu more. Sima Qian likes the kind of person who has a heroic spirit, Xiang Yu is definitely a big hero, whether it is his character or ability, or the last arrogance, it reflects his heroic nature. Liu Bang, on the other hand, is more ruffian, he is indeed smart and good at employing people, and he is also the kind of person who can improve his mistakes and admonishment, but his image does not seem to be heroic enough. >>>More
In fact, Liu Bang took advantage of Xiang Yu's army to quell the rebellion of Qi in the east, and the rear was empty, so he had an opportunity to kill all the way. And basically, Xiang Yu at that time was equivalent to one as a hundred.
I look at Xiang Yu. —Reflections on reading "Historical Records". >>>More