Is it a 3690 or 4850?

There is no suspense that it is the top 4850.

But the 4850 consumes a lot of power and dissipates a lot of heat.

The running score and the game are both 4850 fierce.

If you run games, they are all NV fierce, but the 4850 can surpass NV's 9800GTX, and the game effect is second only to GTX260 and GTX280

Do you know what the laggard generation does on the A-card? It is to lag behind in all respects, and the standard is naturally running scores and games.

If you don't consider **, you don't have to choose 4850 to choose 3690? This can be a joke.

GraphicsCore Radeon HD 3690

Core codename RV670

The graphics card core clock speed is 702MHz

The memory frequency is 1692MHz

GraphicsMemory 256MB

The memory bit width is 128 bits

The core process of the graphics card is 55 nm.

RAMDAC frequency 400MHz

GraphicsMemory 256MB

320 stream processing units.

Maximum resolution 2560 1600

Supports 3D API DirectX, Shader Model, OpenGL

Doka technology CrossFire

Display chip model Radeon HD 4850

Display chip series: ATI Radeon HD 4850, video memory capacity (MB): 512, video memory bit width (bit), 256, video memory frequency (MHz): 1986

Core clock speed (MHz) 625

Core codename RV770

The chip manufacturing process is 55nm

Stream processing unit 800

Support the maximum resolution of 2560*1600

Multi-card technology CrossFireX

Supports 3D API DirectX, Shader Model, OpenGL

No matter from the display core frequency, video memory capacity, number of stream processors, video memory bit width 3690.

4850 fierce.

But as an ordinary user, there is no need to change 4850, those scores are all put on display.

The real effect improvement is not much.

3650<3690<3850<3870<4850<4870 4850 is better than NV's 9800GTX The performance of products in different eras is far worse

4850 But your CPU should also be very good, or it won't work.

Not a grade and not a price point, the 4850 and 3690 are like a 4-core and single-core CPU comparison.

In short, the 4850 is a lot higher than the 5670 in gaming performance.

For 1440*900 resolution, in the actual game.

Call of Duty 5 has a 30% gap.

Call of Duty 6 has a 20% gap, with 4850 being stronger.

In Far Cry2 it is basically the same, there is no gap.

There is a 20% gap in the hawk, 4850 strong.

There is a 30% gap in Crysis, 4850 strong.

But in terms of scores, 3DVANTAGE has a 35% difference.

SP's 5670 is at most the level of the G92 core 9600GT that year, mainly from the 5750, not only reduces 80SP but also only 8 ROPs, so the performance is not as good as 4830

2. According to the previous evaluation, the performance of 5670 should only be equivalent to 75% of that of 4850, and the above is based on the public version.

3. In fact, it is still very cost-effective to buy 5750 on the current **, the performance is about 10% stronger than 4850, the power consumption is low, and the first-line brands like Lanbao and Dilan are more than 800 yuan.

4850 is obviously stronger than 5670. So you put it this way, the 5750 and the 4850 have the same performance.

Although it is said, the full score of 4850 running 3DMark06 is 13000 points; The full score of 5670 is 11000 points, which is not too big, but the actual performance is a lot worse. The score is a reference, and it really depends on whether it works or not, and practice is the key.

5670 to play Crysis if the screen is extremely high, you can't play it, but 4850 is fine. The full score of 4830 is also 11000 points, but the actual performance is also stronger than 5670. One of the most critical weaknesses of the 5670 is that the bit width is 128bit, which makes it suffer a lot.

There should be,Now there is almost no stock on the marketHD4850,Because it has been discontinued,Need to shop online,This actually depends on personal needs,Don't blindly pursue how high the performance is,It's good to be enough for yourself,Actually,HD5670 can meet the needs of most games,So I recommend not to change it better,If you really want to buy,I recommend sapphire hd4850 overseas version,Maybe now** is relatively high,Measure it yourself,There are many brand choices,Don't buy Shuangmin or the like, Hope it helps.

How much stronger do you say the 4850 beats the NV9800 series?

3650, 3690 performance higher than 86gts, not a lot 88gs 96gso higher than 3850, lower than 387096gt, 88gt higher than 3870

The 4850 rival is the 98GTX, and the 98GTX is slightly better than the 48504870, which is basically the same as the GT260.

I'm arranging it for you by pressing **.

It's the same as these two** currently the same** A card is good.

In particular, the low-break and high-end mid-range are not clear (almost...)

Low-end, mid-range, high-end: 8500gt, 8600gt, 9600gs, 9600gt, 9800gtx+ gtx260

First of all, GTS250, not GTX!

What graphics card to change to look at your motherboard! Generally, it is a board with a card A! N board with n card! This is more stable! There won't be some incompatibility issues!

Compared to the 4850 and GTS250, they have their own characteristics! 4850As a hot product of A card now, it continues the various characteristics of the A card itself, such as their outstanding rendering ability, full-screen anti-aliasing is their killer feature, the picture is gorgeous, and it is also supportive, for supported games, A card can improve their picture quality to a new level!

And GTS250 is also a graphics card with a good cost performance now! The strength of the N card is mainly smoothness! It can achieve stable smoothness when playing games, and the physx physics acceleration makes the games that support it run smoothly!

Of course, the play of these two features must be supported by games, and there are still relatively few games on the market that support both technologies! If the landlord buys a graphics card for these two technologies, it is not necessary! Just to introduce you!

I've seen a lot of reviews, and the strength of these two graphics cards is still very close! There are advantages in the comparison of various games, but overall the 4850 still has a slight upper hand, especially after turning on full-screen anti-aliasing, it will show a little stronger strength than the GTS250!

Now in terms of **, the GTS250 seems to be slightly cheaper than the 4850, and the whole is about the same! The landlord might as well look at his motherboard, if it is an N board, buy GTS250, if it is a A board, buy 4850, so that the stability and compatibility will be better!

Hope it helps!

Only the CTS250 does not have the GTX250

The GTS250 is a vest product of the 9800GTX+.

GTS250 and HD4850 are the same graphics cards.

According to some manufacturers, it is impossible to compare the non-public version of the graphics card.

If it's all public version.

The GTS250 is slightly more powerful than the HD4850

It can't be simply calculated, the architecture efficiency of the stream processor of the A card and the N card is completely different, and it is not a group of 5 that can be punished by five.

The performance of these two graphics cards is about the same, and the advertised ones are not credible, so you can buy them to your liking.

When it comes to game performance or overall performance, of course, it is 9800GTX+ strong, because his physical processing is indeed better than that of A card, and when A card plays games, it will lose 1 instant frame rate when encountering physical effects such as ** debris flying out, water splashing, glass explosion, etc., because A card is not supported by physical technology.

And the new driver of the N card is basically optimized for a lot of 3D game masterpieces, to achieve the effect of increasing the number of frames, like my single card 9600GT after playing the latest driver after playing the Crysis Warhead The highest effect can reach 26 frames of smooth effect, now many game companies develop games that sell N card advertisements, I believe that many people will see the logo of the N card at the beginning of the game when playing 3D games, so, it is undoubtedly good for N card to play games.

But for single 1 performance,It's the processing of graphics,It's a card's 4850 good,800 stream processors are fully experienced,Even if you can't open all the special effects in the game,But it's the strength of a card in terms of anti-aliasing,Or do 3D,3D graphics processing software,Work on graphics card requirements,Need to use a card。

Hehe, you have to look carefully, the online reviews emphasize different points, so you can artificially say that a certain is strong.

Let me explain to you, it is better to use 9800GTX to play games, there is no need to dispute, but the advantage of 4850 lies in its design process advantages, using less than 50% of the processing structure to complete 80% of the performance of 9800GTX, so it has an overall advantage in the size, power consumption, heat and cost of the chip.

If you want better performance, use the 9800GTX, and people who use high-end graphics cards should not care about saving a little electricity bill.

9800GTX+ 4850 are both 55nm, how can there be 45nm?

Two and a half pounds and eight taels.

9800GTX+ supports physical acceleration,4850 high AA has a bit of an advantage, buy whichever you like,If it's me,I'll buy 9800GTX+,Because 9800GTX+ is generally better than 4850。。。

To look at the graphics card, you need to look at the overall parameters.

Is a 1G graphics card necessarily better than 512M?

Just like the stream processing unit, it is used to fill in the map, and the difference cannot be distinguished by the naked eye when playing games or drawing, the most important thing about the graphics card is actually bit width, video memory bandwidth, core frequency, etc.

Although the bit width of the 7750 is 128 bits, it makes up for the lack in terms of core frequency and memory bandwidth.

The performance is better than the 4850.

The 7750 is stronger than the 4850, the architecture is different, the number of stream processors cannot be directly compared, and the power consumption of the 7750 is much lower than that of the 4850.

It's definitely a 4850 strong.

4850 has 512M video memory, is the RV770 core, better than the 9400GT and the 9400GT is only 256M or even less, only the G94 core can also be seen from the **, 4850 is obviously more expensive than the 9400GT.

That's the question I asked.

Let's put it this way, you're asking which is more valuable, gold or copper, isn't it?