What principles should be followed in the evaluation of historical events?

It was a reform carried out by the Qing ** in order to save his rule.

<>1. The principle of comprehensiveness: the evaluation of historical events should have a two-point view, and conduct a comprehensive evaluation from the aspects of positivity and negativity, subjective motivation and objective effect;

2. The principle of development and long-term: the evaluation of historical events should be evaluated from the perspective of the development of the entire human history, from the perspective of whether it conforms to the trend of historical progress and whether it reflects the inevitable trend of historical development;

3. The principle of mainstreamness: In the evaluation of historical events, it is necessary to distinguish between the mainstream and tributaries of historical events, the difference between political activities and personal life, and cannot be partial and comprehensive, and personal moral standards cannot be used to replace the standards of historical progress;

4. The principle of moderation: the evaluation of historical events should not be unconventional, should not contradict mainstream academic views, and should not violate the standards of good and evil of ordinary people;

5. The principle of practice: The evaluation of historical events should be evaluated from the perspectives of whether they are conducive to social progress and the development of productive forces, as well as the quality of their practical effects and their role in the development of social history.

<> evaluation of historical events should follow the following principles:

1. The principle of comprehensiveness: the evaluation of historical events should have a two-point view, and conduct a comprehensive evaluation from the aspects of positivity and negativity, subjective motivation and objective effect;

2. The principle of development and long-term: the evaluation of historical events should be evaluated from the perspective of the development of the entire human history, from the perspective of whether it conforms to the trend of historical progress and whether it reflects the inevitable trend of historical development;

3. The principle of mainstreamness: In the evaluation of historical events, it is necessary to distinguish between the mainstream and tributaries of historical events, the difference between political activities and personal life, and cannot be partial and comprehensive, and personal moral standards cannot be used to replace the standards of historical progress;

4. The principle of moderation: the evaluation of historical events should not be unconventional, should not contradict mainstream academic views, and should not violate the standards of good and evil of ordinary people;

5. The principle of practice: The evaluation of historical events should be evaluated from the perspectives of whether they are conducive to social progress and the development of productive forces, as well as the quality of their practical effects and the role they play in the historical development of the society.

Hello. I think there are three criteria for evaluating historical events, which are just for your reference.

1. Persist in taking whether or not to promote the development of productive forces as the primary criterion.

Productive forces are the ultimate driving force for historical development, an important part of history, and the most fundamental criterion for evaluating historical phenomena.

In the history of malaise, all people and things that promote the development of productive forces and human society have been progressive.

On the contrary, it is negative and backward.

2. Adhere to the criterion of unifying the historical viewpoint with the dialectical viewpoint.

There are two points of view to be applied.

First, we must use the historical viewpoint to examine and evaluate the historical events, figures, and viewpoints under the historical conditions of the time, and we cannot be harsh on the ancients from our current perspective; On the other hand, it is necessary to use a dialectical viewpoint to comprehensively and divide into two ways to examine and correct the malpractices, analyze the objects of evaluation, and clearly explain the positive and negative natures, progressiveness, and backwardness of the objects of evaluation.

3. Adhere to the correct method as the standard.

Drawing from history and combining history with theory is the basic principle and method for studying and researching history.

In evaluating historical events, we must not come from groundlessness, let alone make subjective assumptions, and all conclusions must be based on facts, and only by adhering to the spirit of not only books, not only superiors, and not only teachers can we draw fair, objective, and reasonable conclusions.

To correctly evaluate historical events, it is necessary to apply the materialist view of history to dialectical analysis, and to look at ancient history from the perspective of antiquity, and to have logical thinking.

1. Dialectical analysis using the materialist view of history.

Evaluating history without philosophical thought is equivalent to not reading a book, and it is necessary to have materialism, not to say whatever you say, otherwise it will become idealism.

Therefore, it is necessary to analyze history objectively and comprehensively according to the materialist view of history, and not to have biased and extreme ideas.

2. Ancient history from the perspective of antiquity.

Instead of looking at ancient history from the current development perspective, the nature and system of ancient homicide and modern homicide are different, there is no comparison, and modern legal and moral values cannot be used to measure ancient history.

There were no mobile phones in ancient times, but there are in modern times, so it is impossible to compare, look at those bloody dramas, time-traveling dramas, which are not in line with history.

3. Have logical thinking.

Use history to argue events, and use logical thinking to think about problems, instead of prejudice and hatred of this dynasty, you will lose your mind and smear a historical dynasty, so you will never find the truth of history if you do not call on your prejudices and extremist ideas to affect your ability to judge and judge history.

In a class society, historical figures are not only the figures of a certain era, but also the representatives of a certain class, so they have a historical and class character, and are inevitably constrained by historical conditions and class status. Therefore, in evaluating historical figures, we must adhere to two basic principles: First, the attitude of historical materialism.

In evaluating historical figures, it is necessary to proceed from the historical reality of their localities and conduct a comprehensive analysis of specific history in the light of the history of the time. Second, the method of class analysis. In evaluating historical figures, it is also necessary to examine them in connection with the class status to which they belong, and to make a concrete analysis of their economic, political, ideological, and cultural conditions in the course of specific historical development.