Everyone thinks that which brand of digital camera is the best cost effective 50

The Nikon CoolPix 7600 (the most inexpensive 700W pixel camera with excellent imaging) is a bit of a luxury to position the Nikon CoolPix 7600 with 7.1 million effective pixels as an entry-level camera, but it's a beginner-friendly entry-level portable DC. If you just want to play digital and not learn photography, then this one is enough.

The Nikon CoolPix 7600 offers ultra-high photographic resolution that is unmatched by any other entry-level digital camera. In addition, the advantages of the 3x zoom Nikkor ED lens, combined with the ultra-low dispersion lens, can minimize chromatic aberration, bringing sharp and clear images, and night scenes are very beautiful and delicate.

The CoolPix 7600 is easy to operate, has accurate focusing, and has up to 16 scene modes. Convenient, fast and worry-free, it is very suitable for the rhythm of modern life. The price of about 2,000 yuan should be acceptable to students.

Canona710 is highly recommended

It's the most cost-effective machine ever that I think Canon has ever come out of, with 7.4 million pixels of 6x optical zoom and optical image stabilization This upgrade finally makes up for the shortcomings of the A700's high optical zoom without image stabilization. This is also the first time that Canon has added stabilization to the A-series. Zol is now 2350** and it's really not expensive.

I can say that I am really satisfied with this function.

Speaking of cost performance,I still think Samsung's cost performance is the highest,And it's very suitable for home use,i6 and NV3 are very suitable for the requirements of the ratio,Simple operation,And imaging is also good,Also with***,mp4 and other more** functions,Both have camera functions,NV3There is also an e-reading function,You can read e-books,NV3** is higher than i6,But there are also more functions。

Samsung S600, although it is a little old, but it is good to use.

The two biggest brands of digital cameras are Canon and Sony, but mainly because their SLRs are good, globally, these Japanese digital camera manufacturers are Panasonic No. 1 and Fujifilm No. 2 (ordinary household products).

There are a lot of advertisements for Canon, whether it is TV or newspapers, and even many people believe that there are many Canon gunmen on the Internet, who specialize in fooling people into buying Canon.

Nikon's SLR has an excellent reputation and good workmanship, but it does not invest much in ordinary home cameras and does not have many products.

Panasonic's quality is the best, all made in Japan, Leica lenses, you can rest assured that you can use one for many years, about you can go to the 315 Consumer Association to check, Panasonic's complaints, very few repairs.

Fujifilm is recognized as the most cost-effective, but the workmanship is correspondingly poor, often bringing problems such as the battery is not very good, the screen is average, and the fuselage is easy to heat up, of course, not all machines have.

As for Olympus, it is good at rugged cameras, Casio, it is good at high-speed continuous shooting, Kodak, the most vivid colors, Sony, stylish styling, Samsung and Fujifilm are about the same, cost-effective, the workmanship is very average, the low-end camera Patriot is about the same as Samsung, BenQ is the worst, but it is also the cheapest, Ricoh, Pentax, etc. don't have to think about it, there is too little after-sales.

Let's take a look at your requirements. Within two thousand, if you ask for manual, the card Fuji F305, Samsung WB1000 Canon, etc. are around two thousand, Panasonic ZS7, ZS5, ZS3, FX580 Fuji F85, F200 is around 1700, and Kodak Z950, Canon SX120, etc., there are many choices.

If you don't plan to buy it to learn photography (in the future, DSLR), then the Nikon S6000, Canon IXUS 105, Sony W350, Panasonic FH3, Casio Z2000 and many more can meet the requirements of the home (wide-angle, fully automatic, ultra-thin, camera function).

Recommend Panasonic FP8, beautiful, practical and cheap, because Panasonic does not care about the cost to use this machine to earn reputation.

FP8 has a wide angle, a relatively large aperture, and a high-cost ED lens that is rare in its kind, coupled with Panasonic's industry-first quality guarantee, and now Panasonic's new FP series is a performance downgrade and upgrade, which shows FP8's ultra-high cost performance.

The only drawback of the FP8 is that there is no lens cap, but there is a high-strength UV lens, and even some netizens took the key to swipe through the lens, which is not damaged at all.

In fact, in Japan, Panasonic is the first in the field of home cameras in foreign countries, and then Fuji (the general quality of the workmanship is generally cost-effective, and the F series has long occupied the title of the king of card camera image quality) Sony (the quality of the workmanship is generally technological innovation, but it is valuable to buy 2,000 yuan with a back-illuminated sensor, and the hardware defects of the battery lock jitter door do not change, and the unlucky people should buy it carefully), Canon is just more advertising in China, and there are many people, and it is expensive, not worth buying.

FP8 supply is not much, FP1, FH1 can be used as an alternative, the licensed goods of the machine plus spare batteries, memory cards are about 1300 yuan.

Nikon, don't look at the rest.