Metaphysics is idealism, Hegel is also idealism, why did Hegel criticize metaphysics??

First of all, your formulation of this question is not very correct, so Kant is also idealistic, why Kant criticized metaphysics.

According to Lukacs, Heidegger also belongs to idealism, but Heidegger is critical of the whole philosophy after Greece. To get back to the point, each philosopher's own philosophical opinion is always based on a more perfect basis than his predecessors, or from a different perspective than his predecessors, so Hegel must criticize his predecessors, especially Kant, to prove the completeness of his system, which is the first point. Secondly, it is okay that Hegel was a metaphysician, but his philosophy is not all metaphysical babbling, his philosophy also contains dialectics:

Dialectics is the only way to abolish the static and other nature of metaphysics. Hegel's use of dialectical agency to critique the previous methods of metaphysics was very effective, and from this he developed the concept of historicity (Schelling also had it), Engels.

It is said that he was "the first person to try to discover logic in history". Hegel's use of the flow of history to dialectical logic naturally goes one step further than the static metaphysics of his predecessors, integrating the culmination of metaphysics, but he is ultimately surpassed by the closed nature of his system, the lack of practical elements, and some far-fetched ideas in order to explain reality. Marx.

In his early years, he was Hegelian, and his Das Kapital also said, "I want to openly admit that I am a student of Hegel." In fact, many philosophical books, such as Russell's opening criticism, criticize Hegel's philosophy as nonsense, but is this really the case? Many modern philosophical schools have borrowed from Hegel in many places, such as aesthetics, philosophy of law, and so on.

I've always been a big fan of Aristotle.

Evaluation of his teacher Plato.

The phrase "the ignorant man is not even qualified to comment on him" is the same for Hegel. My personal feeling is that the Kantian system can be understood almost by reading many introductory books, but Hegel is not good, you can only read the original work to read Hegel, and in most cases, the harvest of Hegel's sentence is different when you read it for the first time and the second time, for example, Marx understood the "Phenomenology of Spirit".

is far more than many people.

Hegel was a materialist.

Hegel is a representative of classical German philosophy and a political philosopher. He made the most systematic, richest and most complete exposition of German state philosophy, established the largest system of objective idealism in the history of world philosophy, and greatly enriched dialectics.

Hegel was a materialist.

Hegel is du German classical philosopher.

Representative of Zhixue, political DAO philosopher. He made the most systematic, richest and most complete exposition of German autocratic philosophy, established the largest system of objective idealism in the history of world philosophy, and greatly enriched the dialectic.

Contemptible view, Hegel bai

Whether it is idealistic or materialistic, it is not who has the final say, everyone has a different understanding, although many of them are adhered to the views of other people, after all, they are just biased comments.

People who grew up under the influence of Marx's so-called doctrines often think that Hegel is idealistic, and those who have been instilled by that set of doctrines since childhood rarely have the views of true understanding and real understanding. It seems to me that all "social sciences", including Marx's "scientific socialism", have an element of idealism, and Hegel is certainly no exception. Subjective feelings are much stronger in Marx than in Hegel, and it is actually more inconclusive who is more "idealistic" than whom.

In the "dialectics of history" that he founded, Hegel had a more objective and rational analysis than any other philosopher, and in this respect he was more materialistic than anyone else. It is unwise not to sum up a person in one sentence and one word, and to label him as history.

Today we are going to talk about the ideas of two great philosophers in history, one is Kant and the other is Hegel. Both philosophers were German, Kant was the founder of German classical rationalism, and Hegel was the philosophical master of idealism. What is Idealism?

What is Classical Rationalism?

Hegel-naïve objective idealist.

Hegel Bai is exquisite.

Idealistic philosophers, zhi is an objective idealist if he refines himself. dao

The so-called refinement refers to the large and systematic system of the ideological body of specialization. In philosophy, naïve has its special use, that is, to illustrate the simplicity and intuitiveness of a philosophy, such as naïve materialism, which generally attributes the origin of the world to one or several substances, such as Thales's water is the origin of all things. It is absolutely inappropriate to use it in Hegel.

According to Ludwig Shipper, Hegel seems to have "the existence of personality" in his theory of recognition in the theory of recognition of the real philosophical key

<> is equivalent to the real object of recognition. In The Phenomenology of Collapse and Spirituality, this "personality existence" is also an "acknowledged existence". However, this recognition is not the same as the "recognized existence" of "authorized independence".

In The Phenomenology of Spirit, Hegel discusses the "universality of the abstract image" that prevailed under the Roman state power in the section "The State of Law" in the chapter on Spirit.

For it is the first time that the whole natural historical world and the spiritual world are described as a process, describing the world in constant motion, change and development, and trying to reveal its inner relations, thus speculating on the dialectic of objective things based on idealism. Marx and Engels critically absorbed the core of reason, discarded its idealistic system, and established materialist dialectics. Famous representatives of idealism include Zhu Xi of China, Plato of ancient Greece, and Hegel of Germany.

Hegel's dialectic is to combine the transcendence of freedom and the necessity of norms, that is, to combine freedom and necessity, which is the culmination of the development of Western philosophy in the past. Since ancient Greece, all Western philosophies have emphasized the freedom of human beings, and there are also norms that emphasize human beings, and since the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, and the Age of Enlightenment, some people emphasize the breakthrough power of freedom, and some emphasize the power of norms, so Hegel dialectically combines the two and makes it dialectical reason.

When we think of Hegelian rationalism, we think of "Logos", and we think of his logical reason, which thinks that such things suppress human freedom. In fact, Hegel's rationality is not only logical rationality. This is a misunderstanding of him.

Hegel's rationality actually contains the spirit of freedom, emphasizing that logic is to give people a tool to realize their own freedom.

Therefore, rationalism should be viewed in a double sense, Hegel's rationalism is fundamentally not only a free, creative spirit, a free breakthrough and resistance, from the original state to a higher state, from a lower level of freedom to a higher level of freedom, Hegel believes that this process is history. Hegel's historical rationality is very famous, and his influence on Marx is also very deep.

Since history is from the lower level to the higher level, we can analyze it with reason, which is the level that reason constantly raises itself, and this is historical reason. Marx's historical materialism has very obvious traces of historical rationality. From Hegel's historical rationality, every society makes a leap from quantitative to qualitative change.

Something new has to come out every time. So, history is not just a book.

I'm also a little confused about this issue. But the landlord can take a look at this, can it inspire you.

Idealism is a manifestation of too much emptiness, but I don't think metaphysics is necessarily wrong. In the ancient Chinese Book of Changes, it is said that "the metaphysical is the way, and the metaphysical is the instrument", if the object is truly seen, then the truth is the invisible truth.

In Marx's theory, metaphysics is relative to dialectics. Marxists think that idealism is not desirable, but I personally think that idealism is the charm of philosophy. As Descartes said, "I think, therefore I am." "Thinking is the splendor of human existence, and negative thinking makes people sink.

Metaphysics has nothing to do with idealism.

Not that metaphysics is idealistic. Feuerbach is metaphysical materialism.