Is it that in a feudal society, whoever owns more land is the bigger the feudal lord

I think it should be like this. The root of the feudal system is the feudal land ownership system, so whoever owns more land, then.

I thought about the answer on the 3rd floor. It is said that the overall strength should be considered. However, I think that those with strong comprehensive strength will definitely use their comprehensive strength to get the most land, right? What do you think of the third floor?

Is this answer satisfactory?

It doesn't have to be like this, the most important thing is to look at the overall strength.

That's how it is in China.

Yes!!

In China, it is called landlord.

I don't know what it's called abroad!!

1. The grades are different.

The so-called lord refers to the big feudal lord who gives the land under his jurisdiction to the small feudal lord who is lower than his own rank, and then divides the feudal lord step by step, and finally reaches the hands of the peasants, and the smallest feudal lord collects tribute from the peasants at the same time has the obligation to pay tribute to the higher feudal lord, in this sense, the king or emperor is the largest lord.

The landlord, on the other hand, is the owner of the land, and after the peasant hands over the rent to him, he does not have to pay it again. The typical example of lord feudalism is medieval Western Europe and feudal Japan. And the representative of landlord feudalism is ancient China.

2. Different powers.

The lord can have administrative power in the territory, rule over the people under his jurisdiction, have his own army, and pay only tribute to the monarch. The landlords had ownership of the land, but they only leased the land to the peasants and exploited the peasants' labor income.

At present, the rural areas practice a land responsibility contract system, and the peasants only have the right to use but not ownership. Feudal land tenure was owned by private individuals.

The fundamental reasons for the drastic difference between the lives of landlords and peasants in feudal society are mainly as follows:

Landlords own land, peasants have no land: In feudal society, landlords own land, while peasants have no land, so they can only grow crops on the landlord's land and pay rent or labor to the landlord. This system of land tenure has created a huge disparity in the lives of landlords and peasants.

Landlords get more income: Landlords who occupy land can obtain more income by renting out the land, collecting rent, etc., while farmers can only reap the benefits by their own labor. This also led to the slippage and distance between the lives of the landlords and the peasants.

Landlords enjoy privileges: landlords enjoy privileges in politics, economy, culture, etc., and can use political, economic, and cultural means to protect their own interests, while peasants do not have these privileges and can only rely on their own labor to live.

The social status of landlords and peasants was different: in feudal society, landlords had a high social status, while peasants were at the bottom of society, which also led to a gap in the lives of landlords and peasants.

To sum up, the fundamental reason for the drastic difference between the lives of landlords and peasants in feudal society is the differences in land tenure system, unequal income distribution, privileges, and different social status.

Not exactly.

Private ownership of feudal land includes slave owner land ownership, feudal landlord land ownership, and capitalist land ownership.

The land distribution model in which land is owned and controlled by individuals is gradually formed with the development of social productive forces, the disintegration of the primitive commune system and the emergence of the private ownership system. The earliest form in history was the slave owner land ownership system, and with the development of the commodity economy, the feudal landlord land ownership system and the capitalist land ownership system were formed successively. The common feature of these three types of private ownership of land is the separation of agricultural laborers and land occupiers, with laborers having no land and landowners not working.

The landowner and the laborer are in an antagonistic position, and the relationship between the two is one of exploitation and exploitation. In addition, although there are subordinate private lands of individual peasants, they are often the object of annexation by large landowners.

To put it bluntly, feudal society was established by the landlord class, how could there be no landlords.

Quite simply, don't European countries also have capitalists? This is also a by-product of Chinese elitism.