Why are there so many manufacturers of Linux and only one manufacturer of Windows?

Because, Linux is open source. Red Hat, SUSE, Tubor, as well as domestic Red Flag, Chinasoft, etc., have done a little better and formed a brand. And Windows is developed by Microsoft itself.,Its ** will not be made public.,If there is a second one.,MS will sue others for infringement.,Sue and die.。

So, there can't be a second one.

Linux is open source, and the source of Windows** is Microsoft's own development and use.

Indeed, Windows is a brand, the finished product is a brand developed by Microsoft, and Linux is the source of the silver bucket source product state Bokai, open sail to call the source of the operating system, anyone can modify its core **, and then release it to become a new operating system. So you never know who developed Unix you're using.

You can say that. Generally speaking, people who can assemble their own computers are familiar with computers. So Windows is equivalent to saying that a mature product is for consumption, but you don't need to know all the information and materials in the product, and he won't tell you, because it has to be kept secret.

The Linux system is similar to a toy with instructions everywhere for you to assemble. You can make the best operating system, or you can choose what you need. Get rid of the things you don't want, but only if you know him well, and if you don't know him, it will take a lot of effort to just use it.

So I think Windows is more of a clever dealer who packs you everything you need and don't need, and doesn't allow you to choose. Linux, on the other hand, is like a self-selected marketplace where you can choose what you want and combine it in the way you want to buy what suits you best.

You can also understand it this way, it has this meaning.

The windows system is a closed-source system,Source blocking code**Not public,Everyone can pay to use,But you can't modify it at will,This is similar to the brand machine。

Linux is an open source system, the source is public, and the jujube leak is free, you can use and change it at will, it's more like a compatible machine, and the freedom to do it yourself is much greater.

Almost! Specifically, the win system is like you eat in a restaurant, the chef has already done it for you, you can eat without you, but it is difficult to say if the match does not meet your appetite; Linux is like cooking your own food at home, you can do whatever you want, you can play freely, it depends on your craft.

Mainly, Linux is all open source. Allow yourself to modify as needed. Windows is closed-source. You are not allowed to change it yourself.

You have a misunderstanding that Linux plays well, and you don't like Windows, because it is quietly open source for Linux, and there are a lot of limited transportation calendars in Windows, Linux is for people who have the ability, and Windows is for ruining the posture of the white.

There is no problem with this understanding, one is a fee and one is free, and the charge naturally provides more comprehensive and comfortable, and it is also the same number of gods to assemble a computer and a brand PC, but the DIY computer also has a lot of fun, and it is very suitable for students who have no money.