Why philosophy is consciously formed, while worldview is spontaneously formed. What is the differenc

Philosophy and worldview are both understandings and perceptions of the world, but they differ in the way and process by which they are formed.

Worldview refers to a person's overall view and basic view of the world, which is gradually formed by people in their lives and is usually influenced by a variety of factors such as culture, social environment, education, and personal experience. Through the accumulation of experience and thinking, people gradually form their own understanding and knowledge of the world, which is relatively scattered and simple, and lacks systematization and theory.

Philosophy, on the other hand, is a consciously formed systematic and theorized understanding of the world. Through rational thinking and philosophical methods, philosophy systematically sorts out and summarizes people's understanding of the world, forming a complete set of theoretical systems. Philosophy emphasizes the clear definition of concepts and the rigor of logical reasoning, and it raises people's understanding of the world to a new level through the abstraction of concepts and logical deduction.

Therefore, although worldview and philosophy are both knowledge and understanding of the world, the difference in the way they are formed makes their form and manifestation also different. Worldview is spontaneously formed, relatively naïve and fragmented, while philosophy is consciously formed and has a higher systematic and theoretical nature.

Self-realization: self-felt; Be aware of it yourself. It refers to people consciously and purposefully engaging in a certain activity.

Spontaneous: Occurs naturally. The process of the activity is unconscious, aimless, and blind.

The spontaneously formed world view is not systematized and theorized, and is simple and fragmented. Philosophy, on the other hand, is a theorized and systematic worldview.

"Self-formed", in fact, is closely related to your life. Philosophical understanding itself is a kind of life experience, and a person's philosophical understanding is a unique life experience.

In philosophy, self-esteem, self-awareness, and freedom are all very important concepts, each with its own unique meaning and usage.

Freedom refers to the existence of the thing itself, that is, its essence and attributes, which have nothing to do with human will and behavior. Ease can also refer to a state in which there is no disturbance or influence. The concept of self is often associated with ontology (the study of the nature of being) and epistemology (the study of the nature of knowledge).

Self-belief refers to the ability of human beings to act and think consciously, as well as their ability to understand and transform the world. The concept of self-being is often associated with blind human behavior and social practices.

Self-awareness refers to a person's awareness and understanding of their own existence and surrounding environment, as well as reflection and scrutiny of their own actions and decisions. The concept of self-consciousness is often associated with human nature and self-awareness.

Freedom refers to the freedom of action and thought, that is, the ability to be free from external restrictions and interference. The concept of freedom is often associated with ethics (the study of morality and values) and political philosophy.

The distinction between these four concepts is not very clear, and there is a lot of overlap and overlap between them. In philosophy, these concepts are often interrelated and mutually influential, and need to be understood and explained in a specific context.

To be at ease is to be independent. Opposite, distinguishing from the existence of something else.

Being self is similar to being at ease, but it is talking about subjectivity, that is, subjective consciousness.

Self-consciousness should be subjective initiative plus reflection.

Freedom, like the literal sense, mainly refers to free will. Different philosophical schools have different specific meanings.

It is impossible to have specific backgrounds and philosophers, and the first Chinese translation itself cannot be completely accurate, and each philosopher and philosophical school has its own language. Second, this is the basic philosophical consciousness of human beings, and even if there is, it is only the certainty of the formulation.

Philosophical concepts cannot be taken literally, they must be understood in their entirety, and it is meaningless to mention just one word.

In philosophy, spontaneity and self-consciousness are two important but distinct concepts.

First of all, in terms of meaning, spontaneity refers to those phenomena or behaviors in nature or human society that occur naturally and without the influence of external forces. Spontaneity is usually unconscious, instinctive, or mechanical. Consciousness, on the other hand, refers to the behavior or decision that human beings actively make through their own consciousness and thinking.

Self-consciousness is conscious, rational, or autonomous, and it usually encompasses the subjective will of the person and the active planning of behavior.

Second, by nature, spontaneity and self-consciousness have different characteristics. Spontaneity is essentially determined by objective conditions and laws, while self-consciousness is determined by subjective will and choice. Spontaneity can be seen as a budding state of consciousness to some extent, and although its behavior may lack clear awareness and purpose, it may involve an adaptation to the environment and conditions.

Consciousness, on the other hand, is a more rational and purposeful behavior, which includes people's active planning and choice of behavior.

In addition, there are differences between spontaneity and self-consciousness in terms of planning, consequence prediction, and behavior. In terms of planning, spontaneous people may be governed by historical inevitability in social activities, lacking clear plans and goals. Self-conscious people, on the other hand, understand the meaning of their activities and have a clearer purpose and plan.

In terms of consequence foresight, spontaneous people may not be able to accurately foresee the consequences of their activities, while conscious people can foresee possible consequences according to their goals and plans. In behavior, spontaneity may be an unconscious or mechanical action, while self-consciousness is a conscious, autonomous, and rational action.

In general, there are significant differences between the concepts of spontaneity and self-consciousness in philosophy in terms of meaning, essence, planning, consequence foresight, and behavior. Spontaneity is usually spontaneous and unconscious, while self-consciousness is made actively through the subjective will and thinking of the person, with a clear goal and plan.

The subjective and objective conditions are different, and the meaning is different.

1. Subjective and objective conditions: Spontaneous behaviors and phenomena are usually determined by objective conditions and laws, while self-consciousness is determined by subjective will and choice.

2. Spontaneity refers to the phenomenon or behavior that occurs naturally in nature or human society that is not controlled by external forces, while self-consciousness refers to the behavior or decision made by human beings through their own consciousness and thinking. Spontaneity is usually unconscious, instinctive, or mechanical, while self-consciousness is conscious, rational, or autonomous.

3. Philosophy is essentially a discipline that studies the basic and universal problems of the world, and is a theoretical system about the worldview.

Spontaneity, which arises naturally without being influenced by external forces, is the opposite of self-awareness. Lenin said that the "elements of spontaneous cultivation" are in essence the embryonic state of consciousness.

And self-consciousness is to take the initiative to do it when you have an understanding. As far as human activity itself is concerned, spontaneity means that people are blindly governed by historical necessity in social activities, without consciousness, planning, and lofty goals. Self-consciousness means that people understand the meaning of their activities to a certain extent in social activities, and have a clearer purpose and plan.

The activities of any individual, social group, and the entire historical development of mankind are a process from spontaneous to conscious. The degree to which people understand the meaning of their social activities, that is, the degree to which people's consciousness is exerted, is conditioned by social conditions. Before the advent of civilization, people's activities were largely spontaneous.

The more society moves forward, the more conscious people become. Under the conditions of Zheng Xiang's private shouting of the circle fighting system, most of people's daily activities, in terms of their significance to social change, were in a state of spontaneity, and it was only during the period of social revolution that the consciousness of people's activities was prominently manifested. The struggle of the working class against the capitalists was initially expressed as a spontaneous struggle limited to immediate interests, such as the blind destruction of machinery and the mere demand for better working conditions and higher wages, without realizing the need to change the entire social system.

With the deepening of the struggle, the workers' movement developed into a conscious struggle with the goal of winning the victory of socialism and communism. The guidance of Marxist scientific theory and the leadership of the Communist Party are the basic conditions for the workers' movement to leap from spontaneous to conscious.

Under the conditions of socialism, the proletariat relies on Marxist theory to reveal the law of development of socialist society in an increasingly deep way, so that people's consciousness of creating history can be brought into play unprecedentedly and conditions are created for the transition to a communist society. However, in the course of advancing the cause of socialism and communism, many new situations and new problems will inevitably arise, and people must still have a process of gradual and in-depth understanding, and people's activities will also go through the process of moving from spontaneous to conscious and constantly improving their consciousness.

The worldview is a consciously formed theoretical system", such a statement is wrong. Because:

In the process of social speculation, people will spontaneously form a certain world view, but it is often scattered and simple, and lacks theoretical argumentation. The formation of a theoretical system of world view can only be realized after people (such as philosophers) systematically study, sort out and study it, and express it in a special theoretical form.

The systematization and theorization of the worldview became a philosophical manuscript.

a. The statement is wrong, concrete science is the foundation of philosophy, philosophy is the generalization and summary of specific science, and it cannot be said that "philosophy is an all-encompassing science that overrides all sciences";

b. The statement is wrong, philosophy stems from people's questioning of practice and thinking about the world of the opposition;

c. Falsely, only true philosophy is the clever way to solve the problem;

d is correct in saying that concrete science is the basis of philosophy, and philosophy is a generalization and summary of specific science Therefore, d

Mistake. Philosophy is a worldview, but a worldview is not necessarily philosophy.

Philosophy is a theorized and systematic worldview, or a theoretical system of worldview. Therefore, philosophy is not formed spontaneously and must be formed through learning.

Worldviews are formed spontaneously, and adults of sound mind will form worldviews in the course of their lives, but they cannot spontaneously form philosophies.

No, I went to school in books.