About mechanical determinism! What is Mechanical Determinism

The initial property of matter was infinitely before time, or there was no original property of matter at all. Mechanical determinism is not inherently in conflict with subjective agency.

Mechanical determinism: refers to the fact that the development of matter is determined by the properties of matter. But it's not that everything is decided by the big ** 13 billion years ago. The reason why the big ** occurs is determined by the previous state of existence of the universe. So, things.

Subjective initiative: It means that all human thoughts and behaviors are basically determined by self-subjective consciousness. That is to say: all thoughts and behaviors are developed autonomously, freely and consciously from the subjective consciousness of the self.

The connection between self-subjective consciousness and matter: Self-subjective consciousness is the final form of all the interlocking manifestations produced by the properties of matter that make up the conscious brain (the part of the brain that produces consciousness) at the same time. In other words, the ultimate manifestation of matter at the same moment is the nature and form of the subjective consciousness of the self at that moment.

Our thoughts and behaviors are determined by the properties of the substances that make up the brain, that is to say, our actions and thoughts are determined by the nature and form of our subjective consciousness. Therefore, we still have subjective initiative, because our thoughts and actions are still autonomous, free, and conscious based on our own subjective consciousness.

If in doubt, you can add. Launched on weekend nights.

Determinism is a philosophical theory about the causality, necessity and regularity of things, and occupies an important position in the system of philosophical theories.

According to the different factors that determine the historical development of society, historical determinism is divided into four categories: theological teleology, idealism, mechanistic and historical determinism of historical materialism.

Theological teleological determinism of historical determinism reduces causal connections in social history to pre-arranged outcomes of God, Providence, or Providence hidden in the dark, and the course and outcome of history are determined entirely by this mysteriousness.

This view, on the surface, God or God is the cause of all things, in fact, fundamentally denies that things have their own cause and effect and laws, so in essence, it belongs to the historical determinism of idealism, which is a kind of indeterminism.

Idealistic historical determinism acknowledges the inevitability and regularity of social and historical development, but does not recognize the objective reality of social historical movements.

It always regards spiritual things as the decisive factor in the development and change of society, and as the cause and main driving force of the historical process.

Mechanical determinism is to take matter and its mechanical motion as the decisive factor, and simply extend Laplace's dynamic determinism from nature directly to the field of social history.

Mechanical determinism applies only to macroscopic objects, while the study of the microscopic realm and the abundance of contingent phenomena in the objective world gives rise to statistical determinism.

Statistical laws that apply probabilistic and statistical methods to study do not constitute a negation of objective laws, and therefore do not constitute a negation of determinism.

In essence, it is dialectical determinism that acknowledges that contingency and necessity are both opposites and unified.

Historical determinism of historical materialism regards economic factors as the factors that determine the direction of social and historical development.

The problem of mechanical determinism is to absolutize objective regularity and inevitability. Thus ignoring subjective initiative and contingency.

It's like what you dream about at night and what you'll do tomorrow. Although there is a certain connection to your present and past, it is by no means certain and will be variable.

The Buddha said: All laws are impermanent.

There is only one thing in the world, whether there is only one inevitable result or the possibility of multiple outcomes, in the end, only one outcome will be produced, and there will not be multiple outcomes at the same time. In this sense, there is no difference whether there is contingency or not.

The problem with mechanistic determinism is that if the known conditions for a problem are not fully grasped, then no results can be deduced, and in reality most of the time it is impossible to grasp all the conditions of a problem. In addition, any part of the machinery is equally important, ** failure, the machinery can not operate normally, according to this line of thinking to analyze and solve the problem, it will lead to the primary and secondary.

Now there is a saying that thinking is not a chemical reaction, but a quantum reaction, and thinking is a set reaction of quantum entanglement, which can explain the probabilistic nature of thinking, as well as the inconceivability of thinking. Because quantum theory itself is incredible, this coincides with the incredibleness of thinking, hehe. Of course, this requires proving that thinking is not material, but energy, which is quite simple, when a person dies, the mind is gone, and it cannot be restarted.

Determinism is based on conditions, that is, you can only arrive at a certain result if you know all the conditions you need.

It's like if you do a proof problem, you go through the conditions in the problem and slowly come up with the answer according to various theorems, but what if you remove one condition? Then obviously, you won't be able to come up with the answers you want.

Now, too, you can learn about the uncertainty principle, or the uncertainty principle. This theory is one of the cornerstones of quantum mechanics. To put it simply, there are situations where you can't measure what you need.

For example, a tube is 1m long, but based on this theory, you can't measure the tube length of 1m for some reason, that is, you have lacked the conditions, so you can't continue to prove.

Mechanistic determinism is not entirely a priori. Transcendental theory only sees and only acknowledges the role of the experience of predecessors, ignores the great active role of man in transforming nature, denies that man can constantly understand and make use of the objective laws of nature and the infinite development of man's understanding in his practical activities, holds that experience determines everything, and advocates doing things based on experience. The most important characteristic of mechanistic determinism is that it looks at problems and things one-sidedly, denies that things are universally related and widely developed, and fails to see the mutual agency between things.

The similarity between the two lies in ignoring the universal connection of things, looking at the problem in isolation, and exaggerating certain aspects of the connection. The difference lies in the difference in the scope described by the two. Transcendentalism can be mechanistic determinism, but mechanistic determinism is not necessarily transcendentalism.