What s going on with the Simpson case in the United States?

Just take a look at the relevant question on the right.

The Simpson CaseThe real ** is GlennRogersGlenn Rogers, an American death row inmate, claims that he is the real murderer of Simpson's ex-wife and her boyfriend. Simpson didn't kill anyone, but he wasn't innocent.

On November 21, 2012, a documentary broadcast by the Investigation Discovery Channel in the United States caused another sensation in the United States. The documentary points out the 50-year-old serial killer through careful investigation.

Rogers is likely to be the real Simpson's ex-wife Nicole Brown and friend Goldman. This is undoubtedly a bombshell.

Rogers' brother, Clay, told the producers of the Investigative Discovery Channel that his brother had personally told him that he had done the murder, and that he had gone to his ex-wife's house at Simpson's request to steal a pair of earrings, about $20,000, and told her that you could take her down if necessary.

It was a very difficult thing to convince Americans of Simpson's innocence. What kind of shock has the discovery of new evidence brought to American justice and American society? Relevant experts told reporters that the new evidence may make some Americans realize that the trial of that year adhered to procedural justice.

Civil trials

Four months after the end of the criminal trial, Goldman's parents, Fred Goldman and Sharon Rufo, died of unnatural causes.

In order to sue Simpson, Brown's father, Lou Brown, fought a "legacy war" with Simpson on behalf of Brown's estate.

The case, at the request of the judge, was not broadcast on television. The lawyer for the Goldman family was Daniel Petrocelli, and the lawyer for Simpson was Bob Baker. Lawyers for both the defense and prosecution were highly praised by the lawyers present.

Simpson's defense in the case was estimated to be $1 million, covered by an insurance policy of his company, Orenthal.

At one point, Baker allowed Petrocelli to present evidence that Simpson had failed to pass the polygraph in the ** case, which became his mistake. Foreman was not called to testify, while Simpson was called to testify for himself.

Civil trial jury.

Verdict, as the children of Brown and Simpson, Sidney and Justin.

$12.5 million will be received from Simpson, the heir to Brown's estate. Victim.

Families were awarded $33.5 million in compensatory and punitive damages. Simpson has been criticized for trying to circumvent the verdict by hiding assets after a jury ruled against him.

Today is July 4th, and just today, the supposedly Chinese version of Simpson's wife murder case has been reversed again, The suspect Chang Linfeng was sentenced to a suspended death sentence again, and this is also a rare reversal in the history of our country, so what information is worth paying attention to in this case?

Chang Linfeng himself is the deputy editor-in-chief of a well-known magazine, and his wife Ma Li is a university professor, according to Chang Linfeng's first statement, he was because his wife told him about the matter, his wife's tone was very bad, which caused him to be grumpy, and the two sides had a fight, and finally strangled his wife, and then through the cardboard boxes found on the second and first floors, the scene was ignited. And the first reversal was when Chang Linfeng faced the trial, saying that he was forced to confess. Firstly, the possibility of a fight between the two sides was not found at the place of the incident, and secondly, according to neighbors, oneThere are no waste cartons as flammable materials on the floor and second floor.

However, according to the certificate given by the fire brigade and Jishuitan Hospital, this arson cannot rule out artificial arson。And the deceased Ma Li cannot rule out mechanical asphyxiation death, and judging according to the deceased's condition,The deceased should have died before the fire. And all this is not excluded, so whether Chang Linfeng killed or not, no one can give a clear judgment at present.

First of all, Chang Linfeng said that he did have an extramarital affair, but he did not consider getting married, and he did not divorce his wife Ma Li, and this statement cannot prove that Chang Linfeng had this motive to kill. Secondly, he said that he was tortured to extract a confession, and showed his injured hand, but the hospital believed that Chang Linfeng had his own diseaseSo he changed his story to the fact that the police did not take the medicine in time and stayed up all night to extract a confession, but all this was in accordance with the procedure, so whether this is true or false is also a question.

I hope that the results of Chang Linfeng's case will be announced to the world as soon as possible!

At present, the suspect is imprisoned in Beijing No. 2 Prison, the time between the two verdicts of the first instance and the second instance is 3,205 days apart, the defense statement of the second trial shows that the existing evidence cannot prove that Chang Linfeng has a motive for the crime, most of the evidence is found to be inconsistent with the confession, and the case needs to be re-understood after a long time.

The case of Chang's murder of his wife and cremation of the body involved "extorting confessions by torture" + "insufficient direct evidence" and never suspecting the crime: in the incident, Chang had already pleaded guilty but immediately appealed for "extorting confessions by torture", and at the same time believed that the evidence directly proving his murder was insufficient, so there was a not-guilty verdict. The subsequent reversal of the sentence was to find additional evidence.

The Simpson murder case is very complicated, "alibi" + "** evidence is full of loopholes" + "** may be perjury" and even racial discrimination, etc., and finally the suspect was never found guilty: Simpson's wife murder case, full of suspicions, all parties game, very complicated and not at all a relatively direct case like Chang's murder of his wife and cremation, if you want to know, you can investigate, in short, it is very exciting, and the forces of all parties are-for-tat. Chang's murder of his wife and the cremation of his body were finally changed to a guilty verdict, and Simpson's murder of his wife was not guilty, and the result was different.

Therefore, the complexity of Chang's murder of his wife and the burning of his body is not worthy of the Chinese version of the "Simpson murder case". But whether you deserve it or not, as long as you can bring the bad guys to justice, this is the purpose of the law!

As for the reason why he killed his wife, as well as how he committed the crime at home, and **he had divorced his wife before and then fought for the custody of the child, it is worth paying attention to.

The Simpson murder case is very complicated, with "alibi" + "** evidence full of loopholes" + "** possible perjury" and even racial discrimination. In the end, the suspect was never found guilty: Simpson ** his wife The case is full of suspicions, and all parties are playing a game of pie royal.

It's complicated. It is not a relatively simple case such as the murder and cremation of Mrs. Chang's body.