Legal Help... Urgent.. Urgent.. Rush 10

It's a work-related injury! Your wife's unit is evading responsibility. The employer may be required to bear the liability for work-related injury compensation through labor arbitration on the grounds of work-related injury. If the arbitration result is not satisfactory, you can also file a lawsuit in court. There is a lot of hope for winning.

When determining liability for work-related accidents, work-related injury identification and labor ability appraisal shall be conducted. The significance of work-related injury determination is to determine whether the work-related injury liability is constituted, while the labor ability appraisal is to determine what kind of work-related injury benefits the injured employee enjoys.

In addition, if the person with a low IQ is found by the unit, if the person's condition is serious, the unit should also bear certain security responsibilities, of course, the main responsibility is borne by its legal guardian.

In short, if you want to sue this low-IQ employee, the court or arbitration authority will not accept it, but will deal with it as a work-related accident, and the employer can recover compensation from that person after assuming the responsibility for the work-related injury.

For specific matters, you can consult a local lawyer.

Good luck!

If your IQ is so low that you need to be taken care of by your family or relatives or friends.

Then you can go to his guardian and hold him accountable.

If you have a low IQ and can take responsibility, then let him take responsibility for himself.

Who bears it specifically. This court will tell you clearly when it decides ...

The legal guardian of the person who can sue your wife can name the factory as the second defendant, because the factory has the responsibility to create a good working environment for the employees.

No, as long as you are in self-defense, the law will not hold you accountable. It is only necessary to prove that your actions fall within the scope of legitimate defence. For example, if you knock him unconscious and then stab him to death, it is not justified defense, but excessive defense; And if you stab him to death in the course of a fight, that's justified defense.

Depending on the situation, if there is evidence that the person will kill his family, then you will not be legally responsible for defending until his death. If there is no evidence that the person will kill his family, and you use a sharp weapon that is not his hand to cause his death, then there are two possibilities, one is intentional injury or intentional homicide, and the other is excessive self-defense.

It is justified defense and there is no responsibility.

You said that you and your family stabbed each other to death in self-defense. In fact, the first thing you have to find out is whether you are justified in self-defense. If so, then of course there is no problem, there is no need to pay legal responsibility, this 19680304 has already said.

If not, then you will have to pay the corresponding legal responsibility. But whether it is justified defense depends on the circumstances at the time.

You should be justified in self-defense and not criminally responsible.

Whatever the reason is, this person rushed into the house, but according to what you described, you are not responsible, you are justified defense, but when the facts are determined, it is not all what you described, according to the conclusion that you have now given, what you describe is justifiable defense and belongs to special defense, and the one who caused the death of the aggressor does not need to be held liable.

In our country, the ownership of a house is confirmed by the registration records of the housing registration authority. That is, if there is no registration, there is no acquisition of house ownership.

Thus, in the present case, neither man nor woman acquired ownership of the house. Of course, there is no such thing as a lawsuit for affirmation.

The purchase contract and the loan contract were signed by two people, but the two parties had reached an agreement that the woman would transfer the rights and obligations of the contract. Moreover, the man has fulfilled his obligations. As a result, the woman has withdrawn from the contract.

As for risk aversion, you keep the purchase contract, the loan contract, the agreement between the two and the receipt written by the woman. When you can register the ownership of the house, you will go to the registration.

There's basically no risk. Because there is no registration of the woman's name in the house title registration.

You can tell him all about it, sue him for defrauding 70,000 yuan, and ask him to pay it back twice!! I hate this kind of person).

1. (1) Right. Due to the registration and publicity, the ownership of the house was obtained.

2) Owned by C. Due to the registration and publicity, the ownership of the house was obtained. At the same time, A has a claim of 650,000 yuan against C, and B can require A to bear the liability for breach of contract.

2. A: Robbery. Burglary, statutory aggravation. According to the law, if the person is found to have used violence on the spot during the theft, and the conviction is based on the crime of robbery, it is a transformative robbery crime.

B, C: Theft. Accomplices or accomplices may be mitigated, commuted, or exempted in accordance with law. Since B and C only have the intent to commit theft together with A, but not the common intent to rob, they only bear criminal liability within the scope of joint intent.

Law is a system of norms enacted or approved by the state and guaranteed by the coercive power of the state, reflecting the will of the ruling class determined by specific material conditions of life. [1] Law is the embodiment of the will of the ruling class and the ruling instrument of the state.

1.If the mortgage is not registered, the mortgage is not established;

2.If the mortgage is registered, you can sell the house and repay the loan, and the balance still belongs to you;

3.If it is agreed in advance in the loan contract that if one party fails to repay the loan on time, the house belongs to the other party, and the clause is invalid;

2.Parts that exceed four times the interest rate of the same type of loan from the bank are not supported by the law and do not have to be returned.

1.Article 187 of the Property Law.

Where the property provided for in items 1 to 3 of the first paragraph of Article 180 of this Law is mortgaged or the building under construction provided for in item 5 of this Law is mortgaged, the mortgage registration shall be completed. The mortgage is created at the time of registration.

The properties subject to mortgage registration are: (1) buildings and other land attachments; (2) the right to use construction land; (3) Wasteland and other land contracting and management rights obtained by means of bidding, auction, public consultation, etc.; (4) Buildings under construction.

Therefore, the mortgage is not valid.

2. Article 40 of the Law of the People's Republic of China on the Promotion of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises.

The State encourages all kinds of social intermediary organizations to provide small and medium-sized enterprises with services such as information consultation, investment and financing, loan guarantees, and legal consultation.

The interest rate of private loans may be appropriately higher than the interest rate of banks, but the maximum interest rate shall not exceed four times the interest rate of similar bank loans (including the interest rate principal).

Your problem is that it is a private loan, and the part of the interest that exceeds the maximum interest set by the state is not protected by law. You can go to your local police station to report the crime. Seek the protection of the law.

Wine is the fragrance of aging, and there is nothing wrong with this. But it can only refer to Chinese baijiu, which is also our common pride, hehe.

As for what you said about selling, this should be treated differently:

First, what is the packaging of the liquor you are keeping, that is, what is the container, such as jars, glass wine bottles, etc.

Second, what brand is this wine, such as sorghum red and so on.

In fact, if it is not a famous brand or a jar with very ordinary packaging, it is better to take it out to entertain distinguished guests when your family has a major happy event, or invite relatives and friends to taste it together during the New Year's holidays. The more people there are, the more lively it feels. Hehe.

If (just if) if you are short of money to spend, this wine is a little famous, and the packaging is more formal, then you find a distributor who distributes this brand of wine, it is easy to get out (or contact the manufacturer directly for consultation, they can ** as a collector's level series for product packaging, but you have to have a quantity, or they are used in sugar and wine fairs, exhibitors and tastings to improve popularity, etc.). If he's interested, if you ask for more, he'll accept it.

If you are not short of money, then you might as well keep it for yourself, and entertain VIPs is definitely not chilling...

Writing so much, I hope it can help you!

1. Your pre-marital property is considered your husband's personal property and cannot be divided.

2. You can share half of your income after marriage, including the income of the enterprise, but you must pay attention to the evidence and don't let your husband transfer all the money. The safest thing is to apply for property preservation before filing a lawsuit, so that he cannot transfer it.

3. There is domestic violence, and the other party has cohabited with another person, which is a situation that should be divorced.

4. For the party who pays more obligations at home (that is, you), you can be appropriately compensated.

5. In divorce cases where there is domestic violence or the other party cohabits with others, the innocent party may divide more property.

It is advisable to hire a lawyer who specializes in matrimonial law**, and if what you say is true, then the evidence is very favorable to you, you can divide more than half of the joint property of the husband and wife, and you can also claim a large amount of moral damages because the husband is at fault.

1. If the house is in the name of his parents, it can't be divided.

2. In principle, half of the other property acquired after marriage, you can have more than one share as the innocent party, and the court can decide how much more you have.

3. Regarding the enterprise, if the enterprise is invested and established after marriage, the woman can also get a share according to the different nature of the enterprise.

4. The child's custody can be negotiated or sued.

If you are determined to divorce, it is important to hire a lawyer secretly, because there is more property involved, and it is more responsible, including the investigation of the property situation in the early stage, and the final prosecution can be entrusted to a lawyer, so as to protect your legitimate rights and interests to the greatest extent.

1. Is there a traffic police involved in the handling of this case? If there is, wait for the accident identification of the traffic police force;

2. Regarding the woman's injuries and other hospital diagnosis results, pay attention to which of the expenses are irrelevant;

3. Notify the insurance company that this situation should fall within the scope of compulsory traffic insurance compensation, and pay attention to the notice and retain evidence;

It is recommended to call the police first and ask the traffic police to make a determination of responsibility for the traffic accident, and the compensation must be based on the disability appraisal of the medical department and the bill to be compensated.

It is recommended that you come to the law firm in the high-tech zone for legal advice.