Ask someone who understands the law, preferably a lawyer. Kneel and beg, kneel and beg, kneel and be

OK. If there is evidence that you really got leukemia because of work, it is best to have a certificate or something, but this is usually difficult. Do you mean compensation other than medical expenses?

Labor Law: Article 54 Employers must provide workers with labor safety and health conditions and necessary labor protection articles that comply with the provisions of the State, and shall conduct regular health examinations for workers engaged in work with occupational hazards.

For those engaged in operations with occupational hazards, such as the use of phenol viscose in the processing and production of shoes and clothing, the factory is responsible for providing labor safety and health conditions, and necessary protective equipment, and conducting regular physical health examinations. If these are not done, the factory shall bear the corresponding responsibility and compensate the employee for all medical expenses, lost work and mental damages.

After your case has been forensically appraised, you can refer to the relevant provisions of the Labor Law to protect your legitimate rights and interests. As for how to make compensation, please refer to the Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases

If there is sufficient evidence to prove that the acute leukemia is caused by the working environment, the work-related injury appraisal can be done and the claim can be claimed according to the work-related injury. It is also possible to claim for general personal injury compensation.

It depends on where the doctor is, how he got the disease, if it is not for work reasons, there is no basis for mental damage and compensation.

Why Compensation and Moral Damages Fee?

Is acute leukemia caused by the company's poor working environment or heavy pollution?

Find a legal aid agency for advice and help.

1.Whether or not to pronounce a suspended sentence is prescribed by law, and if the crime and circumstances involved fall within the scope of the law and should be sentenced to a suspended sentence, the court must impose a suspended sentence, and if it is "may", it is the discretion of the court to not impose a suspended sentence.

2.In cases where the summary procedures are generally applied, the circumstances are relatively minor, the controversy is not great, and the suspect has a good attitude in admitting guilt, the punishment shall generally be mitigated, and whether or not to suspend the sentence depends on the specific circumstances of the case.

3.Release on bail pending further investigation is only an investigative method of not detaining suspects during the investigation stage, and has no direct relationship with the outcome of the court's judgment.

To sum up, whether or not to impose a suspended sentence depends on whether the facts + circumstances fall within the category of probation, and through your description, probation should be applicable.

1. It is not possible to "apply" for a suspended sentence, and whether or not to impose a suspended sentence on the defendant is directly announced by the court, not by you; In addition, theoretically, a suspended sentence of less than three years in prison can be imposed; Of course, the court has the right to directly impose a sentence; (If you are not satisfied, you can only appeal).

2. Theoretically, the probability is the same; But I think the chances of a summary probation are really better. (Because there are fewer people involved, the judge has more discretion).

3. Release on bail pending trial does not mean a suspended sentence.

1. In some cases, the court may impose a suspended sentence of less than three years in prison. The court is to make a suspended sentence or a real sentence based on comprehensive consideration of the nature of the case, the circumstances of the crime, and the harmfulness to society.

2. The facts of the case are simple and the facts are clear, and the summary procedures may be applied, and the judge shall try the case alone. It has nothing to do with probation.

3. The probability of being given a suspended sentence after release on bail pending trial is greater, but the nature of the case, the circumstances of the crime, and the harmfulness to society should also be comprehensively considered.