Please ask the lawyer and the heroes to help! Please help me with some advice. Thank you!

You're at fault, think about it another way, what if you're the one downstairs?

Of course, you can ask the other party to provide evidence to prove the value of the tea cake.

If there is no proper notice such as water stopping.

It is appropriate to think about the water company to claim part of your loss.

From what you said, both the water company and your mother are at fault and should be jointly held liable for the infringement below.

You can ignore these terms and conditions of the company, because according to the provisions of the Labor Contract Law, unless the company has conclusive evidence to prove that you have been trained and there is a definite training fee, then you will only be required to compensate the company for the training expenses when you unilaterally terminate the contract (provided that you sign a training service agreement).

In addition, you don't have to worry about any penalty if the employee unilaterally terminates the contract. You can inform the company of the relevant provisions of the law, and if they have seized your documents and so on this ground, you can file a complaint with the labor inspection department or even go to labor arbitration.

Additional answer: Please rest assured that although your contract was signed before the implementation of the Labor Contract Law, the Labor Contract Law can be applied because your current employment relationship with the employer has not been terminated.

If you are still not at ease, you can directly check the relevant provisions of the Labor Contract Law.

In short, in a word, you do not need to pay any form of liquidated damages, including "compensation for the vocational skills training provided by the company and the resulting impact on the talent pool".

I would like to ask, in which article did you find that you need to pay liquidated damages? Isn't it the old labor law or local regulations?

As for the issue of liquidated damages, most legal practitioners agree to deal with them in accordance with the provisions of the new law, and you can consult a lawyer around you or ask the labor bureau directly.

Forensic medical examination is to pursue criminal liability, and civil compensation does not require forensic medical examination, only a bill of hospitalization expenses. This case is obviously civil, both parties are at fault, and a dozen lawsuits are mediated by the court, so it is difficult for both parties to pursue responsibility and compensation. Besides, the money you spent in the lawsuit has not compensated you much, and the gains outweigh the losses.

Both parties are at fault, and there are no obvious injuries, so if this case has to be fought, it can only be of little use if your family spends money.

According to what you said, your pigs were not closed properly because the mistake was caused in the first place, and it is even more wrong for you to start beating people first, and it is good that people don't let the police station investigate your responsibility for doing it first, and you still want to file a lawsuit, which is obviously not good for yourself. Endure the calm for a while, take a step back, and the sea and the sky, and the harmony between neighbors is still precious.

For the sake of your family's happiness and happiness, you must persuade your family well, reflect deeply, and stop worrying, after all, you are wrong first.

The legal ownership of the vehicle is obtained through litigation, and the remaining part of the debt can be enforced by the court.

First of all, you must find your friends, otherwise the court will not file a case against you.

Secondly, you can ask your friend to return the expenses incurred to you later, and as for the car, you can continue to use it.

The transfer of ownership of the car cannot be compulsory, and both parties need to work together.

The key to dealing with this kind of thing is to find someone who can negotiate or litigate.

1. Is there an IOU? If there is an IOU, there is evidence, and you can sue the court. It doesn't matter if the other person is not there, the court can summon him, and if he does not appear in court after a certain period of time, he may be sentenced in absentia.

Once you have the judgment, you can apply to the Executive Directorate for enforcement. In the absence of an IOU, two disinterested persons are required to testify.

2. If you can't find anyone, and there is no property to enforce, it will be more troublesome to execute. Good thing his car is with you. According to his meaning, his car was sold to you for 30,000 yuan, a verbal agreement was made, and the subject matter was delivered.

According to the property law, the transfer of a car is not valid for registration, but against a bona fide third party. So he actually owes you 20,000.

Article 24 of the Property Law The creation, alteration, transfer and extinction of real rights in ships, aircraft and motor vehicles shall not be used against bona fide third parties without registration.

The car is already yours, and you are responsible for paying for insurance and annual inspections. I'm not sure about this, I'm skeptical.

5. It should be possible to transfer ownership, and you can call ** to ask the administrative department for vehicle transfer.

6. At this time, go to the transfer after getting the judgment.

According to the regulations of Beijing, one of the bases for the transfer of ownership of a motor vehicle is that the people's court mediates, adjudicates or adjures up a judgment to transfer the motor vehicle, and its source certificate is the effective "Mediation Statement", "Ruling" or "Judgment" issued by the people's court and the corresponding "Notice of Assistance in Enforcement".

Filing a lawsuit with the court, service of notice, default judgment.

The property of the car seat defendant can be enforced, auctioned or discounted, but it cannot be directly forced to be transferred to you.

Oh, I haven't learned this yet. The car is a quasi-immovable property, and China adopts the doctrine of registration confrontation, and if it is not registered, although the contract is valid, it cannot be used against a third party.

I'm just a law student.

1. Exemption Certificate: 1The lease agreement between you and the tenant. Proof that you are a lessor and have nothing to do with the merchandising business.

2.did not make false advertising for the operator (if the plaintiff adduces evidence, you can reasonably deny it).

2. If the lessee has left due to the expiration of the lease, you cannot be exempted from liability, but you can recover from the original lessee after compensation.

1.The invoice of the person who bought the shoes has specific information on it;

2.Your lease agreement with the merchant.

According to article 17 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases, "the compensation obligor shall compensate the victim for personal injury, all expenses incurred due to medical treatment** and the loss of income due to lost work, including medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospital meal subsidies, and necessary nutrition expenses." ”

Therefore, if you have no relevant evidence, even if you go to court, you will lose the right to win the lawsuit.

As for how much you need to compensate the other party, it depends on the actual expenses of the other party and the resulting loss of income.

If you pay for medical expenses, you will pay for it.

It is estimated that you hit someone, and if the other person is not injured (including external and internal injuries), there is no question of compensation.