A logical thinking question Ask for help from a master 5

So be it. Boss AThe wife is in order, and so on.

Go with C1, and there is only one woman on the right side of the --- back C. It's okay to go with women) Go, b1 back.

Go. A1 back ---B, C's wives are on the right side).

c go. C, C1 back--- here B or C back by itself. If the wife is on the right side, something will happen. A certain wife replied. There is also an a. on the left sideSo the two of them back. C has few wives. So take my wife back)

c go. B1 back --- other women can also go back. From here on, the men are on the right. There are only women on the left. As long as you go to two more women each time, go back to one woman until they all cross the river. There are also 5 women on the left. It can be done in 4 sessions).

If you want to prove that there is no solution, you must prove it thoroughly. Don't say you can't do it yourself and say that you can't solve itHow did the eighth level on the first and third floors get mixed up?

The great robbers were a wife and were

The two robbers are b's wives respectively

The three robbers are c and the wife is 6

The first time, let's go together, and then 1, row the boat over;

The second time, let's go together, and then 1, row the boat over;

The third time, let 1, a, go together, and then a, row the boat over; So that a's wives have passed.

The fourth time let's go together, and then 4, row the boat over;

For the fifth time, let 4, b, go together, and then b, row the boat over; So that b's wife also passed.

For the sixth time, let 6, c, go together, and then c, row the boat over; So there are only A, B, C, on this side of the river

For the seventh time, let a, b, go together, and then 6, row the boat over; So there are only 6 and C on this side of the river.

For the eighth time, let 6, c, and go over together.

The answer to this kind of question is not the only one, and it can also be mixed with the wives of B, C, but my method is relatively simple and clear, I hope it will help you.

ZW Chenyi's answer is not quite right.

Step 5: Let 4, B, and go over together, so that the second robber is with the wife of the big robber, and he can rob it, so it should be that the conditions of the question itself are insufficient, so there is no solution (you can use the reverse deduction to refute the last few steps of the method should be who is on the boat, you can know that there is no solution).

Therefore, the condition should be added If the number of women exceeds the number of men, they will not be robbed (violent female type), or their wives will not rob people (afraid of wife type), so that ZW Chenyi's answer is correct.

That's how I understand it.

Conclusion: Individuals (faculty and staff) should own royalties (z) for computer software

In order to derive such a conclusion, it is necessary to prove that what the individual owns (the royalties of Y's works or articles) is closely related to the computer software royalties (Z) mentioned in the conclusion, that is, Z can be derived from Y, and having Y is equivalent to having Z. However, the patent right (x) owned by the school has little to do with (z), and with x, it cannot lead to the inevitable z.

2. Then according to the above analysis, look at the answer options:

a Royalty income from inventions is higher than royalty income from teaching computer software.

It has nothing to do with the conclusion of the topic.

b Faculty members are more willing to develop teaching software programs than to invent them.

It has nothing to do with the conclusion of the topic.

It has nothing to do with the conclusion of the topic.

d In the experience of most universities, teaching software programs are easier to sell than books and articles.

It has nothing to do with the conclusion of the topic. For example, even if an individual (faculty member) loves to write teaching software programs, it is easier to sell. However, if the ownership of a computer software program is determined by the patent right of the invention, then no matter how easy the computer software program is to sell, its royalty income is still determined by the ownership of the invention patent.

If the patent right belongs to the school, then the royalties of the computer software program must be paid to the school. The conclusion of the topic cannot be supported.

e According to the criteria used to extract royalties, teaching software programs are more comparable to books and articles than to inventions.

The conclusion of the topic can be supported. That is, the relationship between the software program (Z) and the book and article (Y) is inseparable, and the royalty standard for extracting Z depends on the attribution of Y (individual), while the relationship with the invention patent right (X) is more distant.

That is, the royalty z of a computer software program, depending on the priority of the ownership of the royalty y of books and articles, is much higher than the ownership of the invention patent right. So, therefore, the owner (individual) of the book and article royalty Y should own the royalties of the computer software program Z. The conclusions of the topic were supported.

Since the word "probably" was used in the conclusion, rather than "definitely", it could be judged that the situation in item B had been taken into account. Item D is wrong in the title, which does not say at all that "working until two o'clock is the only reason why people have severe insomnia".