Is the game all about finding the optimal goal? 5

The most appropriate goal, if it is a win-win situation.

How to make the best decision in one's favor in a multi-party game has always been a difficult problem. Even though he is the pioneer of game theory and has won the Nobel Prize, it is still quite difficult to apply theory to practice and solve the multi-party game problems encountered in practical work and life.

In a dynamic game, each party has its own core interests, and each party will automatically make strategic adjustments according to the reactions of the relevant parties, which is the difficulty of game balance. Nowhere is this more well-known than the "Prisoner's Dilemma".

How to screen the best strategy for yourself in dynamic game warfare? A crucial premise is to fully collect information about the relevant parties, including their core interests and demands, and the possible ripple effects of each party after one party takes relevant measures. Only on the basis of a comprehensive grasp of intelligence.

It is possible to make the decision that is most beneficial to one's side. If you don't have the information of all parties involved in the game, and only rely on your own subjective imagination and inference, any decision you make will be blind and the consequences will be disastrous.

In "The Three-Body Problem", the male protagonist shows a firm determination to the aliens and curbs the ambition of the aliens to invade the earth; After the hesitation of its successor "Our Lady" was grasped by aliens, the last self-defense of the human world was completely destroyed, and hundreds of millions of human beings fell into a state of no return.

In all forms of struggle in the human world, including wars, commercial wars, etc., a very important prerequisite for victory is to find ways to obtain the top secret information of the other side and protect one's core secrets. Why are spy movies on the screen so eye-catching? This is because spy heroes like "Lurker" and "The Pretender" make a crucial contribution to the final winner of the game.

In ancient mythology, there are magical images such as clairvoyance and shunfeng ears, isn't it just to fully grasp the information of the other party in the game struggle and ensure that you are invincible? I wish you also have your own clairvoyance and ears!

The essence is to express the competitive contradictions in daily life in the form of games, and use mathematical and logical methods to analyze the laws of the operation of things.

In the article "The Blue Archive Unknown to Mankind" in the "Game Bible", it is written: the definition of winning; Winning is not a matter of size, not of quantity, not of equilibrium, not of strategy and tactics, but of a desired particle in the random state of the future orthodox theory.

Winning is not a blessing, losing is not a sin, and winning and losing and equilibrium belong to the content of the third empty space theory.

Mankind has long been dimly aware of the existence of the physical nature of the game, but no one has ever explained the beauty of such science.

In the article "The Blue Archive of Mankind's Unknown" in the Game Bible, it is said: "If you want to win the future, it is not the mathematician's mapping equation, but the mapping equilibrium. "We haven't found an economist who has published a convincing classical theory that there is no progress in thinking about a future where nature is all-encompassing.

The Game Bible [allusion] satirizes the highest level of game theory.

Someone asked the author of the Game Bible what game theory is.

Some people ask, so far, so many game theory books, so many authors, what is their highest level of game?

The writers of the game Bible laughed when they heard it; At present, their highest level of gambling is to sell you a book and win you a book money.

What is even more ironic is that the ancient content of game theory books is the same, there are not a few wonderful words, there are not a few classic words, and there are no theorems, laws, definitions and laws. So far, game theorists, contradictory experts, probability theorists and laymen know as much as they do.