What are the aspects of Wang Hai s anti counterfeiting case?

Updated on culture 2024-02-29
25 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Wang Hai-style" anti-counterfeiting, what do we think?

    The reporter summarized some of the views of the party that does not encourage the "Wang Hai-style" anti-counterfeiting in recent years:

    Viewpoint 1, from a legal point of view, the applicable object of "refund one compensation for one" must be consumers who have been defrauded. The so-called "consumer" must buy "for the needs of life"; The "existence of the fact of being defrauded" must be induced by the merchant to have a misunderstanding and therefore purchase. The "Wang Hai" who knowingly buy fake claims lack these two necessary conditions.

    At the same time, judging from the original intent of the legislation, the discouragement of "Wang Hai" to crack down on counterfeiting is to regulate consumption behavior and oppose malicious consumption.

    The second point of view, supervision, is not the same as claims. Article 6 of the Consumer Law stipulates that "the State encourages and supports all organizations and individuals to conduct social supervision over acts that harm the legitimate rights and interests of consumers." "China's law has never objected to citizens reporting and cracking down on false clues, but it has never supported individual citizens to exercise punishment functions on behalf of administrative organs.

    Third, compared with the rights and interests of consumers, the rights and interests of operators need to be protected under many conditions. If the rights and interests of business operators are infringed upon, it will have a greater negative impact on economic growth and social stability.

    Many consumers are a little resentful about this. The reason is that even if there are thousands of reasons not to support the "Wang Hai-style" crackdown on counterfeiting, there is no doubt that its objective effect does make those counterfeit and shoddy businesses get sanctions, safeguard the interests of more consumers, and the benefits outweigh the disadvantages.

    What's more, whether there are really "disadvantages" remains to be discussed.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Everyone must be less Wang Hai fakes.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    He is living very well now. Because of his anti-counterfeiting, the truth of many things is known to everyone, so he has a lot of popularity. And he has earned a lot of income over the years, so his life is still very happy.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    High quality of life, because these behaviors of his have also added a lot of benefits to himself, so the quality of life is very good.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Support Wang Hai, go and check Simba again, this time selling fakes again.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    He is still fighting fakes everywhere, and his life is also very rich.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    In early September 2011, Wang Hai, the first person to crack down on counterfeiting in China, broke the news again, and he issued an article pointing out that the quality of the Nike basketball shoes he purchased was different from the publicity: not only was it more than 500 yuan higher than that abroad, but also the double air cushion sold abroad became a single air cushion in China. Nike Sports (China) **** replied to this newspaper yesterday that Nike has launched an investigation process and is investigating the exact circumstances of the incident.

    Wang Hai said that he bought a pair of Nike Zoom Hyperdunk 2011 basketball sneakers at the Nike store in Xidan Joy City, Beijing, and found that the basketball shoes are different from foreign countries in terms of product quality.

    In addition, Wang Hai said that the price of the same product at home and abroad is also very different, the domestic unified sales price is 1299 yuan, while the price of the same product on Nike's official website is 125 US dollars (about 780 yuan), which is more than 500 yuan lower than that in China.

    Wang Hai believes that Nike's move is suspected of fraud, and he has reported it to the Xicheng Branch of the Beijing Municipal Administration for Industry and Commerce, and after the investigation and punishment by the Industrial and Commercial Bureau, he will file a lawsuit with the court, demanding that Nike return the goods and double the compensation to all consumers.

    On September 7, the reporter logged on to Nike's Chinese official website and saw six introductions on the basketball shoe page, but none of them were instructions for air cushions.

    Wang Hai said that Nike urgently updated the page yesterday morning, removing the description that "Zoom Air brings soft, highly responsive cushioning protection to the feet with heel and forefoot". "Nike's approach has actually admitted the fact that false propaganda defrauded Chinese consumers. But unfortunately, Nike did not apologize and did not recall the shoe, telling consumers that they could ask for double compensation," Wang said.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Wang Hai, male, Han nationality, was born in Qingdao City, Shandong Province in 1973He is currently the director of the Harmonious Community Development Center, the director of the Harmonious Community Development Center, the person in charge of the consumer rights protection project of Wang Hai, and the general manager of Beijing Dahai Business ConsultantHe is the author of "I Am Diao Min", "Wang Hai's Advice", "Drink the Head", "Property Rights Protection One-day Pass" and other books.

    In 1995, Mr. Wang Hai became the winner of the "Consumer Anti-Counterfeiting Award" established by the China Consumer Protection Association.

    In 1996, Mr. Wang Hai was rated as a news figure in China and was invited to participate in the first episode of "Tell the Truth" on ** TV station;

    In 1997, Southern Weekly called Mr. Wang a "down-to-earth patriot"; Zeling Zheng.

    In 1998, Mr. and Mrs. Clinton visited China, and Mr. and Mrs. Wang Hai had a dialogue with Mr. and Mrs. Clinton at the symposium on "Building China in the 21st Century" held in Shanghai.

    In 1999, Mr. Wang Hai appeared in the "Economic Half Hour" section of the second set of programs of ** TV station with his true face, and served as the guest host of the "Weekly Storm" column of CCTV Economic Channel;

    In 2000, Mr. Wang Hai's Haihai Business Consultant was selected into the list of cutting-edge enterprises in New Weekly. Founded the "Wang Hai**" consumer rights protection project (non-profit).

    Wang Hai has been fighting counterfeiting for 18 years, and his assets have exceeded 10 million yuan.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    I think it's also very good to fight counterfeiting as a business. Only by forming a business model. The way to fight counterfeiting will become more awesome and professional

    There will be more and more people fighting. If only by everyone's kindness and willingness. It doesn't feel like many people are going to stick to it.

    If you can profit from this. This thing will be systematically organized. This is good for the environment of our society as a whole.

    If there can be a professional anti-counterfeiter. Then the products produced by the enterprise will not dare to be counterfeited. Because there will be someone to supervise them.

    But those who fight counterfeiting also need to be supervised. If you make this an industrial chain. Some companies may bribe to fightDummy.

    If the company's bribe is higher than the salary of the counterfeiter. I feel that the matter of cracking down on counterfeiting is about to come to naught. Therefore, the specific operating model still needs to be studied.

    Any new industry emerges when. There will be doubts. But slowly after the natural formation of this profession.

    People are familiar with this profession. There won't be so many voices of skepticism. <>

    I don't think it's better to make counterfeiting a profession. We might as well improve the supervision of the regulatory authorities。It doesn't matter which company has counterfeited or shoddy.

    We must have the courage to punish him to the ground. Only the corresponding punishment goes up. These companies do not dare to act arbitrarily.

    Because they also fake to make money. If we penalize them for counterfeiting, they will be fined heavily. They stole chickens and couldn't help but lose Mi Liangfeng.

    Wouldn't do such a thing. <>

    The 315 party ** has a lot of fake and shoddy things. But we can't just point to a party and solve all the problems of product counterfeiting。We must improve the punishment system.

    Only the system has perfected Lu Xiao. in order to completely resist these behaviors. We should also strengthen education for the public good.

    I feel like the law is people's bottom line. But people still have to be moral. We also need to enhance the moral education of citizens in our television programs.

    Let them have a sense of public morality. I won't do things that hurt others and benefit myself.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    I think his approach is also for Zen Liang, because his behavior is worth learning from, and cracking down on counterfeiting is not what it should be, so He Peiyun's approach is recognized by many people.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    For Wang Hai, as long as he identifies a product as fake, he will bend the sedan chair to make money, and at the same time, he also brings us a lot of convenience, let us know what can be bought and what cannot be bought.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    I don't think what he did was right, because cracking down on counterfeiting is to protect the rights and interests of consumers who are hungry, but it is indeed immoral for him to obtain his own interests in this way.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    His approach is very bad, because cracking down on counterfeiting is the attitude that ordinary people should have, so that he can make himself and the rest of the Xuan clan not be harmed, so he can't fight for the sake of making money.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    His approach is right, all counterfeit and shoddy products should be stopped, but the idea is wrong, cracking down on counterfeiting is a just thing, and it cannot be linked to money.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    I think he's doing the right thing, he can show that he's about making money, and it's also helping consumers to see the authenticity of the product.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    There are also some right, because by doing this, he can also avoid the loss of many people, he makes the market more fair, he makes the market more harmonious.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    I think it's right, that's what he makes money from, and it's okay for him to say it bluntly.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    The approach is correct, mainly because he wants to get a certain amount of pre-bridge benefits through a series of behaviors, and it can also be seen that Min Nu has a certain mind in business, so the approach should be correct.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    No, because he doesn't think the right thing, it will cause him to walk off the rails, and he will sink into the mud.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    It is still relatively correct, because the situation of counterfeiting in the market is more serious, and it also infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Although Wang Hai, as a professional anti-counterfeiter, is indeed defending the justice of the law to a certain extent, the fight against counterfeiting is actually a business. For Wang Hai, he can get benefits from the process of fighting counterfeiting, so he is willing to do it. <>

    Wang Hai has a total of 8 companies, and one is suspected of serious violations, and the proportion of his investment in this one is 20%, which means that the main body of responsibility is not on him. In addition, he has two companies whose business licenses have been revoked, and there are no definite answers to these questions.

    Wang Hai is a serious businessman, but we can imagine that Wang Hai is a serious businessman, he is not really acting on behalf of justice, he is completely doing business. How to operate the business of fighting counterfeiting, I am afraid that it is difficult for us outsiders to describe it completely, at most we can only guess, because there are still many possibilities of black-box operation, and we cannot see it. <>

    Wang Hai's biggest fight against counterfeiting was the attack on Luo Yonghao's mouthwash, Luo Yonghao's company did a very good job in responding to the mouthwash incident, and Wang Hai failed in this game. But on the woolen sweater, he slapped Luo Yonghao's team hard, and Wang Hai became famous because of this.

    Luo Yonghao may be trying to gain popularity, what does Wang Hai want to do in this incident? Does he want a little compensation? Not really, because the compensation that can be given by both mouthwash and cardigan is very limited, only a few hundred to a few thousand dollars.

    The cost invested by Wang Hai's team in the process of cracking down on counterfeiting is far more than that, so what they want is to gain popularity. I hope that with the help of Luo Yonghao's identity as a big Internet celebrity, I can also become a big Internet celebrity, so as to obtain greater benefits from sustainability. <>

    Knowing that buying counterfeits is prohibited by law, in fact, cracking down on counterfeiting was a disgraceful thing for a period of time, and was even banned by law for a time. Because some professional teams know that there are some problems with some products, they also buy these products on a large scale, and blackmail the store, requiring the company to give a certain amount of hush money, otherwise they will report to the industrial and commercial department, so that they lose their business qualifications, which is of a worse nature.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    Because the fight against counterfeiting also needs to comply with the laws of the country, it is not possible to use illegal means to cause losses to merchants.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    Because he has a weak sense of law, he is not strict with himself, and although he fights counterfeiting, he does not focus on his company's illegal acts.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    Because there are many things that can be involuntarily self-contained, and in the face of interests, it is very easy for people to lose their minds and do some irreparable things.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    In recent days, Wang Hai can be said to have become a well-known figure again, but Wang Hai's company is now defined as a serious violation, and there are actually pros and cons to the emergence of professional counterfeiters.

    Why is Wang Hai suspected of serious violations?

    There is a word called knowing the fake and buying the fake, this is to do it premeditatedly, if it is qualitative, this matter can be characterized as extortion, because if you buy a fake, you can go to compensation, if you buy hundreds, thousands, this is malicious blackmail, for Wang Hai, what he is doing now is this, some people will ask, what should be done if it is not illegal? When you know about counterfeit products, you should report to the local management department as soon as possible, and let the law enforcement department deal with the matter, as a company or individual has no right to deal with it.

    Pros and cons of the emergence of professional anti-counterfeiters

    In fact, there are pros and cons to the emergence of professional counterfeiters, the advantage is that there are these people, many fakes have nowhere to hide, when there is nowhere to hide, it will naturally surface, cracking down on fakes is naturally a blow to fake manufacturers, but there will also be drawbacks, if everyone does this, it will have a serious impact on the social order, after all, our country is a society under the rule of law, if we all solve such problems by ourselves, Then it will be difficult for the relevant departments to find the source of the problem.

    Summary of the problem

    In fact, for Wang Hai company's suspected illegal problem, it is legally established, and it is illegal to know that the fake and counterfeit and counterfeit are illegal, but due to various problems, there are indeed many problems of poor timeliness in rights protection, so there is such a problem, there will also be such a profession, there are pros and cons, this should be looked at from different angles, for consumers of course hope that such people exist, but for the formal department is not wanted, and it is more hoped that the insider will provide information to be handled by the relevant departments. So the above are my personal views and thoughts, just for reference.

Related questions
21 answers2024-02-29

It is recommended that customers apply for the VISA World Cup credit card of the ABC My Way series, which is a credit card created for young people who pay attention to the World Cup and love sports, and belongs to the special theme card under the MY WAY series of credit cards for young customers. >>>More

7 answers2024-02-29

1) The product sales group is aimed at children and women, and it is a snack consumption. Therefore, we pay attention to miniaturization and convenience in packaging, and pay attention to petty consumption (that is, the smallest unit of yuan). 2) Turning waste into treasure is a great innovation in itself. >>>More

7 answers2024-02-29

In life, we often hear about the infringement of intellectual products, but what are the examples of protecting one's intellectual property? Intellectual property rights, in a broad sense, include copyright as copyright, patents as technical inventions, trademarks, trade secrets and well-known rights, etc., of which the first three categories are protected quite comprehensively. Today, we present a few examples of the protection of intellectual property rights: >>>More

3 answers2024-02-29

The financial risk case can be written as follows:1. HNA Holdings (600221). >>>More

9 answers2024-02-29

1. Resist management, and the person who is managed is dissatisfied with and dissatisfied with the management personnel! >>>More