Why do you always say, If the Son does not teach, the Father is the Father s fault.

A child's growth is inseparable from his parents, because as the saying goes, parents are their children's first teachers. Teach children to speak, walk, and call mom and dad, parents generally teach by word and deed, and imperceptibly learn some of the parents' behaviors in the child's life. Therefore, the influence of parents on their children is enormous.

Generally, children like to learn at the age of three to five years old, and sometimes they like to learn a sentence when they say a sentence next to them. The curiosity and freshness of the world are expressed in the language, and at the same time, the person who accompanies him during this period is naturally his father or mother, or grandma and grandfather, in short, everything is a decision made by the parents, so we say that the son does not teach, and the father is at fault.

In ancient times, women had no rights, and men were in charge of the family. Although it is said that women are noble because they are husbands and children, men are experts at going out. But this is, after all, machismo.

In ancient times, but for the family, the person who can make decisions and make ideas may also be men. Although it has now entered the era of democratic civilization.

But there is still a big difference between men and women. For example, in my family, my parents usually discuss it, but it is my father who decides more. The father still has a great position in the family, and it is still worth paying great attention to the education of the child throughout his life.

It is the father's responsibility and the mother's responsibility to raise and educate children from an early age. We always say: "If the son does not teach, the father is wrong" is due to the problems left over from history.

In ancient times, fathers played important roles in the family, and women were rarely recognized by others when they went out, so it was natural to blame the father for the child's upbringing.

Because the child is still underage and cannot take responsibility for many things, parents, as supervisors, should educate their children well and guide them to the right path.

Because a large part of children's learning comes from the influence of their parents, if parents do not like to learn, it will lead to children's attitude towards learning will also be very improper.

Because parents are the first to contact their children, they can't teach well, of course, the most serious.

Because parents play a very important role in their children's education, part of the child's bad behavior must be related to the discipline at home.

Because parents are their children's first teachers, their words and deeds affect their children!

Because parents are the first teachers of their children, there are some shortcomings in their children's growth, and parents are also responsible.

If the son is not educated well, then the father must have a great responsibility.

If the son doesn't teach, the father is at fault", these two things are the responsibility of the father! Being a mother can't be replaced.

I don't know, maybe that's what the old saying goes, so let's continue like this.

Meaning: It is the fault of parents who only provide food and clothing for their children without educating them well.

Source: "Three Character Classic".

Original text: If you don't teach, it's your father's fault. If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy.

Translation: It is the fault of parents who only provide food and clothing for their children without educating them well. It's just education, but not being strict is the laziness of being a teacher.

1. Meaning:

It is the father's fault that he only provides food and clothing for his children and does not educate them well. The father's important role in tutoring is irreplaceable by anyone.

2. Source: From the "Three Character Classic".

3. Excerpt from the original text:

If you don't teach, it's your father's fault. If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy.

If you don't learn, it's not appropriate. If you don't learn from the young, what is the old.

4. Translation: It is the fault of parents who only provide food and clothing for their children and do not educate them well. It's just education, but not being strict is the laziness of being a teacher. It is very undesirable for children to refuse to study hard.

If a person does not study hard when he is a child, and when he is old, he does not understand the principles of being a human being, and he has no knowledge, then it will be difficult to make a difference when he is old.

The meaning of the son not teaching the father: it is the fault of the parents who only provide food and clothing for their children and do not educate them well. It's just education, but not being strict is the laziness of being a teacher.

Source: "Three Character Classic" [Author] Wang Yinglin [Dynasty] Song Dynasty "The son does not teach, the father's fault" This sentence is a revision of the "Three Character Classic", the original text is:

If you don't teach, it's your father's fault. If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy.

It is not the fault of the children who do not teach their parents. Nor is it the fault of the father for not educating his children.

The original text means:

It is the fault of the father (parents) that he did not send his children to school (in ancient times, it was a private school).

Not sending them to school and not educating their children are two different things.

That is to say, it is the responsibility of parents for children to make mistakes, and there are parents all over the world? Wrong! There are no children in the world!

When a child is born with a blank piece of paper, who is teaching? Who's taking it? Who's leading by example?

Who's in charge? That's all parents! Everything is taught by your parents!

Even if it is superstitious, it is the fault of the parents that it is the fault of the parents, and there is such retribution!

It is the father's fault that he has a child without education.

It is the fault of the parents to teach their children.

It is the fault of the parents that their children do not teach.

This is what children mean by not teaching their parents' mistakes, which is meant to indicate that children should discipline their parents well.

In layman's terms, it means; It is the fault of the father not to educate his children, and it is the responsibility of the teacher to not educate well. In fact, the original meaning of this passage is; It is the father's fault that he does not send his children to be educated; Bad education is the laziness of teachers. Rather, it is the father's fault that he does not educate his children personally.

This interpretation stems from the tradition of 'teaching by changing children'.

Zi, refers to children, children; Father, refers to the parents, which means that it is the fault of the parents that the child is not taught well. And not the fault of the father alone.

It is said that parents are the only profession that can be employed without exams. When we have children, we go to the position of parents, but do we really take on the responsibilities of parents?

As a parent, the first thing to do is to control your emotions. Have we ever had the experience of interrupting our child with irritated language when he was wronged and confided in us? When we come home from work after a tiring day and look at a room full of toys, we threaten our children to throw them away if they don't pack them up; Do we remember how we treated our children when we were anxious about something and our children pestered us to tell us stories?

As a parent, you must not only control your emotions, but also take on the responsibilities of being a parent.

The child does not teach, the parents do", when the child has bad behavior, such as lying, scolding, fighting, who is responsible? Of course, it is the responsibility of parents. The mother crossed the street with the child's little hand, and the red light came on, and the child said:

Mom, red light, can't cross the street", the mother said to the child: "It's okay, it's up to mom to lead you, you won't be hit". The child was vaccinated, and the mother said to the child:

Child, it doesn't hurt at all", as a result, the child cried and said "Mom lied".

Once on the train, I saw a couple arguing with the conductor about whether to buy a full ticket or a half ticket for their child, while there was an embarrassed child standing next to him; When a child is born, we leave it to the care of the elderly; In this way, we evade the responsibility of taking care of the children and accompanying the children, but one day, when the children have all kinds of problems and are criticized for not having a tutor, we point the finger at the children. Is it really a child's problem?

When a child comes into this world, her original nature is kind, friendly, and innocent. The child's curiosity and ability to imitate are very strong, and the words and deeds of his first teacher, that is, the parents, affect the child's worldview, values and outlook on life all the time. If the parents are compared to the original, then the child is a copy, when the child has a problem, we have to find the problem from the parents, when the parents' problems are corrected, the child will naturally be fine.

The son does not teach the fault of the father This sentence should be the fault of the father who does not teach it. Meaning: It is the fault of parents who only provide food and clothing for their children without educating them well. It comes from the traditional Chinese enlightenment textbook "Three Character Classic".

Among the ancient Chinese classics, the "Three Character Classic" is one of the most simple and easy to read books.

1 The meaning of the son not to teach the father.

The true meaning of the son not teaching the father is that it is the father's fault that he has raised a child and does not educate it. From Song Wang Yinglin's "Three Character Classic" does not teach, the father's teaching, the teaching is not strict, and the teacher is lazy.

It is very undesirable for children to refuse to study hard. If a person does not study hard when he is a child, and when he is old, he does not understand the principles of being a human being and has no knowledge, what can he do?

Excerpt from the original text of the Son Not the Father's Fault:

If you don't teach, it's your father's fault. If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy. If you don't learn, it's not appropriate. If the young don't learn, what is the annihilation of the old.

If the jade is not cut, it will not be made. People do not learn, they do not know righteousness. As a son of man, when Fang was young. Relatives and friends, practice etiquette.

Translation of the original text of the Son not the Father's fault:

If the son does not teach the father, it is the fault of the father. It's just education, but not being strict is the laziness of being a teacher. It is very undesirable for children to refuse to study hard.

If a person does not study hard when he is a child, and when he is old, he does not understand the principles of being a human being and has no knowledge, what can he do?

The son does not teach the father's fault, just like jade does not become a fine utensil if it is not carved. And if people don't know how to learn and realize their own value with their own knowledge and skills, they don't know etiquette and can't become talents. Children from childhood.

Get close to your teachers and friends, and learn a lot of etiquette and knowledge from them.

2 Educational revelations that the son does not teach the father

The son in "the son does not teach the father" refers to the child's family, the child, the father, refers to the parents and even the elders, including the grandparents, my grandparents and other guardians, which means that the child is not taught well, it is the fault of the elders of the family, not the fault of the father alone. There is some truth to it, but it is a bit narrow-minded.

The child croaks and falls to the ground from the mother's body, and it is all innocent, just like a blank piece of paper, whatever is painted, it is what it is. If he paints the latest and most beautiful patterns on it, he will be beautiful when he grows up, and if he carelessly scribbles on it, he will grow up to be bad. Why is there such a big difference, the key is education.

The ancients told us a long time ago that the son did not teach the father, "If you don't teach, the father is wrong." If the teaching is not strict, the teacher is lazy. In other words, education is not the responsibility of unilateral parents, nor is it the responsibility of unilateral teachers, but the responsibility of both parties.

The fact that the son does not teach the father tells us that parents should be primarily responsible for the education of their children. In fact, to a large extent, fathers have far less influence on their children than mothers have on their children. After all, in traditional culture, the father is outside the main and the mother is inside the home.

No one is born to understand everything, and to learn from whoever he follows. Parents have children and spend the most time with their children, so they learn the most from their parents. If the parent's education is lacking, or the education is not appropriate, the impact on the child is immeasurable.