Briefly describe the difference between war and armed conflict

Updated on military 2024-02-08
13 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    War refers to the collective and organized use of violence against each other, and is an armed battle between opposing sides in order to achieve certain political, economic, and territorial integrity goals.

    In international law, armed conflict mainly refers to the use of force between states that does not constitute a state of war in law.

    of armed hostilities.

    The so-called "not constituting a de jure state of war" includes, inter alia, the absence of a formal means of commencement, no declaration or notification, only actual combat operations. The practice of armed conflicts also varies in terms of legal consequences.

    Generally speaking, it does not produce all the legal consequences of a state of war, and international law in time of war is not fully applicable, only the part of the "laws of war" applies; Diplomatic relations (between belligerents).

    Not necessarily a complete severance; Treaties and other relations may not be suspended in their entirety (bilateral treaties may be suspended, and multilateral treaties will be affected); The neutrality law does not apply; The rules for the restriction and confiscation of enemy property do not apply; Belligerents shall not exercise the right of inspection or capture on the high seas against vessels of non-belligerents; It is forbidden to blockade enemy coasts and ports.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    War refers to large-scale conflicts, where wars are fought between countries, whereas armed conflict refers to small-scale duels.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    In international law, armed conflict mainly refers to the act of armed hostilities between States that does not constitute a de jure state of war resulting from the mutual use of force.

    Armed conflicts that do not constitute a de jure state of war have no formal means of begining, no declarations or notifications, only actual combat operations.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Let me give you an example!

    You'll understand right away!

    In 1932, the Japanese Marine Corps stationed in Shanghai deliberately provoked an incident, known as the 128 Incident in history. Later, the highest authorities of China and Japan signed an armistice agreement, and the scale of the fighting was controlled, and it was basically limited to the area around Zhabei in Shanghai, and it was not further expanded, which was called a conflict.

    In 1937, also in Shanghai, Japan launched the August 13 Incident again, this time, the highest authorities of the national government publicly and officially announced resistance, and the main forces of the regular army of both sides were successively reinforced to more than one million people, which lasted for more than three months, covering Nanjing, Shanghai and Hangzhou, which is called war!

    Enough to understand! If you still have objections to what you haven't understood, find a way to see and learn more about history, and don't drill boring horns with me! No explanation, no debate.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It was a coup d'état by the people that overthrew the current regime. According to the subject of conflict, it can be divided into armed conflict between countries and armed conflict between internal hostile groups;

    According to the nature of the conflict, it can be divided into armed conflicts that constitute a state of war (i.e., war) and actual armed conflicts that do not constitute a state of war; According to the degree and scope of conflict, it can be divided into full-scale and long-term armed conflict and local and temporary armed conflict. Different types of armed conflict have different legal consequences.

  6. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    A coup d'état by the people overthrew the current regime. According to the main structure of the conflict, it can be divided into armed conflict between countries and armed conflict between internal hostile groups;

    According to the nature of the conflict, it can be divided into armed conflicts that constitute a state of war (i.e., war) and actual armed conflicts that do not constitute a state of war; According to the degree and scope of the conflict, it can be divided into comprehensive.

    Wars develop from armed conflicts, but armed conflicts inevitably develop into wars. The boundaries between the two are difficult to distinguish, but in a strictly legal sense, the main differences between the two are:

    The main body of war is mainly the state, while armed conflict is not limited to the state, but also includes ethnic groups, belligerent groups and rebel groups; War is a legal state created by armed conflict, which is only a de facto state resulting from the use of force.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    More than one country organizes confrontation, fights by force, and achieves the goal of resolution within the limits of the conflict law!

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    It's the matchmaker. A coup d'état by the people overthrew the current regime.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    A coup d'état by the people overthrew the current regime. According to the subject of conflict, it can be divided into armed conflict between countries and armed conflict between internal hostile groups;

    According to the nature of the conflict, it can be divided into an armed conflict (i.e., war) that is modeled into a state of war and an actual armed conflict that does not constitute a state of war. According to the degree and scope of the conflict, it can be divided into comprehensive.

    Wars develop from armed conflicts, but armed conflicts do not always develop into wars. The boundaries between the two are difficult to distinguish, but in a strictly legal sense, the main differences between the two are:

    The main body of war is mainly the state, while armed conflict is not limited to the state, but also includes ethnic groups, belligerent groups and rebel groups; War is a legal state created by armed conflict, which is only a de facto state resulting from the use of force.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Go to Xinhua Bookstore, if you don't have it, go to Ossa, although it's all pirated.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    In fact, armed conflict can be regarded as a small-scale, low-intensity, and relatively small number of wars, but if the armed conflict is not dealt with in a timely manner, it may develop into a fuse for the war and detonate a large-scale war.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Compared with armed conflict, the form of confrontation is manifested as: first, the cruelty of the jujube sail, the two sides attack the other side by all available violent means; the second is destructive, when confrontation comes at the cost of one party destroying the other; the third is purposefulness, until the other party gives in and achieves the goal; Fourth, protracted warfare, conventional warfare lasts for several years or decades, while modern high-tech warfare lasts for months to several years. Any war is planned and prepared.

    Refer to Ziwang!!

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Compared with armed conflict, war is characterized by brutality, in which both sides attack the other side by all available violent means; the second is destructive, when confrontation comes at the cost of one party destroying the other; the third is purposefulness, until the other party succumbs and achieves the goal; Fourth, it is protracted, with conventional wars lasting up to several years or decades, while modern high-tech wars can last for months to years. Any war is planned and prepared.

Related questions
7 answers2024-02-08

GraphicsHD3850 Player Edition 512MB

Motherboard ASUS M2N68 SE >>>More